These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1813341)

  • 1. Independent movement of cusps during occlusal loading.
    Sakaguchi RL; Brust EW; Cross M; DeLong R; Douglas WH
    Dent Mater; 1991 Jul; 7(3):186-90. PubMed ID: 1813341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of occlusal contact and cusp inclination on the biomechanical character of a maxillary premolar: a finite element analysis.
    Liu S; Liu Y; Xu J; Rong Q; Pan S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1238-45. PubMed ID: 24836532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Strain patterns in cervical enamel of teeth subjected to occlusal loading.
    Palamara D; Palamara JE; Tyas MJ; Messer HH
    Dent Mater; 2000 Nov; 16(6):412-9. PubMed ID: 10967190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of methods for measuring cuspal deformation in teeth.
    Jantarat J; Panitvisai P; Palamara JE; Messer HH
    J Dent; 2001 Jan; 29(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 11137641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stresses at the dentinoenamel junction of human teeth--a finite element investigation.
    Goel VK; Khera SC; Ralston JL; Chang KH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Oct; 66(4):451-9. PubMed ID: 1791555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Strains in the marginal ridge during occlusal loading.
    Palamara JE; Palamara D; Messer HH
    Aust Dent J; 2002 Sep; 47(3):218-22. PubMed ID: 12405461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 3D-finite element analyses of cusp movements in a human upper premolar, restored with adhesive resin-based composites.
    Ausiello P; Apicella A; Davidson CL; Rengo S
    J Biomech; 2001 Oct; 34(10):1269-77. PubMed ID: 11522306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of root morphology on biomechanical behaviour of premolars associated with abfraction lesions and different loading types.
    Soares PV; Souza LV; Veríssimo C; Zeola LF; Pereira AG; Santos-Filho PC; Fernandes-Neto AJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 2014 Feb; 41(2):108-14. PubMed ID: 24666269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 3-D stress analysis in first maxillary premolar.
    Borcić J; Antonić R; Urek MM; Petricević N; Nola-Fuchs P; Catić A; Smojver I
    Coll Antropol; 2007 Dec; 31(4):1025-9. PubMed ID: 18217453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficient 3D finite element analysis of dental restorative procedures using micro-CT data.
    Magne P
    Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):539-48. PubMed ID: 16730058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multifactorial analysis of an MOD restored human premolar using auto-mesh finite element approach.
    Lin CL; Chang CH; Ko CC
    J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Jun; 28(6):576-85. PubMed ID: 11422685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Finite element analysis of mechanism of cervical lesion formation in simulated molars during mastication and parafunction.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A; Romanowicz M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Dec; 94(6):520-9. PubMed ID: 16316798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cuspal deflection of maxillary premolars restored with bonded amalgam.
    el-Badrawy WA
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(6):337-43. PubMed ID: 10823082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of variation in occlusal loading on the development of abfraction lesions: a finite element study.
    Rees JS
    J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Feb; 29(2):188-93. PubMed ID: 11856399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Analysis of the effect of mesial implant position on surrounding bone stress of mandibular edentulous jaw under dynamic loads].
    Li Y; Sun C; Jia H; Luo XJ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):672-677. PubMed ID: 29972946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dentin horn angle and enamel thickness interactively control tooth resilience and bite force.
    Chai H
    Acta Biomater; 2018 Jul; 75():279-286. PubMed ID: 29874598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Potential for load-induced cervical stress concentration as a function of periodontal support.
    Kuroe T; Itoh H; Caputo AA; Nakahara H
    J Esthet Dent; 1999; 11(4):215-22. PubMed ID: 10825878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cusp reinforcement by bonding of amalgam restorations.
    Pilo R; Brosh T; Chweidan H
    J Dent; 1998; 26(5-6):467-72. PubMed ID: 9699439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanical interactions of cuspal-coverage designs and cement thickness in a cusp-replacing ceramic premolar restoration: a finite element study.
    Chang YH; Lin WH; Kuo WC; Chang CY; Lin CL
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2009 Apr; 47(4):367-74. PubMed ID: 18679734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of a restored maxillary second premolar tooth by using three-dimensional finite element method.
    Toparli M; Gökay N; Aksoy T
    J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Feb; 26(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 10080314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.