These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1813341)
1. Independent movement of cusps during occlusal loading. Sakaguchi RL; Brust EW; Cross M; DeLong R; Douglas WH Dent Mater; 1991 Jul; 7(3):186-90. PubMed ID: 1813341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of occlusal contact and cusp inclination on the biomechanical character of a maxillary premolar: a finite element analysis. Liu S; Liu Y; Xu J; Rong Q; Pan S J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1238-45. PubMed ID: 24836532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficient 3D finite element analysis of dental restorative procedures using micro-CT data. Magne P Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):539-48. PubMed ID: 16730058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multifactorial analysis of an MOD restored human premolar using auto-mesh finite element approach. Lin CL; Chang CH; Ko CC J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Jun; 28(6):576-85. PubMed ID: 11422685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Finite element analysis of mechanism of cervical lesion formation in simulated molars during mastication and parafunction. Dejak B; Mlotkowski A; Romanowicz M J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Dec; 94(6):520-9. PubMed ID: 16316798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cuspal deflection of maxillary premolars restored with bonded amalgam. el-Badrawy WA Oper Dent; 1999; 24(6):337-43. PubMed ID: 10823082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of variation in occlusal loading on the development of abfraction lesions: a finite element study. Rees JS J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Feb; 29(2):188-93. PubMed ID: 11856399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Analysis of the effect of mesial implant position on surrounding bone stress of mandibular edentulous jaw under dynamic loads]. Li Y; Sun C; Jia H; Luo XJ Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):672-677. PubMed ID: 29972946 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Dentin horn angle and enamel thickness interactively control tooth resilience and bite force. Chai H Acta Biomater; 2018 Jul; 75():279-286. PubMed ID: 29874598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Potential for load-induced cervical stress concentration as a function of periodontal support. Kuroe T; Itoh H; Caputo AA; Nakahara H J Esthet Dent; 1999; 11(4):215-22. PubMed ID: 10825878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cusp reinforcement by bonding of amalgam restorations. Pilo R; Brosh T; Chweidan H J Dent; 1998; 26(5-6):467-72. PubMed ID: 9699439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanical interactions of cuspal-coverage designs and cement thickness in a cusp-replacing ceramic premolar restoration: a finite element study. Chang YH; Lin WH; Kuo WC; Chang CY; Lin CL Med Biol Eng Comput; 2009 Apr; 47(4):367-74. PubMed ID: 18679734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of a restored maxillary second premolar tooth by using three-dimensional finite element method. Toparli M; Gökay N; Aksoy T J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Feb; 26(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 10080314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]