These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1813343)

  • 1. Dentin surface reproduction with hydrophilic and hydrophobic impression materials.
    Takahashi H; Finger WJ
    Dent Mater; 1991 Jul; 7(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 1813343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of two hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials tested under dry, moist, and wet conditions.
    Petrie CS; Walker MP; O'mahony AM; Spencer P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Oct; 90(4):365-72. PubMed ID: 14564291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The physical properties of silicone impression materials with hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity. Wetting, water absorption, surface structure of dental stone and dimensional change on stone dies].
    Murakami H; Takehana S; Takenaka M; Abe T
    Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi; 1990 Dec; 28(4):1105-14. PubMed ID: 2135145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of surface moisture on detail reproduction of elastomeric impressions.
    Johnson GH; Lepe X; Aw TC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Oct; 90(4):354-64. PubMed ID: 14564290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surface detail reproduction under simulated pulpal pressure: a 3-dimensional optical profilometer and scanning electron microscopy evaluation.
    Acar O; Erkut S; Lakshmipathy M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Aug; 108(2):102-13. PubMed ID: 22867807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors influencing optical 3D scanning of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    DeLong R; Pintado MR; Ko CC; Hodges JS; Douglas WH
    J Prosthodont; 2001 Jun; 10(2):78-85. PubMed ID: 11512112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dimensional accuracy and detail reproduction of two hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials tested under different conditions.
    Katyayan PA; Kalavathy N; Katyayan M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):881-2. PubMed ID: 22484900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surface properties and castability of elastomeric impression materials after plasma cleaning.
    Fernandes CP; Vassilakos N; Nilner K
    Dent Mater; 1992 Nov; 8(6):354-8. PubMed ID: 1303381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
    Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The study on surface porosity of die stone. Influence of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials].
    Okuda N; Ueno S; Kawada E; Nakanishi K; Sumii T
    Shikwa Gakuho; 1990 Feb; 90(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 2135095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation and comparison of dimensional accuracy of newly introduced elastomeric impression material using 3D laser scanners: an in vitro study.
    Pandita A; Jain T; Yadav NS; Feroz SM; Pradeep ; Diwedi A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Mar; 14(2):265-8. PubMed ID: 23811657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sulcus depth reproduction with polyvinyl siloxane impression material: effects of hydrophilicity and impression temperature.
    Takahashi H; Finger WJ; Kurokawa R; Furukawa M; Komatsu M
    Quintessence Int; 2010 Mar; 41(3):e43-50. PubMed ID: 20213014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The dynamic interaction of water with four dental impression materials during cure.
    Hosseinpour D; Berg JC
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):292-300. PubMed ID: 19210607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Defects in automixed addition silicone elastomers prepared by putty-wash impression technique.
    Soh G; Chong YH
    J Oral Rehabil; 1991 Nov; 18(6):547-53. PubMed ID: 1762027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contact angles of contemporary type 3 impression materials.
    Balkenhol M; Eichhorn M; Wostmann B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):396-8. PubMed ID: 19639079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the surface detail reproduction of flexible die material systems.
    Gerrow JD; Price RB
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Oct; 80(4):485-9. PubMed ID: 9791798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surface detail reproduction of elastomeric impression materials related to rheological properties.
    German MJ; Carrick TE; McCabe JF
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jul; 24(7):951-6. PubMed ID: 18164051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experimental study on the use of spacer foils in two-step putty and wash impression procedures using silicone impression materials.
    Mann K; Davids A; Range U; Richter G; Boening K; Reitemeier B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):316-22. PubMed ID: 25453563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
    Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surface detail reproduction with new elastomeric dental impression materials.
    Kanehira M; Finger WJ; Komatsu M
    Quintessence Int; 2007 Jun; 38(6):479-88. PubMed ID: 17625631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.