126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1813427)
1. Radiovisiography for length estimation in root canal treatment: an in-vitro comparison with conventional radiography.
Shearer AC; Horner K; Wilson NH
Int Endod J; 1991 Sep; 24(5):233-9. PubMed ID: 1813427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interpretation of endodontic file lengths using RadioVisiography.
Leddy BJ; Miles DA; Newton CW; Brown CE
J Endod; 1994 Nov; 20(11):542-5. PubMed ID: 7643038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An in vitro comparison of 10 radiographic methods for working length estimation.
Rushton VE; Shearer AC; Horner K; Czajka J
Int Endod J; 1995 May; 28(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 8626199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Image quality of direct digital intraoral x-ray sensors in assessing root canal length. The RadioVisioGraphy, Visualix/VIXA, Sens-A-Ray, and Flash Dent systems compared with Ektaspeed films.
Sanderink GC; Huiskens R; van der Stelt PF; Welander US; Stheeman SE
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Jul; 78(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 8078654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of radiovisiography with radiographic film in root length determination.
Ong EY; Pitt Ford TR
Int Endod J; 1995 Jan; 28(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 7642325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiographic detection of accessory/lateral canals: use of RadioVisioGraphy and Hypaque.
Scarfe WC; Fana CR; Farman AG
J Endod; 1995 Apr; 21(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 7673818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of three imaging techniques for assessing endodontic working length.
Griffiths BM; Brown JE; Hyatt AT; Linney AD
Int Endod J; 1992 Nov; 25(6):279-87. PubMed ID: 1306859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiovisiography for imaging root canals: an in vitro comparison with conventional radiography.
Shearer AC; Horner K; Wilson NH
Quintessence Int; 1990 Oct; 21(10):789-94. PubMed ID: 2082410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiovisiography versus conventional radiography for detection of small instruments in endodontic length determination. II. In vivo evaluation.
Ellingsen MA; Hollender LG; Harrington GW
J Endod; 1995 Oct; 21(10):516-20. PubMed ID: 8596074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro comparison of root-canal measurements with conventional and digital radiology.
Lozano A; Forner L; Llena C
Int Endod J; 2002 Jun; 35(6):542-50. PubMed ID: 12190912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Endodontic measurement accuracy and perceived radiograph quality: effects of film speed and density.
Sheaffer JC; Eleazer PD; Scheetz JP; Clark SJ; Farman AG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Oct; 96(4):441-8. PubMed ID: 14561969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiovisiography versus conventional radiography for detection of small instruments in endodontic length determination. Part 1. In vitro evaluation.
Ellingsen MA; Harrington GW; Hollender LG
J Endod; 1995 Jun; 21(6):326-31. PubMed ID: 7673842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of film-based, digital, and enhanced digital images for endodontic length determination.
Woolhiser GA; Brand JW; Hoen MM; Geist JR; Pikula AA; Pink FE
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Apr; 99(4):499-504. PubMed ID: 15772601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiographic determination of canal length direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography.
Hedrick RT; Dove SB; Peters DD; McDavid WD
J Endod; 1994 Jul; 20(7):320-6. PubMed ID: 7996092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of E-speed film for root canal length determination.
Powell-Cullingford AW; Pitt Ford TR
Int Endod J; 1993 Sep; 26(5):268-72. PubMed ID: 8300258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Endodontic measurements in digital radiographs acquired by a photostimulable, storage phosphor system.
Borg E; Gröndahl HG
Endod Dent Traumatol; 1996 Feb; 12(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 8631285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Determination of the apical limits of instrumentation by subtraction using the paralleling radiographic technic. (Study contribution)].
Solbo LJ; Pesce HF; Bombana AC
Rev Faculdade Odontol FZL; 1989; 1(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 2701074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography for estimation of canal length in curved canals.
Burger CL; Mork TO; Hutter JW; Nicoll B
J Endod; 1999 Apr; 25(4):260-3. PubMed ID: 10425952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Imaging of root canal fillings: a comparison of subjective image quality between limited cone-beam CT, storage phosphor and film radiography.
Soğur E; Baksi BG; Gröndahl HG
Int Endod J; 2007 Mar; 40(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 17305694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of imaging system and exposure on accurate detection of the second mesio-buccal canal in maxillary molar teeth.
Ramamurthy R; Scheetz JP; Clark SJ; Farman AG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Dec; 102(6):796-802. PubMed ID: 17138184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
