These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1813427)

  • 21. [Eccentric projection for the observation of the root canals of the upper premolars].
    Shimano T; Hirota S; Omochi M; Daibo M
    Ou Daigaku Shigakushi; 1990 Nov; 17(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 2132322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of various digital processing algorithms on the measurement accuracy of endodontic file length.
    Kal BI; Baksi BG; Dündar N; Sen BH
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Feb; 103(2):280-4. PubMed ID: 17234548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Measurement algorithm accuracy of the RVG-PCi in vertical and diagonal assessments at various beam energies.
    Garlock JA; Scarfe WC; Kamer KR; Farman AG
    J Endod; 1996 Dec; 22(12):646-50. PubMed ID: 9220748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Radiovisiographic diagnosis of dental caries: initial comparison of basic mode videoprints with bitewing radiography.
    Russell M; Pitts NB
    Caries Res; 1993; 27(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 8448777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Radiographic "working length" revisited.
    Stein TJ; Corcoran JF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Dec; 74(6):796-800. PubMed ID: 1488238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An ex vivo comparison of conventional and digital radiography for perceived image quality of root fillings.
    Akdeniz BG; Soğur E
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):397-401. PubMed ID: 15910475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of voxel size and resolution on the accuracy of endodontic length measurement using cone beam computed tomography.
    Aktan AM; Yildirim C; Karataşlıoğlu E; Çiftçi ME; Aksoy F
    Ann Anat; 2016 Nov; 208():96-102. PubMed ID: 27339301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Presentation and physical evaluation of RadioVisioGraphy.
    Mouyen F; Benz C; Sonnabend E; Lodter JP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Aug; 68(2):238-42. PubMed ID: 2780024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Radiographic endodontic working length estimation: comparison of three digital image receptors.
    Athar A; Angelopoulos C; Katz JO; Williams KB; Spencer P
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):604-8. PubMed ID: 18718798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessing the shape of root canals: an in vitro method using microradiography.
    Thompson SA; al-Omari AO; Dummer PM
    Int Endod J; 1995 Mar; 28(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 7665202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. In vitro radiographic determination of distances from working length files to root ends comparing Kodak RVG 6000, Schick CDR, and Kodak insight film.
    Radel RT; Goodell GG; McClanahan SB; Cohen ME
    J Endod; 2006 Jun; 32(6):566-8. PubMed ID: 16728253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Non-metallic grid for radiographic measurement.
    Krithika AC; Kandaswamy D; Velmurugan N; Krishna VG
    Aust Endod J; 2008 Apr; 34(1):36-8. PubMed ID: 18352902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Radiography in endodontics.
    Bridgman JB; Campbell DJ
    N Z Dent J; 1995 Jun; 91(404):62-4. PubMed ID: 7675349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Receiver operating characteristics of RadioVisioGraphy.
    Dagenais ME; Clark BG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Feb; 79(2):238-45. PubMed ID: 7614189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Radiographic and electronic diagnostic systems.
    McDonald NJ
    Alpha Omegan; 1991; 84(4):45-8. PubMed ID: 1819963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [The measurement parameters in dental radiography: a comparison between traditional and digital technics].
    Lazzerini F; Minorati D; Nessi R; Gagliani M; Uslenghi CM
    Radiol Med; 1996 Apr; 91(4):364-9. PubMed ID: 8643845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Estimating distances on direct digital images and conventional radiographs.
    Versteeg KH; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1997 Apr; 128(4):439-43. PubMed ID: 9103793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dose reduction of two digital sensor systems measuring file lengths.
    Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van der Stelt PF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 May; 81(5):607-12. PubMed ID: 8734712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [In vitro comparison of root canal preparation with step-back technique and GT rotary file--a nickel-titanium engine driven rotary instrument system].
    Krajczár K; Tóth V; Nyárády Z; Szabó G
    Fogorv Sz; 2005 Jun; 98(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 16108416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of the radiographic appearance of root canal size to its actual diameter.
    Kuyk JK; Walton RE
    J Endod; 1990 Nov; 16(11):528-33. PubMed ID: 2084209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.