These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1813498)

  • 1. Sighting dominance and monovision distance binocular fusional ranges.
    McGill EC; Erickson P
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 Oct; 62(10):738-42. PubMed ID: 1813498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.
    Rajagopalan AS; Bennett ES; Lakshminarayanan V
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 16909087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of monovision lenses on the near-point range of single binocular vision.
    McGill EC; Erickson P
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 Nov; 62(11):828-31. PubMed ID: 1813510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An exploration of modified monovision with diffractive bifocal contact lenses.
    Freeman MH; Charman WN
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 Jul; 30(3):189-96. PubMed ID: 17289423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual comparison of an artificial pupil contact lens to monovision.
    García-Lázaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Radhakrishnan H; Albarrán-Diego C; Montés-Micó R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Jul; 89(7):E1022-9. PubMed ID: 22729169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adaptation to multifocal and monovision contact lens correction.
    Fernandes PR; Neves HI; Lopes-Ferreira DP; Jorge JM; González-Meijome JM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Mar; 90(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 23376896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of multifocal and monovision soft contact lens corrections in patients with low-astigmatic presbyopia.
    Richdale K; Mitchell GL; Zadnik K
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 May; 83(5):266-73. PubMed ID: 16699438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors influencing success of monovision contact lens fitting: survey of contact lens diplomates.
    Westin E; Wick B; Harrist RB
    Optometry; 2000 Dec; 71(12):757-63. PubMed ID: 11145300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Monovision: a review.
    Evans BJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Sep; 27(5):417-39. PubMed ID: 17718882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual performance comparison between contact lens-based pinhole and simultaneous vision contact lenses.
    García-Lázaro S; Albarrán-Diego C; Ferrer-Blasco T; Radhakrishnan H; Montés-Micó R
    Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Jan; 96(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 22957771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The influence of ocular dominance on monovision--the interaction between binocular visual functions and the state of dominant eye's correction].
    Nitta M; Shimizu K; Niida T
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2007 Jun; 111(6):435-40. PubMed ID: 17601055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Role of visual acuity, stereoacuity, and ocular dominance in monovision patient success.
    Erickson P; McGill EC
    Optom Vis Sci; 1992 Oct; 69(10):761-4. PubMed ID: 1436996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of near visual acuity and reading metrics in presbyopia correction.
    Gupta N; Wolffsohn JS; Naroo SA
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Aug; 35(8):1401-9. PubMed ID: 19631128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monovision in LASIK.
    Braun EH; Lee J; Steinert RF
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Jul; 115(7):1196-202. PubMed ID: 18061266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual comparison of multifocal contact lens to monovision.
    Gupta N; Naroo SA; Wolffsohn JS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Feb; 86(2):E98-105. PubMed ID: 19156009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Binocular function and patient satisfaction after monovision induced by laser in situ keratomileusis (lasik)].
    Levinger E; Geyer O; Baltinsky Y; Levinger S
    Harefuah; 2006 Mar; 145(3):186-90, 246-7. PubMed ID: 16599313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability of rotary prism fusional vergence ranges.
    Penisten DK; Hofstetter HW; Goss DA
    Optometry; 2001 Feb; 72(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 11243428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison between "readables" aspheric spectacle lenses and conventional spherical spectacle lenses for overcorrection of presbyopic single-vision contact lens wearers.
    Bachman WG
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1993 Mar; 64(3):206-9. PubMed ID: 8454839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of sensory ocular dominance on through-focus visual performance in monovision presbyopia corrections.
    Zheleznyak L; Alarcon A; Dieter KC; Tadin D; Yoon G
    J Vis; 2015; 15(6):17. PubMed ID: 26024464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vertical imbalance induced by prism-ballasted soft toric contact lenses fitted unilaterally.
    Nilsson M; Stevenson SB; Leach N; Bergmanson JP; Brautaset RL
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Mar; 28(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 18339047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.