These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1813597)

  • 1. Strategy changes in human contingency judgments as a function of contingency tables.
    Shimazaki T; Tsuda Y; Imada H
    J Gen Psychol; 1991 Oct; 118(4):349-60. PubMed ID: 1813597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Judgments of causal efficacy under constant and changing interevent contingencies.
    Katagiri M; Kao SF; Simon AM; Castro L; Wasserman EA
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):251-64. PubMed ID: 17029817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: sadder but wiser?
    Alloy LB; Abramson LY
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1979 Dec; 108(4):441-85. PubMed ID: 528910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The psychophysics of contingency assessment.
    Allan LG; Hannah SD; Crump MJ; Siegel S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 May; 137(2):226-43. PubMed ID: 18473655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Causal judgment from contingency information: relation between subjective reports and individual tendencies in judgment.
    White PA
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Apr; 28(3):415-26. PubMed ID: 10881559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Aging and the detection of contingency in causal learning.
    Mutter SA; Williams TW
    Psychol Aging; 2004 Mar; 19(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 15065928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accounting for occurrences: a new view of the use of contingency information in causal judgment.
    White PA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):204-18. PubMed ID: 18194063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical contingency has a different impact on preparation judgements than on causal judgements.
    De Houwer J; Vandorpe S; Beckers T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):418-32. PubMed ID: 17366309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Base rates, contingencies, and prediction behavior.
    Kareev Y; Fiedler K; Avrahami J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):371-80. PubMed ID: 19271852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [On the validity of applying associative learning model to the acquisition process of human contingency judgment].
    Shimazaki T
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1999 Dec; 70(5):409-16. PubMed ID: 10756589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of assessment type on verbal ratings of conditional stimulus valence and contingency judgments: implications for the extinction of evaluative learning.
    Lipp OV; Purkis HM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Oct; 32(4):431-40. PubMed ID: 17044745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The consequences of surrendering a degree of freedom to the participant in a contingency assessment task.
    Hannah S; Allan LG; Siegel S
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):265-73. PubMed ID: 17081705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recency and primacy in causal judgments: effects of probe question and context switch on latent inhibition and extinction.
    Glautier S
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Sep; 36(6):1087-93. PubMed ID: 18927027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the role of causal intervention in multiple-cue judgment: positive and negative effects on learning.
    Enkvist T; Newell B; Juslin P; Olsson H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):163-79. PubMed ID: 16478348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Probability judgment in hierarchical learning: a conflict between predictiveness and coherence.
    Lagnado DA; Shanks DR
    Cognition; 2002 Feb; 83(1):81-112. PubMed ID: 11814487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Temporal contiguity and contingency judgments: a Pavlovian analogue.
    Allan LG; Tangen JM; Wood R; Shah T
    Integr Physiol Behav Sci; 2003; 38(3):214-29. PubMed ID: 15070084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Depressive realism and the effect of intertrial interval on judgements of zero, positive, and negative contingencies.
    Msetfi RM; Murphy RA; Simpson J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):461-81. PubMed ID: 17366312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contingency bias in probability judgement may arise from ambiguity regarding additional causes.
    Mitchell CJ; Griffiths O; More P; Lovibond PF
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013 Sep; 66(9):1675-86. PubMed ID: 23350876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contributions of specific cell information to judgments of interevent contingency.
    Wasserman EA; Dorner WW; Kao SF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 May; 16(3):509-21. PubMed ID: 2140406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Judgment of contingency: cognitive biases in depressed and nondepressed subjects.
    Vázquez C
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1987 Feb; 52(2):419-31. PubMed ID: 3559899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.