These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. The effect of setting time on the clinical performance of a high-copper amalgam alloy. Osborne JW; Berry TG Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 8700764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical evaluation of high-copper dental amalgams with and without admixed indium. Johnson GH; Bales DJ; Powell LV Am J Dent; 1992 Feb; 5(1):39-41. PubMed ID: 1524741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A six year follow-up of three dental alloy restorations with different copper contents. van Dijken JW Swed Dent J; 1991; 15(6):259-64. PubMed ID: 1817352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Longevity of cusp-covered amalgams: survivals after 15 years. Smales RJ Oper Dent; 1991; 16(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 1784534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations. Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A 14-year clinical assessment of 12 amalgam alloys. Osborne JW; Norman RD; Gale EN Quintessence Int; 1991 Nov; 22(11):857-64. PubMed ID: 1812507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling. Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term monitoring of microleakage of different amalgams with different liners. Gallato A; Angnes G; Reis A; Loguercio AD J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):571-6. PubMed ID: 15942619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marginal failure of amalgam. Effect of alloy selection and bite forces. Dérand T Swed Dent J; 1983; 7(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 6576493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Longevity of conventional and bonded (sealed) amalgam restorations in a private general dental practice. Bonsor SJ; Chadwick RG Br Dent J; 2009 Jan; 206(2):E3; discussion 88-9. PubMed ID: 19148188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Time-dependent corrosion potential of newly-placed admixed dental amalgam restorations. Sutow EJ; Maillet WA; Taylor JC; Hall GC; Millar M Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):644-7. PubMed ID: 16901535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Compression resistance and creep of 2 high copper Mexican amalgam alloys]. Sánchez Flores I; Nava Romero J Pract Odontol; 1990 Sep; 11(9):35-8. PubMed ID: 2133502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results. Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Zinc-containing high copper amalgams: a 3-year clinical evaluation. Osborne JW; Berry TG Am J Dent; 1992 Feb; 5(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 1524742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months. Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of enamel-bonding, type of restoration, patient age and operator on the longevity of an anterior composite resin. Smales RJ Am J Dent; 1991 Jun; 4(3):130-3. PubMed ID: 1830747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]