184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1814145)
1. Human evoked potentials and the lateralization of a sound.
Picton TW; McEvoy LK; Champagne SC
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1991; 491():139-43; discussion 144. PubMed ID: 1814145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of stimulus parameters on human evoked potentials to shifts in the lateralization of a noise.
McEvoy LK; Picton TW; Champagne SC
Audiology; 1991; 30(5):286-302. PubMed ID: 1793389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Infant Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials to Lateralized Noise Shifts Produced by Changes in Interaural Time Difference.
Small SA; Ishida IM; Stapells DR
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 27505221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Right hemispheric dominance for echo suppression.
Spierer L; Bourquin NM; Tardif E; Murray MM; Clarke S
Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(2):465-72. PubMed ID: 18983863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Auditory evoked fields to variations of interaural time delay.
Soeta Y; Nakagawa S; Tonoike M
Neurosci Lett; 2005 Aug; 383(3):311-6. PubMed ID: 15955427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Independent or integrated processing of interaural time and level differences in human auditory cortex?
Altmann CF; Terada S; Kashino M; Goto K; Mima T; Fukuyama H; Furukawa S
Hear Res; 2014 Jun; 312():121-7. PubMed ID: 24709274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Neuromagnetic responses associated with perceptual segregation of pitch.
Johnson BW; Muthukumaraswamy SD; Hautus MJ; Gaetz WC; Cheyne DO
Neurol Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 2004():33. PubMed ID: 16012630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sound lateralization and interaural discrimination. Effects of brainstem infarcts and multiple sclerosis lesions.
Furst M; Aharonson V; Levine RA; Fullerton BC; Tadmor R; Pratt H; Polyakov A; Korczyn AD
Hear Res; 2000 May; 143(1-2):29-42. PubMed ID: 10771182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Progress in neurophysiology of sound localization.
Phillips DP; Brugge JF
Annu Rev Psychol; 1985; 36():245-74. PubMed ID: 3883890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Processing of binaural spatial information in human auditory cortex: neuromagnetic responses to interaural timing and level differences.
Johnson BW; Hautus MJ
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2610-9. PubMed ID: 20466010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of center frequency on binaural auditory filter bandwidth in the human brain.
Soeta Y; Shimokura R; Nakagawa S
Neuroreport; 2008 Nov; 19(17):1709-13. PubMed ID: 18841088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A novel type of auditory responses: temporal dynamics of 40-Hz steady-state responses induced by changes in sound localization.
Ross B
J Neurophysiol; 2008 Sep; 100(3):1265-77. PubMed ID: 18632891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of the binaural auditory filter in the human brain.
Soeta Y; Nakagawa S
Neuroreport; 2007 Dec; 18(18):1939-43. PubMed ID: 18007191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The timing of the processes underlying lateralization: psychophysical and evoked potential measures.
McEvoy LK; Picton TW; Champagne SC
Ear Hear; 1991 Dec; 12(6):389-98. PubMed ID: 1797606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Trading of dynamic interaural time and level difference cues and its effect on the auditory motion-onset response measured with electroencephalography.
Altmann CF; Ueda R; Bucher B; Furukawa S; Ono K; Kashino M; Mima T; Fukuyama H
Neuroimage; 2017 Oct; 159():185-194. PubMed ID: 28756239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Late auditory evoked potentials asymmetry revisited.
Hine J; Debener S
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Jun; 118(6):1274-85. PubMed ID: 17462945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Objective diagnosis of central auditory processing and perception disorder].
Delb W
HNO; 2003 Feb; 51(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 12589414
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Auditory cortex activation associated with octave illusion.
Lamminmäki S; Hari R
Neuroreport; 2000 May; 11(7):1469-72. PubMed ID: 10841359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Human cortical representation of virtual auditory space: differences between sound azimuth and elevation.
Fujiki N; Riederer KA; Jousmäki V; Mäkelä JP; Hari R
Eur J Neurosci; 2002 Dec; 16(11):2207-13. PubMed ID: 12473088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Responsiveness of the human auditory cortex to degraded speech sounds: reduction of amplitude resolution vs. additive noise.
Miettinen I; Alku P; Salminen N; May PJ; Tiitinen H
Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 1367():298-309. PubMed ID: 20969833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
