These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1814348)

  • 1. Comparison of resistance features for complex amalgam restorations.
    Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Kaiser DA; Rux HW; Dutton FB
    Am J Dent; 1991 Dec; 4(6):268-72. PubMed ID: 1814348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fracture resistance of complex amalgam restorations.
    Burgess JO; Alvarez A; Summitt JB
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(3):128-32. PubMed ID: 9484151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retention of complex amalgam restorations using self-threading pins, amalgapins, and Amalgambond.
    Imbery TA; Hilton TJ; Reagan SE
    Am J Dent; 1995 Jun; 8(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 8599585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fracture resistance of extensive amalgam restorations retained by pins, amalgapins and amalgam bonding agents.
    Imbery TA; Coudron J; Moon PC
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(6):666-74. PubMed ID: 19051860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of distribution of resistance features in complex amalgam restorations.
    Summitt JB; Rindler EA; Robbins JW; Burgess JO
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 8008611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of grooves on resistance/retention form of Class 2 approximal slot amalgam restorations.
    Summitt JB; Osborne JW; Burgess JO
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(5):209-13. PubMed ID: 8152991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retention and resistance provided by nine self-threading pins.
    Burgess JO; Summitt JB
    Oper Dent; 1991; 16(2):55-60. PubMed ID: 1803329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Support of undermined occlusal enamel provided by restorative materials.
    Latino C; Troendle K; Summitt JB
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Apr; 32(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 12066648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Lindemuth JS; Hagge MS; Broome JS
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Strength of amalgam restorations bonded with Amalgambond.
    Ianzano JA; Mastrodomenico J; Gwinnett AJ
    Am J Dent; 1993 Feb; 6(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 8329154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of retentiveness of amalgam bonding agent types.
    Winkler MM; Moore BK; Allen J; Rhodes B
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(5):200-8. PubMed ID: 9484142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of bonded amalgam restorations on the fracture strength of teeth.
    Oliveira JP; Cochran MA; Moore BK
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):110-5. PubMed ID: 9002870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fracture strength of amalgam crowns with repaired endodontic access.
    Hachmeister KA; Dunn WJ; Murchison DF; Larsen RB
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):254-8. PubMed ID: 12022456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class II bonded amalgam and new tooth-colored restorations.
    Görücü J; Ozgünaltay G
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):501-7. PubMed ID: 14531594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Early fracture resistance of amalgapin-retained complex amalgam restorations.
    Schulte GA; Hermesch CB; Vandewalle KS; Buikema DJ
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(3):108-12. PubMed ID: 9656920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of bonded restorations on the fracture resistance of root filled teeth.
    Sagsen B; Aslan B
    Int Endod J; 2006 Nov; 39(11):900-4. PubMed ID: 17014529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Six-year clinical evaluation of bonded and pin-retained complex amalgam restorations.
    Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Berry TG; Robbins JW; Osborne JW; Haveman CW
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 15195725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fracture resistance of complex amalgam restorations with peripheral shelves used as resistance features.
    Reagan SE; Gray SE; Hilton TJ
    Am J Dent; 1993 Oct; 6(5):225-8. PubMed ID: 7880463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of amalgam bonding on resistance form of Class II amalgam restorations.
    Della Bona A; Summitt JB
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Feb; 29(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 9643242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.