BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1814417)

  • 1. Acceptability ratings and intelligibility scores of alaryngeal speakers by three listener groups.
    Bridges A
    Br J Disord Commun; 1991 Dec; 26(3):325-35. PubMed ID: 1814417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intelligibility of dysarthric speech: perceptions of speakers and listeners.
    Walshe M; Miller N; Leahy M; Murray A
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2008; 43(6):633-48. PubMed ID: 18608608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intelligibility of oesophageal and tracheo-oesophageal speech: preliminary observations.
    Max L; De Bruyn W; Steurs W
    Eur J Disord Commun; 1997; 32(4):429-40. PubMed ID: 9519117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of the speech acceptability of good and excellent esophageal and tracheoesophageal speakers.
    Trudeau MD
    J Commun Disord; 1987 Feb; 20(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 3819002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Effect of Clear Speech on Cantonese Alaryngeal Speakers' Intelligibility.
    Hui TF; Cox SR; Huang T; Chen WR; Ng ML
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2022; 74(2):103-111. PubMed ID: 34333487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech intelligibility, acceptability, and communication-related quality of life in Chinese alaryngeal speakers.
    Law IK; Ma EP; Yiu EM
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Jul; 135(7):704-11. PubMed ID: 19620593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perception of pitch contours in single words in alaryngeal speech.
    Bridges A
    Br J Disord Commun; 1991 Dec; 26(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 1814416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences in speaking proficiencies in three laryngectomee groups.
    Williams SE; Watson JB
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1985 Apr; 111(4):216-9. PubMed ID: 3977752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech intelligibility in tone language (Chinese) laryngectomy speakers.
    Yiu EM; van Hasselt CA; Williams SR; Woo JK
    Eur J Disord Commun; 1994; 29(4):339-47. PubMed ID: 7647385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acceptability ratings of tracheoesophageal speech.
    Pindzola RH; Cain BH
    Laryngoscope; 1988 Apr; 98(4):394-7. PubMed ID: 3352438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perception of stop consonants produced by esophageal and tracheoesophageal speakers.
    Gomyo Y; Doyle PC
    J Otolaryngol; 1989 Jun; 18(4):184-8. PubMed ID: 2739001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Listener impressions of alaryngeal communication modalities.
    Knollhoff SM; Borrie SA; Barrett TS; Searl JP
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2021 Oct; 23(5):540-547. PubMed ID: 33501872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Listener effort for highly intelligible tracheoesophageal speech.
    Nagle KF; Eadie TL
    J Commun Disord; 2012; 45(3):235-45. PubMed ID: 22305772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceptual comparison of neoglottal, oesophageal and normal speech.
    Ainsworth WA; Singh W
    Folia Phoniatr (Basel); 1992; 44(6):297-307. PubMed ID: 1286842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Individual speaker influence on relative intelligibility of esophageal speech and artificial larynx speech.
    Kalb MB; Carpenter MA
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1981 Feb; 46(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 7206682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acceptability and intelligibility of tracheoesophageal speech.
    Tardy-Mitzell S; Andrews ML; Bowman SA
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1985 Apr; 111(4):213-5. PubMed ID: 3977751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Lombard effect associated with Chinese male alaryngeal speech.
    Ng ML; Tsang GCK
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2019 Dec; 21(6):584-592. PubMed ID: 30732483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of listener sophistication on judgements of tracheoesophageal talker intelligibility.
    Doyle PC; Swift ER; Haaf RG
    J Commun Disord; 1989 Apr; 22(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 2723141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of the Lombard Effect in Improving Alaryngeal Speech.
    Ng ML
    J Voice; 2021 Jan; 35(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 31350113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prosodic boundaries in alaryngeal speech.
    van Rossum MA; Quené H; Nooteboom SG
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2008 Mar; 22(3):215-31. PubMed ID: 18307086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.