These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18145028)

  • 1. The natural science ideal in the social sciences.
    BECK LW
    Sci Mon; 1949 Jun; 68(6):386-94. PubMed ID: 18145028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reflections on the disciplinary gulf between the natural and social sciences.
    Wright S
    Community Genet; 2006; 9(3):161-9. PubMed ID: 16741345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Social Science. Gender inequality in science.
    Penner AM
    Science; 2015 Jan; 347(6219):234-5. PubMed ID: 25593174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Time for the social sciences.
    Nature; 2015 Jan; 517(7532):5. PubMed ID: 25557694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Research thrives on integration of natural and social sciences.
    Fisher E; Biggs S; Lindsay S; Zhao J
    Nature; 2010 Feb; 463(7284):1018. PubMed ID: 20182491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The three cultures and health care reform.
    Bryan CS
    J S C Med Assoc; 2009 Oct; 105(6):208-9. PubMed ID: 19998724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Earth system research priorities.
    Reid WV; Bréchignac C; Tseh Lee Y
    Science; 2009 Jul; 325(5938):245. PubMed ID: 19608879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mobilisation for public engagement: Benchmarking the practices of research institutes.
    Entradas M; Bauer MM
    Public Underst Sci; 2017 Oct; 26(7):771-788. PubMed ID: 26951156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Erciyes University students' knowledge about AIDS: differences between students of natural and social science.
    Taşci S; Başer M; Mucuk S; Bayat M; Zincir H; Sungur G
    Behav Med; 2008; 33(4):151-5. PubMed ID: 18316273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. WOMEN IN SCIENCE. Comment on "Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines".
    Ginther DK; Kahn S
    Science; 2015 Jul; 349(6246):391. PubMed ID: 26206926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mind the gap: future depends on sciences and humanities.
    Manning AD; Fischer J
    Nature; 2010 Jan; 463(7280):425. PubMed ID: 20110971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of a measure to evaluate competence perceptions of natural and social science.
    Kirby CK; Jaimes P; Lorenz-Reaves AR; Libarkin JC
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0209311. PubMed ID: 30601856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Social and natural sciences differ in their research strategies, adapted to work for different knowledge landscapes.
    Jaffe K
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e113901. PubMed ID: 25426723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can biosemiotics be a "science" if its purpose is to be a bridge between the natural, social and human sciences?
    Brier S
    Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2015 Dec; 119(3):576-87. PubMed ID: 26260778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. WOMEN IN SCIENCE. Response to Comment on "Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines".
    Cimpian A; Leslie SJ
    Science; 2015 Jul; 349(6246):391. PubMed ID: 26206927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A critical juncture for synthetic biology: Lessons from nanotechnology could inform public discourse and further development of synthetic biology.
    Trump BD; Cegan JC; Wells E; Keisler J; Linkov I
    EMBO Rep; 2018 Jul; 19(7):. PubMed ID: 29895710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interdisciplinary Collaboration between Natural and Social Sciences - Status and Trends Exemplified in Groundwater Research.
    Barthel R; Seidl R
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0170754. PubMed ID: 28129352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Futures for bioethics?
    Ashcroft R
    Bioethics; 2010 Jun; 24(5):ii. PubMed ID: 20500757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. "Positive" results increase down the Hierarchy of the Sciences.
    Fanelli D
    PLoS One; 2010 Apr; 5(4):e10068. PubMed ID: 20383332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Apples with oranges? Comparison of scientometric indicators between fields].
    Schubert A
    Orv Hetil; 2016 Apr; 157(16):631-4. PubMed ID: 27063431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.