These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1814726)
1. [A long-term study of amalgam and composite fillings]. Pieper K; Meyer G; Marienhagen B; Motsch A Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Mar; 46(3):222-5. PubMed ID: 1814726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Amalgam fillings in the deciduous and mixed dentition--a post-treatment evaluation of service life and quality]. Pieper K; Beinhauer A; Redeker M Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Sep; 46(9):606-8. PubMed ID: 1817941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Clinical evaluation of the quality of amalgam and polymer filling materials after various periods of function. A study of servicemen of the German armed forces]. Pieper K; Mausberg R; Curdt R; Uhde V Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Sep; 44(9):707-10. PubMed ID: 2637851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of wear and clinical performance between amalgam, composite and open sandwich restorations: 2-year results. Sachdeo A; Gray GB; Sulieman MA; Jagger DC Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2004 Mar; 12(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 15058177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ten-year clinical assessment of three posterior resin composites and two amalgams. Mair LH Quintessence Int; 1998 Aug; 29(8):483-90. PubMed ID: 9807127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of restorative materials on marginal gingiva. Willershausen B; Köttgen C; Ernst CP Eur J Med Res; 2001 Oct; 6(10):433-9. PubMed ID: 11698230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations. Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The abrasion of composites in the region of the lateral teeth--results after 3 years]. Roulet JF; Mettler P; Friedrich U Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1980 Apr; 35(4):493-7. PubMed ID: 6997011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations. Hickel R; Manhart J; García-Godoy F Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):41D-54D. PubMed ID: 11763918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Amalgam. IX. Substitute for amalgam: durability of composite restorations]. Schuurs AH; van Amerongen JP Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1993 Oct; 100(10):437-41. PubMed ID: 11822139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations. Duncalf WV; Wilson NH Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcome of direct restorations placed within the general dental services in England and Wales (Part 1): variation by type of restoration and re-intervention. Lucarotti PS; Holder RL; Burke FJ J Dent; 2005 Nov; 33(10):805-15. PubMed ID: 16221519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]