These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18147978)

  • 1. Generalization of secondary reinforcement from the primary drive.
    ESTES WK
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1949 Aug; 42(4):286-95. PubMed ID: 18147978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comment on Estes' study Generalization of secondary reinforcement from the primary drive.
    MOWRER OH
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1950 Apr; 43(2):148-51. PubMed ID: 15415481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reinforcement and drive level determinants of expectancy generalization.
    HEATH D
    J Gen Psychol; 1962 Jul; 67():69-82. PubMed ID: 13905781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Studies in secondary reinforcement. II. Secondary reinforcement as a function of the strength of drive during primary reinforcement.
    HALL JF
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1951 Oct; 44(5):462-6. PubMed ID: 14888740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of the secondary reinforcing agents on the primary thirst drive.
    SIMON CW; WICKENS DD; BROWN U; PENNOCK L
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1951 Feb; 44(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 14814242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Secondary reinforcement and multiple drive reduction.
    WIKE EL; BARRIENTOS G
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1958 Oct; 51(5):640-3. PubMed ID: 13587701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of drive on learning with secondary reinforcement.
    BROWN JL
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1956 Jun; 49(3):254-60. PubMed ID: 13332123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A test for generalized secondary reinforcement during extinction under a different drive.
    REID LS; SLIVINSKE AJ
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1954 Aug; 47(4):306-10. PubMed ID: 13192224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of drive intensity on secondary reinforcement.
    WIKE EL; FARROW BJ
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1962 Dec; 55():1020-3. PubMed ID: 14000629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An evaluation of generalization of mands during functional communication training.
    Falcomata TS; Wacker DP; Ringdahl JE; Vinquist K; Dutt A
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2013; 46(2):444-54. PubMed ID: 24114159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. STIMULUS GENERALIZATION AND THE RESPONSE-REINFORCEMENT CONTINGENCY.
    HEARST E; KORESKO MB; POPPEN R
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1964 Sep; 7(5):369-80. PubMed ID: 14218295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CONDITIONING AND GENERALIZATION OF INFLUENCE BEHAVIOR.
    AIKEN EG
    Percept Mot Skills; 1965 Feb; 20():159-65. PubMed ID: 14286507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Runway performance as a function of drive strength and magnitude of reinforcement.
    KINTSCH W
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1962 Oct; 55():882-7. PubMed ID: 14032937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The etymology of basic concepts in the experimental analysis of behavior.
    Dinsmoor JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2004 Nov; 82(3):311-6. PubMed ID: 15693525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Extinction following partial reinforcement with control of stimulus-generalization and secondary reinforcement.
    TYLER DW
    Am J Psychol; 1956 Sep; 69(3):359-68. PubMed ID: 13354797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Latent learning under irrelevant drive and without reinforcement.
    MEYER ME
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1961 Aug; 54():442-4. PubMed ID: 13770013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. AGE DIFFERENCES IN SPATIAL-STIMULUS GENERALIZATION.
    CANESTRARI RE
    J Genet Psychol; 1965 Mar; 106():129-35. PubMed ID: 14273706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. PREDICTION OF DISCRIMINATION FROM GENERALIZATION AFTER VARIATIONS IN SCHEDULE OF REINFORCEMENT.
    HABER A; KALISH HI
    Science; 1963 Oct; 142(3590):412-3. PubMed ID: 14056717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Regression in schizophrenics as a function of censure, reinforcement cues, and response habit hierarchies.
    Schenck HU; Surber C
    J Genet Psychol; 1974 Mar; 124(1st Half):69-77. PubMed ID: 4823579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Force-contingent reinforcement in instrumental conditioning and extinction in children: a test of the frustration-drive hypothesis.
    Blixt S; Ley R
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1969 Oct; 69(2):267-72. PubMed ID: 5404457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.