These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1815000)
1. The effect of excessive add power on the acceptance of progressive addition lenses. Cho MH; Spear CH; Caplan L J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 Sep; 62(9):672-5. PubMed ID: 1815000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A clinical study of patient acceptance and satisfaction of Varilux Plus and Varilux Infinity lenses. Cho MH; Barnette CB; Aiken B; Shipp M J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 Jun; 62(6):449-53. PubMed ID: 1813540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Subjective evaluation of a new multi-design progressive lens. Gresset J J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 Sep; 62(9):691-8. PubMed ID: 1815003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative study of the Seiko P-3 and Varilux 2 progressive addition lenses. Brookman KE; Hall EA; Jensen MJ J Am Optom Assoc; 1988 May; 59(5):406-10. PubMed ID: 3397493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Double masked study of progressive addition lenses. Borish IM; Hitzeman SA; Brookman KE J Am Optom Assoc; 1980 Oct; 51(10):933-43. PubMed ID: 7005296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical assessment of a customized free-form progressive add lens spectacle. Han SC; Graham AD; Lin MC Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Feb; 88(2):234-43. PubMed ID: 21217408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Acceptance of progressive lenses]. Krause K Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1996; 209(2-3):94-9. PubMed ID: 8992091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison between "readables" aspheric spectacle lenses and conventional spherical spectacle lenses for overcorrection of presbyopic single-vision contact lens wearers. Bachman WG J Am Optom Assoc; 1993 Mar; 64(3):206-9. PubMed ID: 8454839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the acceptance of progressive addition multifocals with blended bifocals. Borish IM; Hitzeman SA J Am Optom Assoc; 1983 May; 54(5):415-22. PubMed ID: 6345640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the acceptance of progressive addition multifocal vs. a standard multifocal lens design. Hitzeman SA; Myers CO J Am Optom Assoc; 1985 Sep; 56(9):706-10. PubMed ID: 4056293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Progressive addition lenses. Jan D J Am Optom Assoc; 1989 Jan; 60(1):9. PubMed ID: 2915112 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Hong Kong progressive lens myopia control study: study design and main findings. Edwards MH; Li RW; Lam CS; Lew JK; Yu BS Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Sep; 43(9):2852-8. PubMed ID: 12202502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Medical practice experiences with Varilux. (Report on 69 patients)]. Bruens E Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1967 Nov; 151(5):737-51. PubMed ID: 5597435 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical comparison of the TruVision Omni and four progressive addition lenses. Wittenberg S; Richmond PN; Cohen-Setton J; Winter RR J Am Optom Assoc; 1989 Feb; 60(2):114-21. PubMed ID: 2703652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optical and visual performance of aspheric soft contact lenses. Efron S; Efron N; Morgan PB Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 85(3):201-10. PubMed ID: 18317336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A critical view of presbyopic add determination. Hanlon SD; Nakabayashi J; Shigezawa G J Am Optom Assoc; 1987 Jun; 58(6):468-72. PubMed ID: 3624744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]