These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1815423)

  • 1. Clinical evaluation of a finger oscillometric blood pressure device.
    Sesler JM; Munroe WP; McKenney JM
    DICP; 1991 Dec; 25(12):1310-4. PubMed ID: 1815423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Oscillometric finger blood pressure versus brachial auscultative blood pressure recording.
    Iyriboz Y
    J Fam Pract; 1990 Oct; 31(4):376-80. PubMed ID: 2212968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inaccuracy of the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer.
    O'Brien E; Mee F; Atkins N; O'Malley K
    Lancet; 1990 Dec; 336(8729):1465-8. PubMed ID: 1979092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Blood pressure randomized methodology study comparing automatic oscillometric and mercury sphygmomanometer devices: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2010.
    Ostchega Y; Zhang G; Sorlie P; Hughes JP; Reed-Gillette DS; Nwankwo T; Yoon S
    Natl Health Stat Report; 2012 Oct; (59):1-15. PubMed ID: 24984529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of oscillometric blood pressure measurements at the wrist with an upper-arm auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer.
    Rogers P; Burke V; Stroud P; Puddey IB
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 1999; 26(5-6):477-81. PubMed ID: 10386242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Random zero sphygmomanometer versus automatic oscillometric blood pressure monitor; is either the instrument of choice?
    Goonasekera CD; Dillon MJ
    J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Nov; 9(11):885-9. PubMed ID: 8583467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The accuracy and performance of the A&D TM 2421, a new ambulatory blood pressure monitoring device based on the cuff-oscillometric method and the Korotkoff sound technique.
    Imai Y; Sasaki S; Minami N; Munakata M; Hashimoto J; Sakuma H; Sakuma M; Watanabe N; Imai K; Sekino H
    Am J Hypertens; 1992 Oct; 5(10):719-26. PubMed ID: 1418835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The CNAP™ Finger Cuff for Noninvasive Beat-To-Beat Monitoring of Arterial Blood Pressure: An Evaluation in Intensive Care Unit Patients and a Comparison with 2 Intermittent Devices.
    Lakhal K; Martin M; Faiz S; Ehrmann S; Blanloeil Y; Asehnoune K; Rozec B; Boulain T
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Nov; 123(5):1126-1135. PubMed ID: 27159068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Arterial stiffness as underlying mechanism of disagreement between an oscillometric blood pressure monitor and a sphygmomanometer.
    van Popele NM; Bos WJ; de Beer NA; van Der Kuip DA; Hofman A; Grobbee DE; Witteman JC
    Hypertension; 2000 Oct; 36(4):484-8. PubMed ID: 11040223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study.
    Ni H; Wu C; Prineas R; Shea S; Liu K; Kronmal R; Bild D
    Am J Hypertens; 2006 Apr; 19(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 16580569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring during pregnancy. Comparison with mercury sphygmomanometry.
    Brown MA; Buddle ML; Cario GM; Whitworth JA
    Am J Hypertens; 1993 Sep; 6(9):745-9. PubMed ID: 8110427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of blood pressure measurements between an automated oscillometric device and a Hawksley random-zero sphygmomanometer in the northern Sweden MONICA study.
    Eriksson M; Carlberg B; Jansson JH
    Blood Press Monit; 2012 Aug; 17(4):164-70. PubMed ID: 22781634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Blood pressure monitoring with home monitors versus mercury sphygmomanometer.
    Rotch AL; Dean JO; Kendrach MG; Wright SG; Woolley TW
    Ann Pharmacother; 2001; 35(7-8):817-22. PubMed ID: 11485126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressures.
    Park MK; Menard SW; Yuan C
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2001 Jan; 155(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 11177062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A perfect replacement for the mercury sphygmomanometer: the case of the hybrid blood pressure monitor.
    Stergiou GS; Karpettas N; Kollias A; Destounis A; Tzamouranis D
    J Hum Hypertens; 2012 Apr; 26(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 21900952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Noninvasive Blood Pressure Measurement in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients: Comparison of Agreement between Oscillometric and Finger-Cuff Methods.
    Alfano G; Fontana F; Cappelli G
    Nephron; 2017; 136(4):309-317. PubMed ID: 28468005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of aneroid and oscillometric blood pressure measurements in children.
    Eliasdottir SB; Steinthorsdottir SD; Indridason OS; Palsson R; Edvardsson VO
    J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2013 Nov; 15(11):776-83. PubMed ID: 24112661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Agreement between finger plethysmography- and brachial oscillometry-derived blood pressure measurements.
    Allan PD; O'Donnell T; Tzeng YC
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2018 May; 38(3):439-446. PubMed ID: 28444896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using semi-automated oscillometric blood pressure measurement in diabetic patients and their offspring.
    Kuo CS; Hwu CM; Kwok CF; Hsiao LC; Weih MJ; Lee SH; Ho LT
    J Diabetes Complications; 2000; 14(5):288-93. PubMed ID: 11113693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auscultatory versus oscillometric measurement of blood pressure in octogenarians.
    Rosholm JU; Arnspang S; Matzen L; Jacobsen IA
    Blood Press; 2012 Oct; 21(5):269-72. PubMed ID: 22545576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.