471 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18154928)
1. POSSUM accurately predicts morbidity for pancreatic resection.
Pratt W; Joseph S; Callery MP; Vollmer CM
Surgery; 2008 Jan; 143(1):8-19. PubMed ID: 18154928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimal surgical performance attenuates physiologic risk in high-acuity operations.
Pratt W; Callery MP; Vollmer CM
J Am Coll Surg; 2008 Nov; 207(5):717-30. PubMed ID: 18954785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Critical appraisal of 232 consecutive distal pancreatectomies with emphasis on risk factors, outcome, and management of the postoperative pancreatic fistula: a 21-year experience at a single institution.
Goh BK; Tan YM; Chung YF; Cheow PC; Ong HS; Chan WH; Chow PK; Soo KC; Wong WK; Ooi LL
Arch Surg; 2008 Oct; 143(10):956-65. PubMed ID: 18936374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is age a risk factor for major pancreatic surgery? An analysis of 300 resections.
Bottger TC; Engelmann R; Junginger T
Hepatogastroenterology; 1999; 46(28):2589-98. PubMed ID: 10522047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality assessment in high-acuity surgery: volume and mortality are not enough.
Vollmer CM; Pratt W; Vanounou T; Maithel SK; Callery MP
Arch Surg; 2007 Apr; 142(4):371-80. PubMed ID: 17438173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Should elective surgery for chronic pancreatitis be performed in high-risk patients?
Schnelldorfer T; Adams DB
Am Surg; 2006 Jul; 72(7):592-7; discussion 597-8. PubMed ID: 16875080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The POSSUM scoring system for risks assessment in pancreatoduodenectomy].
Tian BL; Zhang ZD; Liu XB; Hu WM; Mai G; Zeng Y; Li ZJ; Zhang Y; Le XH; Lu HM
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Jun; 47(11):814-7. PubMed ID: 19961009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. POSSUM, p-POSSUM, and Cr-POSSUM: implementation issues in a United States health care system for prediction of outcome for colon cancer resection.
Senagore AJ; Warmuth AJ; Delaney CP; Tekkis PP; Fazio VW
Dis Colon Rectum; 2004 Sep; 47(9):1435-41. PubMed ID: 15486738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: A novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.
DeOliveira ML; Winter JM; Schafer M; Cunningham SC; Cameron JL; Yeo CJ; Clavien PA
Ann Surg; 2006 Dec; 244(6):931-7; discussion 937-9. PubMed ID: 17122618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk factors for mortality and intra-abdominal complications after pancreatoduodenectomy: multivariate analysis in 300 patients.
Muscari F; Suc B; Kirzin S; Hay JM; Fourtanier G; Fingerhut A; Sastre B; Chipponi J; Fagniez PL; Radovanovic A;
Surgery; 2006 May; 139(5):591-8. PubMed ID: 16701090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of surgical outcome scores according to ISGPS definitions in patients undergoing pancreatic resection.
Knight BC; Kausar A; Manu M; Ammori BA; Sherlock DJ; O'Reilly DA
Dig Surg; 2010; 27(5):367-74. PubMed ID: 20938180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. POSSUM scoring for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly.
Tambyraja AL; Kumar S; Nixon SJ
ANZ J Surg; 2005 Jul; 75(7):550-2. PubMed ID: 15972044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The possum scoring system and complete blood count in the prediction of complications after pancreato-duodenal area resections.
Dębińska I; Smolińska K; Osiniak J; Paluszkiewicz P
Pol Przegl Chir; 2011 Jan; 83(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 22166237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of POSSUM scoring systems and the surgical risk scale in patients undergoing surgery for complicated diverticular disease.
Constantinides VA; Tekkis PP; Senapati A;
Dis Colon Rectum; 2006 Sep; 49(9):1322-31. PubMed ID: 16680607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. POSSUM, a potentially useful tool for prediction of morbidity in patients undergoing central pancreatectomy.
Dumitraşcu T; Barbu ST; Ionescu M; Popescu I
Chirurgia (Bucur); 2012; 107(4):447-53. PubMed ID: 23025110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pancreatic resection in Veterans Affairs and selected university medical centers: results of the patient safety in surgery study.
Glasgow RE; Jackson HH; Neumayer L; Schifftner TL; Khuri SF; Henderson WG; Mulvihill SJ
J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Jun; 204(6):1252-60. PubMed ID: 17544083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy.
Callery MP; Pratt WB; Kent TS; Chaikof EL; Vollmer CM
J Am Coll Surg; 2013 Jan; 216(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 23122535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the POSSUM score in surgical treatment of cholangiocarcinoma.
Hellmann S; Schafmayer C; Hinz S; Schniewind B; Tepel J; Broering DC; Egberts JH
Hepatogastroenterology; 2010; 57(99-100):403-8. PubMed ID: 20698198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the possum, P-POSSUM and Cr-POSSUM scoring systems as predictors of postoperative mortality in patients undergoing major colorectal surgery.
Vather R; Zargar-Shoshtari K; Adegbola S; Hill AG
ANZ J Surg; 2006 Sep; 76(9):812-6. PubMed ID: 16922904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. POSSUM and P-POSSUM for risk-adjusted audit of patients undergoing emergency laparotomy.
Mohil RS; Bhatnagar D; Bahadur L; Rajneesh ; Dev DK; Magan M
Br J Surg; 2004 Apr; 91(4):500-3. PubMed ID: 15048756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
