These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
464 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18154928)
1. POSSUM accurately predicts morbidity for pancreatic resection. Pratt W; Joseph S; Callery MP; Vollmer CM Surgery; 2008 Jan; 143(1):8-19. PubMed ID: 18154928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimal surgical performance attenuates physiologic risk in high-acuity operations. Pratt W; Callery MP; Vollmer CM J Am Coll Surg; 2008 Nov; 207(5):717-30. PubMed ID: 18954785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Critical appraisal of 232 consecutive distal pancreatectomies with emphasis on risk factors, outcome, and management of the postoperative pancreatic fistula: a 21-year experience at a single institution. Goh BK; Tan YM; Chung YF; Cheow PC; Ong HS; Chan WH; Chow PK; Soo KC; Wong WK; Ooi LL Arch Surg; 2008 Oct; 143(10):956-65. PubMed ID: 18936374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is age a risk factor for major pancreatic surgery? An analysis of 300 resections. Bottger TC; Engelmann R; Junginger T Hepatogastroenterology; 1999; 46(28):2589-98. PubMed ID: 10522047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality assessment in high-acuity surgery: volume and mortality are not enough. Vollmer CM; Pratt W; Vanounou T; Maithel SK; Callery MP Arch Surg; 2007 Apr; 142(4):371-80. PubMed ID: 17438173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Should elective surgery for chronic pancreatitis be performed in high-risk patients? Schnelldorfer T; Adams DB Am Surg; 2006 Jul; 72(7):592-7; discussion 597-8. PubMed ID: 16875080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The POSSUM scoring system for risks assessment in pancreatoduodenectomy]. Tian BL; Zhang ZD; Liu XB; Hu WM; Mai G; Zeng Y; Li ZJ; Zhang Y; Le XH; Lu HM Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Jun; 47(11):814-7. PubMed ID: 19961009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. POSSUM, p-POSSUM, and Cr-POSSUM: implementation issues in a United States health care system for prediction of outcome for colon cancer resection. Senagore AJ; Warmuth AJ; Delaney CP; Tekkis PP; Fazio VW Dis Colon Rectum; 2004 Sep; 47(9):1435-41. PubMed ID: 15486738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: A novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. DeOliveira ML; Winter JM; Schafer M; Cunningham SC; Cameron JL; Yeo CJ; Clavien PA Ann Surg; 2006 Dec; 244(6):931-7; discussion 937-9. PubMed ID: 17122618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk factors for mortality and intra-abdominal complications after pancreatoduodenectomy: multivariate analysis in 300 patients. Muscari F; Suc B; Kirzin S; Hay JM; Fourtanier G; Fingerhut A; Sastre B; Chipponi J; Fagniez PL; Radovanovic A; Surgery; 2006 May; 139(5):591-8. PubMed ID: 16701090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of surgical outcome scores according to ISGPS definitions in patients undergoing pancreatic resection. Knight BC; Kausar A; Manu M; Ammori BA; Sherlock DJ; O'Reilly DA Dig Surg; 2010; 27(5):367-74. PubMed ID: 20938180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. POSSUM scoring for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly. Tambyraja AL; Kumar S; Nixon SJ ANZ J Surg; 2005 Jul; 75(7):550-2. PubMed ID: 15972044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The possum scoring system and complete blood count in the prediction of complications after pancreato-duodenal area resections. Dębińska I; Smolińska K; Osiniak J; Paluszkiewicz P Pol Przegl Chir; 2011 Jan; 83(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 22166237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of POSSUM scoring systems and the surgical risk scale in patients undergoing surgery for complicated diverticular disease. Constantinides VA; Tekkis PP; Senapati A; Dis Colon Rectum; 2006 Sep; 49(9):1322-31. PubMed ID: 16680607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. POSSUM, a potentially useful tool for prediction of morbidity in patients undergoing central pancreatectomy. Dumitraşcu T; Barbu ST; Ionescu M; Popescu I Chirurgia (Bucur); 2012; 107(4):447-53. PubMed ID: 23025110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pancreatic resection in Veterans Affairs and selected university medical centers: results of the patient safety in surgery study. Glasgow RE; Jackson HH; Neumayer L; Schifftner TL; Khuri SF; Henderson WG; Mulvihill SJ J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Jun; 204(6):1252-60. PubMed ID: 17544083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. Callery MP; Pratt WB; Kent TS; Chaikof EL; Vollmer CM J Am Coll Surg; 2013 Jan; 216(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 23122535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the POSSUM score in surgical treatment of cholangiocarcinoma. Hellmann S; Schafmayer C; Hinz S; Schniewind B; Tepel J; Broering DC; Egberts JH Hepatogastroenterology; 2010; 57(99-100):403-8. PubMed ID: 20698198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the possum, P-POSSUM and Cr-POSSUM scoring systems as predictors of postoperative mortality in patients undergoing major colorectal surgery. Vather R; Zargar-Shoshtari K; Adegbola S; Hill AG ANZ J Surg; 2006 Sep; 76(9):812-6. PubMed ID: 16922904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. POSSUM and P-POSSUM for risk-adjusted audit of patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. Mohil RS; Bhatnagar D; Bahadur L; Rajneesh ; Dev DK; Magan M Br J Surg; 2004 Apr; 91(4):500-3. PubMed ID: 15048756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]