BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18155204)

  • 1. Jumbo forceps are superior to standard large-capacity forceps in obtaining diagnostically adequate inflammatory bowel disease surveillance biopsy specimens.
    Elmunzer BJ; Higgins PD; Kwon YM; Golembeski C; Greenson JK; Korsnes SJ; Elta GH
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Aug; 68(2):273-8; quiz 334, 336. PubMed ID: 18155204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Jumbo or large-capacity forceps for inflammatory bowel disease surveillance: is it truly important or just a marketing ploy?
    Enns R
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Aug; 68(2):279-82. PubMed ID: 18656596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of a new jumbo forceps improves tissue acquisition of Barrett's esophagus surveillance biopsies.
    Komanduri S; Swanson G; Keefer L; Jakate S
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Dec; 70(6):1072-8.e1. PubMed ID: 19595312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Pelican single-use multibite biopsy forceps and traditional double-bite forceps: evaluation in a porcine model.
    Zaidman JS; Frederick WG; Furth EE; Su CG; Ginsberg GG
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Oct; 64(4):582-8. PubMed ID: 16996354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chromoendoscopy-targeted biopsies are superior to standard colonoscopic surveillance for detecting dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease patients: a prospective endoscopic trial.
    Marion JF; Waye JD; Present DH; Israel Y; Bodian C; Harpaz N; Chapman M; Itzkowitz S; Steinlauf AF; Abreu MT; Ullman TA; Aisenberg J; Mayer L;
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Sep; 103(9):2342-9. PubMed ID: 18844620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improved specimen adequacy using jumbo biopsy forceps in patients with Barrett's esophagus.
    Martinek J; Maluskova J; Stefanova M; Tuckova I; Suchanek S; Vackova Z; Krajciova J; Kollar M; Zavoral M; Spicak J
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(17):5328-35. PubMed ID: 25954107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Randomized comparison of 3 different-sized biopsy forceps for quality of sampling in Barrett's esophagus.
    Gonzalez S; Yu WM; Smith MS; Slack KN; Rotterdam H; Abrams JA; Lightdale CJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Nov; 72(5):935-40. PubMed ID: 21034895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomized, controlled trial of standard, large-capacity versus jumbo biopsy forceps for polypectomy of small, sessile, colorectal polyps.
    Draganov PV; Chang MN; Alkhasawneh A; Dixon LR; Lieb J; Moshiree B; Polyak S; Sultan S; Collins D; Suman A; Valentine JF; Wagh MS; Habashi SL; Forsmark CE
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):118-26. PubMed ID: 22196811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surveillance for dysplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a national survey of colonoscopic practice in New Zealand.
    Gearry RB; Wakeman CJ; Barclay ML; Chapman BA; Collett JA; Burt MJ; Frizelle FA
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2004 Mar; 47(3):314-22. PubMed ID: 14991493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adequacy of mucosal sampling with the "two-bite" forceps technique: a prospective, randomized, blinded study.
    Padda S; Shah I; Ramirez FC
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2003 Feb; 57(2):170-3. PubMed ID: 12556778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-minimization analysis of jumbo reusable forceps versus disposable forceps in a high-volume ambulatory endoscopy center.
    Hogan RB; Santa-Cruz R; Weeks ES; Alexander L; Hogan RB
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Feb; 69(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 18725156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Narrow-band imaging as an alternative to chromoendoscopy for the detection of dysplasia in long-standing inflammatory bowel disease: a prospective, randomized, crossover study.
    Pellisé M; López-Cerón M; Rodríguez de Miguel C; Jimeno M; Zabalza M; Ricart E; Aceituno M; Fernández-Esparrach G; Ginès A; Sendino O; Cuatrecasas M; Llach J; Panés J
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Oct; 74(4):840-8. PubMed ID: 21802681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Endoscopy/surveillance in inflammatory bowel disease.
    Ahmadi AA; Polyak S
    Surg Clin North Am; 2007 Jun; 87(3):743-62. PubMed ID: 17560423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps for colorectal epithelial cell proliferation in humans.
    Sandler RS; Cummings MS; Keku TO; Terse A; Mehta N
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2000 Oct; 9(10):1123-5. PubMed ID: 11045798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Appropriateness of colonoscopy in Europe (EPAGE II). Chronic diarrhea and known inflammatory bowel disease.
    Schusselé Filliettaz S; Juillerat P; Burnand B; Arditi C; Windsor A; Beglinger C; Dubois RW; Peytremann-Bridevaux I; Pittet V; Gonvers JJ; Froehlich F; Vader JP;
    Endoscopy; 2009 Mar; 41(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 19280533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of lymphocyte apoptosis in dogs with inflammatory bowel disease.
    Dandrieux JR; Bornand VF; Doherr MG; Kano R; Zurbriggen A; Burgener IA
    Am J Vet Res; 2008 Oct; 69(10):1279-85. PubMed ID: 18828683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A prospective comparison of performance of biopsy forceps used in single passage with multiple bites during upper endoscopy.
    Chu KM; Yuen ST; Wong WM; Wong KW; Lai KC; Hu WH; Leung SY; Yuen MF; Lam SK; Wong BC
    Endoscopy; 2003 Apr; 35(4):338-42. PubMed ID: 12664392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of endoscopic and full-thickness biopsy specimens for diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease and alimentary tract lymphoma in cats.
    Evans SE; Bonczynski JJ; Broussard JD; Han E; Baer KE
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2006 Nov; 229(9):1447-50. PubMed ID: 17078807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reusable biopsy forceps: a prospective evaluation of cleaning, function, adequacy of tissue specimen, and durability.
    Kozarek RA; Attia FM; Sumida SE; Raltz SL; Roach SK; Schembre DB; Brandabur JJ; Ball TJ; Gluck M; Jiranek GC; Patterson DJ; Bredfeldt JE; Gelfand M; McCormick SE; Drajpuch DB; Moran DK
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2001 Jun; 53(7):747-50. PubMed ID: 11375582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of forceps size and mode of orientation on endoscopic small bowel biopsy evaluation.
    Ladas SD; Tsamouri M; Kouvidou C; Raptis SA
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1994; 40(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 8163135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.