These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18155612)

  • 1. Optimising experimental design for MEG beamformer imaging.
    Brookes MJ; Vrba J; Robinson SE; Stevenson CM; Peters AM; Barnes GR; Hillebrand A; Morris PG
    Neuroimage; 2008 Feb; 39(4):1788-802. PubMed ID: 18155612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modified covariance beamformer for solving MEG inverse problem in the environment with correlated sources.
    Kuznetsova A; Nurislamova Y; Ossadtchi A
    Neuroimage; 2021 Mar; 228():117677. PubMed ID: 33385549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Signal space separation beamformer.
    Vrba J; Taulu S; Nenonen J; Ahonen A
    Brain Topogr; 2010 Jun; 23(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 19943101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Source-space ICA for MEG source imaging.
    Jonmohamadi Y; Jones RD
    J Neural Eng; 2016 Feb; 13(1):016005. PubMed ID: 26644284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatio-temporal Reconstruction of Neural Sources Using Indirect Dominant Mode Rejection.
    Jafadideh AT; Asl BM
    Brain Topogr; 2018 Jul; 31(4):591-607. PubMed ID: 29704076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Localization accuracy of a common beamformer for the comparison of two conditions.
    Lucena Gómez G; Peigneux P; Wens V; Bourguignon M
    Neuroimage; 2021 Apr; 230():117793. PubMed ID: 33497769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of anatomical constraints with MEG beamformers.
    Hillebrand A; Barnes GR
    Neuroimage; 2003 Dec; 20(4):2302-13. PubMed ID: 14683731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigating spatial specificity and data averaging in MEG.
    Brookes MJ; Zumer JM; Stevenson CM; Hale JR; Barnes GR; Vrba J; Morris PG
    Neuroimage; 2010 Jan; 49(1):525-38. PubMed ID: 19635575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automated model selection in covariance estimation and spatial whitening of MEG and EEG signals.
    Engemann DA; Gramfort A
    Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():328-42. PubMed ID: 25541187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of beamformer implementations for MEG source localization.
    Jaiswal A; Nenonen J; Stenroos M; Gramfort A; Dalal SS; Westner BU; Litvak V; Mosher JC; Schoffelen JM; Witton C; Oostenveld R; Parkkonen L
    Neuroimage; 2020 Aug; 216():116797. PubMed ID: 32278091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electromagnetic Brain Source Imaging by Means of a Robust Minimum Variance Beamformer.
    Hossein Hosseini SA; Sohrabpour A; Akcakaya M; He B
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2018 Oct; 65(10):2365-2374. PubMed ID: 30047869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensitivity of beamformer source analysis to deficiencies in forward modeling.
    Steinsträter O; Sillekens S; Junghoefer M; Burger M; Wolters CH
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2010 Dec; 31(12):1907-27. PubMed ID: 21086549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance analysis of reduced-rank beamformers for estimating dipole source signals using EEG/MEG.
    Gutiérrez D; Nehorai A; Dogandzić A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 May; 53(5):840-4. PubMed ID: 16686406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MEG source imaging method using fast L1 minimum-norm and its applications to signals with brain noise and human resting-state source amplitude images.
    Huang MX; Huang CW; Robb A; Angeles A; Nichols SL; Baker DG; Song T; Harrington DL; Theilmann RJ; Srinivasan R; Heister D; Diwakar M; Canive JM; Edgar JC; Chen YH; Ji Z; Shen M; El-Gabalawy F; Levy M; McLay R; Webb-Murphy J; Liu TT; Drake A; Lee RR
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jan; 84():585-604. PubMed ID: 24055704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Non-Gaussian probabilistic MEG source localisation based on kernel density estimation.
    Mohseni HR; Kringelbach ML; Woolrich MW; Baker A; Aziz TZ; Probert-Smith P
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 87():444-64. PubMed ID: 24055702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Source localization with MEG data: A beamforming approach based on covariance thresholding.
    Zhang J; Liu C; Green G
    Biometrics; 2014 Mar; 70(1):121-31. PubMed ID: 24350784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy.
    Liu AK; Dale AM; Belliveau JW
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 May; 16(1):47-62. PubMed ID: 11870926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of multi-source minimum variance beamformers for reconstruction of correlated neural activity.
    Moiseev A; Gaspar JM; Schneider JA; Herdman AT
    Neuroimage; 2011 Sep; 58(2):481-96. PubMed ID: 21704172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance of an MEG adaptive-beamformer technique in the presence of correlated neural activities: effects on signal intensity and time-course estimates.
    Sekihara K; Nagarajan SS; Poeppel D; Marantz A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Dec; 49(12 Pt 2):1534-46. PubMed ID: 12549735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of MEG source reconstruction method on source-space connectivity estimation: A comparison between minimum-norm solution and beamforming.
    Hincapié AS; Kujala J; Mattout J; Pascarella A; Daligault S; Delpuech C; Mery D; Cosmelli D; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():29-42. PubMed ID: 28479475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.