These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18155866)

  • 1. Comparison of FDG-PET, PET/CT and MRI for follow-up of colorectal liver metastases treated with radiofrequency ablation: initial results.
    Kuehl H; Antoch G; Stergar H; Veit-Haibach P; Rosenbaum-Krumme S; Vogt F; Frilling A; Barkhausen J; Bockisch A
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Aug; 67(2):362-371. PubMed ID: 18155866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Early PET/CT after radiofrequency ablation in colorectal cancer liver metastases: is it useful?
    Liu ZY; Chang ZH; Lu ZM; Guo QY
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2010 Jul; 123(13):1690-4. PubMed ID: 20819630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The diagnostic performance of
    Samim M; Molenaar IQ; Seesing MFJ; van Rossum PSN; van den Bosch MAAJ; Ruers TJM; Borel Rinkes IHM; van Hillegersberg R; Lam MGEH; Verkooijen HM
    Surg Oncol; 2017 Mar; 26(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 28317583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of PET-MRI in the follow-up after radiofrequency- and microwave ablation of colorectal liver metastases.
    Nielsen K; Scheffer HJ; Pieters IC; van Tilborg AA; van Waesberghe JH; Oprea-Lager DE; Meijerink MR; Kazemier G; Hoekstra OS; Schreurs HW; Sietses C; Meijer S; Comans EF; van den Tol PM
    BMC Med Imaging; 2014 Aug; 14():27. PubMed ID: 25103913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection of residual tumor after radiofrequency ablation of liver metastasis with dual-modality PET/CT: initial results.
    Veit P; Antoch G; Stergar H; Bockisch A; Forsting M; Kuehl H
    Eur Radiol; 2006 Jan; 16(1):80-7. PubMed ID: 15868122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. FDG positron emission tomography in the surveillance of hepatic tumors treated with radiofrequency ablation.
    Anderson GS; Brinkmann F; Soulen MC; Alavi A; Zhuang H
    Clin Nucl Med; 2003 Mar; 28(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 12592125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Where there is no PET/CT.
    Kuehl H; Antoch G; Bockisch A; Forsting M
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Aug; 67(2):372. PubMed ID: 18387765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. CT versus MR guidance for radiofrequency ablation in patients with colorectal liver metastases: a 10-year follow-up favors MR guidance.
    Pereira PL; Siemou P; Rempp HJ; Hoffmann R; Hoffmann RT; Kettenbach J; Clasen S; Helmberger T
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Jul; 34(7):4663-4671. PubMed ID: 38041717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic accuracy of CE-CT, MRI and FDG PET/CT for detecting colorectal cancer liver metastases in patients considered eligible for hepatic resection and/or local ablation.
    Sivesgaard K; Larsen LP; Sørensen M; Kramer S; Schlander S; Amanavicius N; Bharadwaz A; Tønner Nielsen D; Viborg Mortensen F; Morre Pedersen E
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Nov; 28(11):4735-4747. PubMed ID: 29736846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Where there is no PET/CT.
    Ahmad MN; Zafar AM; Nadeem N
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jun; 70(3):463-4. PubMed ID: 18387762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mid-term outcome of positron emission tomography/computed tomography-assisted radiofrequency ablation in primary and secondary liver tumours--a single-centre experience.
    Kuehl H; Stattaus J; Hertel S; Hunold P; Kaiser G; Bockisch A; Forsting M
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2008 Apr; 20(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 18155453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of whole-body imaging on treatment decision to radio-frequency ablation in patients with malignant liver tumors: comparison of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/computed tomography, PET and computed tomography.
    Kuehl H; Rosenbaum-Krumme S; Veit-Haibach P; Stergar H; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G
    Nucl Med Commun; 2008 Jul; 29(7):599-606. PubMed ID: 18528181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Morphologic and functional changes in nontumorous liver tissue after radiofrequency ablation in an in vivo model: comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT, MRI, ultrasound, and CT.
    Vogt FM; Antoch G; Veit P; Freudenberg LS; Blechschmid N; Diersch O; Bockisch A; Barkhausen J; Kuehl H
    J Nucl Med; 2007 Nov; 48(11):1836-44. PubMed ID: 17942811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography surveillance of hepatic metastases from prostate cancer following radiofrequency ablation: a case report.
    Ludwig V; Hopper OW; Martin WH; Kikkawa R; Delbeke D
    Am Surg; 2003 Jul; 69(7):593-8. PubMed ID: 12889623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [F-18] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography as a tool for early recognition of incomplete tumor destruction after radiofrequency ablation for liver metastases.
    Donckier V; Van Laethem JL; Goldman S; Van Gansbeke D; Feron P; Ickx B; Wikler D; Gelin M
    J Surg Oncol; 2003 Dec; 84(4):215-23. PubMed ID: 14756432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictive value of pattern classification 24 hours after radiofrequency ablation of liver metastases on CT and positron emission tomography/CT.
    Vandenbroucke F; Vandemeulebroucke J; Ilsen B; Verdries D; Belsack D; Everaert H; Buls N; Ros PR; de Mey J
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2014 Aug; 25(8):1240-9. PubMed ID: 24954606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contrast-enhanced FDG-PET/CT vs. SPIO-enhanced MRI vs. FDG-PET vs. CT in patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a prospective study with intraoperative confirmation.
    Rappeport ED; Loft A; Berthelsen AK; von der Recke P; Larsen PN; Mogensen AM; Wettergren A; Rasmussen A; Hillingsoe J; Kirkegaard P; Thomsen C
    Acta Radiol; 2007 May; 48(4):369-78. PubMed ID: 17453514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. PET-CT after radiofrequency ablation of colorectal liver metastases: suggestions for timing and image interpretation.
    Nielsen K; van Tilborg AA; Scheffer HJ; Meijerink MR; de Lange-de Klerk ES; Meijer S; Comans EF; van den Tol MP
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):2169-75. PubMed ID: 24021269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of colo-rectal liver metastases: prospective comparison of contrast enhanced US, multidetector CT, PET/CT, and 1.5 Tesla MR with extracellular and reticulo-endothelial cell specific contrast agents.
    Mainenti PP; Mancini M; Mainolfi C; Camera L; Maurea S; Manchia A; Tanga M; Persico F; Addeo P; D'Antonio D; Speranza A; Bucci L; Persico G; Pace L; Salvatore M
    Abdom Imaging; 2010 Oct; 35(5):511-21. PubMed ID: 19562412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Economic evaluation of 18F-FDG PET/CT, MRI and CE-CT in selection of colorectal liver metastases eligible for ablation - A cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Schnitzer ML; Buchner J; Biechele G; Grawe F; Ingenerf M; von Münchhausen N; Kaiser CG; Kunz WG; Froelich MF; Schmid-Tannwald C; Rübenthaler J
    Eur J Radiol; 2023 Jun; 163():110803. PubMed ID: 37004464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.