156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18156324)
1. Genomic differences between Fibrobacter succinogenes S85 and Fibrobacter intestinalis DR7, identified by suppression subtractive hybridization.
Qi M; Nelson KE; Daugherty SC; Nelson WC; Hance IR; Morrison M; Forsberg CW
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2008 Feb; 74(4):987-93. PubMed ID: 18156324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Novel molecular features of the fibrolytic intestinal bacterium Fibrobacter intestinalis not shared with Fibrobacter succinogenes as determined by suppressive subtractive hybridization.
Qi M; Nelson KE; Daugherty SC; Nelson WC; Hance IR; Morrison M; Forsberg CW
J Bacteriol; 2005 Jun; 187(11):3739-51. PubMed ID: 15901698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development of a RT-qPCR method for the quantification of Fibrobacter succinogenes S85 glycoside hydrolase transcripts in the rumen content of gnotobiotic and conventional sheep.
Béra-Maillet C; Mosoni P; Kwasiborski A; Suau F; Ribot Y; Forano E
J Microbiol Methods; 2009 Apr; 77(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 19318052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The complete genome sequence of Fibrobacter succinogenes S85 reveals a cellulolytic and metabolic specialist.
Suen G; Weimer PJ; Stevenson DM; Aylward FO; Boyum J; Deneke J; Drinkwater C; Ivanova NN; Mikhailova N; Chertkov O; Goodwin LA; Currie CR; Mead D; Brumm PJ
PLoS One; 2011 Apr; 6(4):e18814. PubMed ID: 21526192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fiber-degrading systems of different strains of the genus Fibrobacter.
Béra-Maillet C; Ribot Y; Forano E
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2004 Apr; 70(4):2172-9. PubMed ID: 15066810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of novel Fibrobacter populations in landfill sites and determination of their relative abundance via quantitative PCR.
McDonald JE; Lockhart RJ; Cox MJ; Allison HE; McCarthy AJ
Environ Microbiol; 2008 May; 10(5):1310-9. PubMed ID: 18266756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Functional annotation of Fibrobacter succinogenes S85 carbohydrate active enzymes.
Brumm P; Mead D; Boyum J; Drinkwater C; Deneke J; Gowda K; Stevenson D; Weimer P
Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2011 Mar; 163(5):649-57. PubMed ID: 20803100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monitoring of gene expression in Fibrobacter succinogenes S85 under the co-culture with non-fibrolytic ruminal bacteria.
Fukuma NM; Koike S; Kobayashi Y
Arch Microbiol; 2015 Mar; 197(2):269-76. PubMed ID: 25354721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of suppressive subtractive hybridization to identify Flavobacterium columnare DNA sequences not shared with Flavobacterium johnsoniae.
Olivares-Fuster O; Arias CR
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2008 Jun; 46(6):605-12. PubMed ID: 18444979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection and identification of rumen bacteria constituting a fibrolytic consortium dominated by Fibrobacter succinogenes.
Shinkai T; Ueki T; Kobayashi Y
Anim Sci J; 2010 Feb; 81(1):72-9. PubMed ID: 20163675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ionized calcium requirement of rumen cellulolytic bacteria.
Morales MS; Dehority BA
J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5079-91. PubMed ID: 19762826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12.
Fakih I; Got J; Robles-Rodriguez CE; Siegel A; Forano E; Muñoz-Tamayo R
mSystems; 2023 Jun; 8(3):e0102722. PubMed ID: 37289026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Phylogenomic Diversity of Herbivore-Associated
Neumann AP; Suen G
mSphere; 2018 Dec; 3(6):. PubMed ID: 30541780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Involvement of recently cultured group U2 bacterium in ruminal fiber digestion revealed by coculture with Fibrobacter succinogenes S85.
Fukuma N; Koike S; Kobayashi Y
FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2012 Nov; 336(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 22849722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Semi-quantitative analysis of Ruminococcus flavefaciens, Fibrobacter succinogenes and Streptococcus bovis in the equine large intestine using real-time polymerase chain reaction.
Hastie PM; Mitchell K; Murray JA
Br J Nutr; 2008 Sep; 100(3):561-8. PubMed ID: 18377691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Localization of ruminal cellulolytic bacteria on plant fibrous materials as determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization and real-time PCR.
Shinkai T; Kobayashi Y
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2007 Mar; 73(5):1646-52. PubMed ID: 17209077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Generation and Characterization of Acid Tolerant Fibrobacter succinogenes S85.
Wu CW; Spike T; Klingeman DM; Rodriguez M; Bremer VR; Brown SD
Sci Rep; 2017 May; 7(1):2277. PubMed ID: 28536480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outer membrane proteins of Fibrobacter succinogenes with potential roles in adhesion to cellulose and in cellulose digestion.
Jun HS; Qi M; Gong J; Egbosimba EE; Forsberg CW
J Bacteriol; 2007 Oct; 189(19):6806-15. PubMed ID: 17644604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characterization of a family 45 glycosyl hydrolase from Fibrobacter succinogenes S85.
Seon Park J; Russell JB; Wilson DB
Anaerobe; 2007 Apr; 13(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 17292641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diauxic growth of Fibrobacter succinogenes S85 on cellobiose and lactose.
Ghali I; Sofyan A; Ohmori H; Shinkai T; Mitsumori M
FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2017 Aug; 364(15):. PubMed ID: 28859317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
