These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18156512)

  • 1. Debating disability.
    Shakespeare T
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Jan; 34(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 18156512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impairment/disability distinction: a response to Shakespeare.
    Edwards SD
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Jan; 34(1):26-7. PubMed ID: 18156517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Philosophy and science: the axes of evil in disability studies?
    Vehmas S
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Jan; 34(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 18156515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Disability: getting it "right".
    Thomas C
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Jan; 34(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 18156513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is Tom Shakespeare disabled?
    Koch T
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Jan; 34(1):18-20. PubMed ID: 18156514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The expressivist objection to prenatal diagnosis: can it be laid to rest?
    Holm S
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Jan; 34(1):24-5. PubMed ID: 18156516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Redefining disability: maleficent, unjust and inconsistent.
    Cox-White B; Boxall SF
    J Med Philos; 2008 Dec; 33(6):558-76. PubMed ID: 19074236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Administration about-face on disability could be a political blessing in disguise.
    Demkovich LE
    Natl J (Wash); 1984 Apr; 16(17):823-5. PubMed ID: 10317445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Disability, identity and the "expressivist objection".
    Edwards SD
    J Med Ethics; 2004 Aug; 30(4):418-20. PubMed ID: 15289542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Introduction to this issue: disability, public policy, and technology.
    Schartz HA; O'Day B; Blanck P
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 12579614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 'You are inferior!' Revisiting the expressivist argument.
    Hofmann B
    Bioethics; 2017 Sep; 31(7):505-514. PubMed ID: 28614604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical (mis)judgments of quality of life after disability.
    Kothari S
    J Clin Ethics; 2004; 15(4):300-7. PubMed ID: 15830558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Definition, classification and epidemiology of disability].
    Ravaud JF
    Rev Prat; 2009 Oct; 59(8):1067-74. PubMed ID: 19894442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The fuzzy buzz word: conceptualisations of disability in disability research classics.
    Grönvik L
    Sociol Health Illn; 2007 Jul; 29(5):750-66. PubMed ID: 17714341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Realising the rights of disabled people in Africa: an introduction to the special issue.
    Mji G; Maclachlan M; Melling-Williams N; Gcaza S
    Disabil Rehabil; 2009; 31(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 19194806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. It's a wonderful life: is it possible to say that a severely disabled child has been harmed by the mere fact of being born?
    Perry R
    Cornell Law Rev; 2007 Nov; 93(2):329-400. PubMed ID: 18354869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mandatory reassignment under the ADA: the circuit split and need for a socio-political understanding of disability.
    Dorsey NA
    Cornell Law Rev; 2009 Jan; 94(2):443-78. PubMed ID: 19288614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Disabled Peoples' International: declaration of rights.
    Nurs Ethics; 2001 Mar; 8(2):159-60. PubMed ID: 16010891
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The evolving understanding of the construct of intellectual disability.
    Schalock RL
    J Intellect Dev Disabil; 2011 Dec; 36(4):223-33. PubMed ID: 22029886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. AAPL Practice Guideline for the Forensic Evaluation of Psychiatric Disability.
    Gold LH; Anfang SA; Drukteinis AM; Metzner JL; Price M; Wall BW; Wylonis L; Zonana HV
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(4 Suppl):S3-S50. PubMed ID: 19092058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.