These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18157231)

  • 1. The copula: a tool for simulating speckle dynamics.
    Duncan DD; Kirkpatrick SJ
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2008 Jan; 25(1):231-7. PubMed ID: 18157231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detrimental effects of speckle-pixel size matching in laser speckle contrast imaging.
    Kirkpatrick SJ; Duncan DD; Wells-Gray EM
    Opt Lett; 2008 Dec; 33(24):2886-8. PubMed ID: 19079481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficient processing of laser speckle contrast images.
    Tom WJ; Ponticorvo A; Dunn AK
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Dec; 27(12):1728-38. PubMed ID: 19033089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optical vortex behavior in dynamic speckle fields.
    Kirkpatrick SJ; Khaksari K; Thomas D; Duncan DD
    J Biomed Opt; 2012 May; 17(5):050504. PubMed ID: 22612119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of motion tracking in echocardiographic image sequences: influence of system geometry and point-spread function.
    Touil B; Basarab A; Delachartre P; Bernard O; Friboulet D
    Ultrasonics; 2010 Mar; 50(3):373-86. PubMed ID: 19837445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of optical flow algorithms to laser speckle imaging.
    Aminfar A; Davoodzadeh N; Aguilar G; Princevac M
    Microvasc Res; 2019 Mar; 122():52-59. PubMed ID: 30414869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Markov speckle for efficient random bit generation.
    Horstmeyer R; Chen RY; Judkewitz B; Yang C
    Opt Express; 2012 Nov; 20(24):26394-410. PubMed ID: 23187494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative modeling of laser speckle imaging.
    Zakharov P; Völker A; Buck A; Weber B; Scheffold F
    Opt Lett; 2006 Dec; 31(23):3465-7. PubMed ID: 17099751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of static scatterers in laser speckle contrast imaging: an experimental study on correlation and contrast.
    Vaz PG; Humeau-Heurtier A; Figueiras E; Correia C; Cardoso J
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Dec; 63(1):015024. PubMed ID: 29205168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of multifractal analysis in dynamic laser speckle signals using a spatial light modulator.
    Alvarez N; Vadnjal AL; Etchepareborda P; Bianchetti A; Federico A
    Appl Opt; 2019 Feb; 58(6):1587-1595. PubMed ID: 30874049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dynamic laser speckle imaging of cerebral blood flow.
    Zakharov P; Völker AC; Wyss MT; Haiss F; Calcinaghi N; Zunzunegui C; Buck A; Scheffold F; Weber B
    Opt Express; 2009 Aug; 17(16):13904-17. PubMed ID: 19654798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative temporal speckle contrast imaging for tissue mechanics.
    Kirkpatrick SJ; Duncan DD; Wang RK; Hinds MT
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2007 Dec; 24(12):3728-34. PubMed ID: 18059925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Island analysis of low-activity dynamic speckles.
    Guzmán MN; Hernán Sendra G; Rabal HJ; Trivi M
    Appl Opt; 2014 Jan; 53(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 24513983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Human speckle perception threshold for still images from a laser projection system.
    Roelandt S; Meuret Y; Jacobs A; Willaert K; Janssens P; Thienpont H; Verschaffelt G
    Opt Express; 2014 Oct; 22(20):23965-79. PubMed ID: 25321973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of velocity distribution assumption on simplified laser speckle imaging equation.
    Ramirez-San-Juan JC; Ramos-García R; Guizar-Iturbide I; Martínez-Niconoff G; Choi B
    Opt Express; 2008 Mar; 16(5):3197-203. PubMed ID: 18542407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speckle suppression in scanning laser display.
    Yurlov V; Lapchuk A; Yun S; Song J; Yang H
    Appl Opt; 2008 Jan; 47(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 18188199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic laser speckle analyzed considering inhomogeneities in the biological sample.
    Braga RA; González-Peña RJ; Viana DC; Rivera FP
    J Biomed Opt; 2017 Apr; 22(4):45010. PubMed ID: 28444121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistics of local speckle contrast.
    Duncan DD; Kirkpatrick SJ; Wang RK
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2008 Jan; 25(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 18157206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nonlocal Total-Variation-Based Speckle Filtering for Ultrasound Images.
    Wen T; Gu J; Li L; Qin W; Wang L; Xie Y
    Ultrason Imaging; 2016 Jul; 38(4):254-75. PubMed ID: 26316172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simulating the human eye in measurements of speckle from laser-based projection displays.
    Kubota S
    Appl Opt; 2014 Jun; 53(17):3814-20. PubMed ID: 24921149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.