These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18157280)

  • 1. Improving the performance of a pyramid wavefront sensor with modal sensitivity compensation.
    Korkiakoski V; Vérinaud C; Le Louarn M
    Appl Opt; 2008 Jan; 47(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 18157280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modulation-nonmodulation pyramid wavefront sensor with direct gradient reconstruction algorithm on the closed-loop adaptive optics system.
    Wang S; Wei K; Zheng W
    Opt Express; 2018 Aug; 26(16):20952-20964. PubMed ID: 30119402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preprocessed cumulative reconstructor with domain decomposition: a fast wavefront reconstruction method for pyramid wavefront sensor.
    Shatokhina I; Obereder A; Rosensteiner M; Ramlau R
    Appl Opt; 2013 Apr; 52(12):2640-52. PubMed ID: 23669672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Time delay compensation method for tip-tilt control in adaptive optics system.
    Wang C; Hu L; Wang Y; Wang S; Mu Q; Li D; Cao Z; Yang C; Xu H; Xuan L
    Appl Opt; 2015 Apr; 54(11):3383-8. PubMed ID: 25967327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nonlinear wavefront reconstruction with convolutional neural networks for Fourier-based wavefront sensors.
    Landman R; Haffert SY
    Opt Express; 2020 May; 28(11):16644-16657. PubMed ID: 32549483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficient, nonlinear phase estimation with the nonmodulated pyramid wavefront sensor.
    Frazin RA
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2018 Apr; 35(4):594-607. PubMed ID: 29603948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between a model-based and a conventional pyramid sensor reconstructor.
    Korkiakoski V; Vérinaud C; Le Louarn M; Conan R
    Appl Opt; 2007 Aug; 46(24):6176-84. PubMed ID: 17712383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laboratory demonstrations on a pyramid wavefront sensor without modulation for closed-loop adaptive optics system.
    Wang S; Rao C; Xian H; Zhang J; Wang J; Liu Z
    Opt Express; 2011 Apr; 19(9):8135-50. PubMed ID: 21643064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Convolution- and Fourier-transform-based reconstructors for pyramid wavefront sensor.
    Shatokhina I; Ramlau R
    Appl Opt; 2017 Aug; 56(22):6381-6390. PubMed ID: 29047838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimization of the holographic wavefront sensor for open-loop adaptive optics under realistic turbulence. Part I: simulations.
    Zepp A; Gladysz S; Stein K; Osten W
    Appl Opt; 2021 Aug; 60(22):F88-F98. PubMed ID: 34612865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adaptive-optics correction of a stellar interferometer with a single pyramid wave-front sensor.
    Verinaud C; Esposito S
    Opt Lett; 2002 Apr; 27(7):470-2. PubMed ID: 18007834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Signal spatial filtering for co-phasing in seeing-limited conditions.
    Pinna E; Quirós-Pacheco F; Esposito S; Puglisi A; Stefanini P
    Opt Lett; 2007 Dec; 32(23):3465-7. PubMed ID: 18059968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adaptive optics for ophthalmic applications using a pyramid wavefront sensor.
    Chamot SR; Dainty C; Esposito S
    Opt Express; 2006 Jan; 14(2):518-26. PubMed ID: 19503366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Generalized Fried parameter after adaptive optics partial wave-front compensation.
    Cagigal MP; Canales VF
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2000 May; 17(5):903-10. PubMed ID: 10795639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital pyramid wavefront sensor with tunable modulation.
    Akondi V; Castillo S; Vohnsen B
    Opt Express; 2013 Jul; 21(15):18261-72. PubMed ID: 23938697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laboratory demonstration of accurate and efficient nanometer-level wavefront control for extreme adaptive optics.
    Poyneer LA; Dillon D; Thomas S; Macintosh BA
    Appl Opt; 2008 Mar; 47(9):1317-26. PubMed ID: 18709080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nonlinear wavefront reconstruction methods for pyramid sensors using Landweber and Landweber-Kaczmarz iterations.
    Hutterer V; Ramlau R
    Appl Opt; 2018 Oct; 57(30):8790-8804. PubMed ID: 30461858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correction of non-common path aberrations in pyramid wavefront sensors to recover the optimal magnitude gain using a deformable lens.
    Quintavalla M; Bergomi M; Magrin D; Bonora S; Ragazzoni R
    Appl Opt; 2020 Jun; 59(17):5151-5157. PubMed ID: 32543534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Compensated-beacon adaptive optics using least-squares phase reconstruction.
    Banet MT; Spencer MF
    Opt Express; 2020 Nov; 28(24):36902-36914. PubMed ID: 33379774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Virtual pyramid wavefront sensor for phase unwrapping.
    Akondi V; Vohnsen B; Marcos S
    Appl Opt; 2016 Oct; 55(29):8363-8367. PubMed ID: 27828088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.