These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18157626)

  • 1. Through evolution's eyes: extracting mate preferences by linking visual attention to adaptive design.
    Krupp DB
    Arch Sex Behav; 2008 Feb; 37(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 18157626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mate choice decisions: the role of facial beauty.
    Johnston VS
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2006 Jan; 10(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 16311066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variable female preferences drive complex male displays.
    Coleman SW; Patricelli GL; Borgia G
    Nature; 2004 Apr; 428(6984):742-5. PubMed ID: 15085130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Female condition influences preferences for sexual dimorphism in faces of male humans (Homo sapiens).
    Penton-Voak IS; Little AC; Jones BC; Burt DM; Tiddeman BP; Perrett DI
    J Comp Psychol; 2003 Sep; 117(3):264-71. PubMed ID: 14498802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Public versus personal information for mate copying in an invertebrate.
    Mery F; Varela SA; Danchin E; Blanchet S; Parejo D; Coolen I; Wagner RH
    Curr Biol; 2009 May; 19(9):730-4. PubMed ID: 19361993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using revealed mate preferences to evaluate market force and differential preference explanations for mate selection.
    Wood D; Brumbaugh CC
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jun; 96(6):1226-44. PubMed ID: 19469598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How humans cognitively manage an abundance of mate options.
    Lenton AP; Francesconi M
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Apr; 21(4):528-33. PubMed ID: 20424095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evolution of human mate choice.
    Geary DC; Vigil J; Byrd-Craven J
    J Sex Res; 2004 Feb; 41(1):27-42. PubMed ID: 15216422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural bases of human mate choice: multiple value dimensions, sex difference, and self-assessment system.
    Funayama R; Sugiura M; Sassa Y; Jeong H; Wakusawa K; Horie K; Sato S; Kawashima R
    Soc Neurosci; 2012; 7(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 21936741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adaptive mating strategies and the problem of mate retention.
    Husárová B
    Anthropol Anz; 2005 Sep; 63(3):283-7. PubMed ID: 16176054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reconciling sexual selection to species recognition: a process-based model of mating decision.
    Castellano S; Cermelli P
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Oct; 242(3):529-38. PubMed ID: 16712871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Social perception of facial resemblance in humans.
    DeBruine LM; Jones BC; Little AC; Perrett DI
    Arch Sex Behav; 2008 Feb; 37(1):64-77. PubMed ID: 18157627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ageing, mate preferences and sexuality: a mini-review.
    Oberzaucher E; Grammer K
    Gerontology; 2009; 55(4):371-8. PubMed ID: 19229111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of menstrual cycle phase on face preferences.
    Jones BC; DeBruine LM; Perrett DI; Little AC; Feinberg DR; Law Smith MJ
    Arch Sex Behav; 2008 Feb; 37(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 18193349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: testing the tradeoffs.
    Li NP; Bailey JM; Kenrick DT; Linsenmeier JA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Jun; 82(6):947-55. PubMed ID: 12051582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlations between heterozygosity and measures of genetic similarity: implications for understanding mate choice.
    Roberts SC; Hale ML; Petrie M
    J Evol Biol; 2006 Mar; 19(2):558-69. PubMed ID: 16599932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sex differences in adults' relative visual interest in female and male faces, toys, and play styles.
    Alexander GM; Charles N
    Arch Sex Behav; 2009 Jun; 38(3):434-41. PubMed ID: 19016319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of a parenting prime on sex differences in mate selection criteria.
    Millar MG; Ostlund NM
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Nov; 32(11):1459-68. PubMed ID: 17030888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A cognitive framework for mate choice and species recognition.
    Phelps SM; Rand AS; Ryan MJ
    Am Nat; 2006 Jan; 167(1):28-42. PubMed ID: 16475097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner?
    Eastwick PW; Finkel EJ
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Feb; 94(2):245-64. PubMed ID: 18211175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.