These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1815774)

  • 41. St Jude Epic heart valve bioprostheses versus native human and porcine aortic valves - comparison of mechanical properties.
    Kalejs M; Stradins P; Lacis R; Ozolanta I; Pavars J; Kasyanov V
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 May; 8(5):553-6. PubMed ID: 19190025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Hemodynamic comparison of Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards mitral bioprosthetic valves.
    Khan S; Mitchell RS; Derby GC; Oyer PE; Miller DC
    Circulation; 1990 Nov; 82(5 Suppl):IV75-81. PubMed ID: 2225438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Asynchronous closure and leaflet impact velocity of bileaflet mechanical heart valves.
    Wu ZJ; Hwang NH
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1995 Jul; 4 Suppl 1():S38-49. PubMed ID: 8581210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Analysis of the design and dynamics of aortic bioprostheses in vivo.
    Thubrikar M; Skinner JR; Aouad J; Finkelmeier BA; Nolan SP
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1982 Aug; 84(2):282-90. PubMed ID: 7098513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Papillary muscle force distribution after total tricuspid reconstruction using porcine extracellular matrix: in-vitro valve characterization.
    Ropcke DM; Jensen MO; Jensen H; Hejslet T; Nielsen SL
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 Nov; 23(6):788-94. PubMed ID: 25790629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Fixation and mounting of porcine aortic valves for use in mock circuits.
    Schlöglhofer T; Aigner P; Stoiber M; Schima H
    Int J Artif Organs; 2013 Oct; 36(10):738-41. PubMed ID: 23918266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Hemodynamic comparison of Medtronic intact bioprostheses and bileaflet mechanical prostheses in aortic position.
    Ricou F; Brun A; Lerch R
    Cardiology; 1996; 87(3):212-5. PubMed ID: 8725316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Hydrodynamic Assessment of Aortic Valves Prepared from Porcine Small Intestinal Submucosa.
    Ramaswamy S; Lordeus M; Mankame OV; Valdes-Cruz L; Bibevski S; Bell SM; Baez I; Scholl F
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2017 Mar; 8(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 27995570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Biomechanics of glutaraldehyde-treated porcine aortic roots and valves. An investigation of the effect of predilation of the elastic aortic root.
    Lockie KJ; Fisher J; Juster NP; Davies GA; Watterson K
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1994 Dec; 108(6):1037-42. PubMed ID: 7983873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Mid- to long-term outcome comparison of the Medtronic Hancock II and bi-leaflet mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Wang Y; Chen S; Shi J; Li G; Dong N
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 22(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 26675564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Trans-catheter valve-in-valve implantation: in vitro hydrodynamic performance of the SAPIEN+cloth trans-catheter heart valve in the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount valves.
    Walther T; Dehdashtian MM; Khanna R; Young E; Goldbrunner PJ; Lee W
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Nov; 40(5):1120-6. PubMed ID: 21466959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. In vitro fluid dynamic characteristics of Ionescu-Shiley and Carpentier-Edwards tissue bioprostheses.
    Yoganathan AP; Woo YR; Williams FP; Stevenson DM; Franch RH; Harrison EC
    Artif Organs; 1983 Nov; 7(4):459-69. PubMed ID: 6651586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Commissural dehiscence: a rare and peculiar cause of porcine valve structural deterioration.
    Bottio T; Valente M; Rizzoli G; Tarzia V; Bisleri G; Pettenazzo E; Gerosa G; Thiene G
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Nov; 132(5):1017-22. PubMed ID: 17059917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A new design for polyurethane heart valves.
    Butterfield M; Wheatley DJ; Williams DF; Fisher J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Jan; 10(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 11206756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Steady flow dynamics of prosthetic aortic heart valves: a comparative evaluation with PIV techniques.
    Lim WL; Chew YT; Chew TC; Low HT
    J Biomech; 1998 May; 31(5):411-21. PubMed ID: 9727338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Non-invasive assessment by Doppler ultrasound of 155 patients with bioprosthetic valves: a comparison of the Wessex porcine, low profile Ionescu-Shiley, and Hancock pericardial bioprostheses.
    Simpson IA; Reece IJ; Houston AB; Hutton I; Wheatley DJ; Cobbe SM
    Br Heart J; 1986 Jul; 56(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 3524634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effect of glutaraldehyde fixation and valve constraint conditions on porcine aortic valve leaflet coaptation.
    Broom ND; Marra D
    Thorax; 1982 Aug; 37(8):620-6. PubMed ID: 6817442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Hemodynamic evaluation of Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards bioprostheses.
    Levine FH; Carter JE; Buckley MJ; Daggett WM; Akins CW; Austen WG
    Circulation; 1981 Aug; 64(2 Pt 2):II192-5. PubMed ID: 7249322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Differences in Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards porcine xenograft aortic valve hemodynamics. Effect of valve size.
    Khan SS; Mitchell RS; Derby GC; Oyer PE; Miller DC
    Circulation; 1990 Nov; 82(5 Suppl):IV117-24. PubMed ID: 2225396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. In vitro evaluation of six mechanical and six bioprosthetic valves.
    Fisher J; Reece IJ; Wheatley DJ
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Jun; 34(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 2426828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.