These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1815793)

  • 1. [Indication and application of the cervical traction headgear].
    Kahl B
    Prakt Kieferorthop; 1991 May; 5(2):105-14. PubMed ID: 1815793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Treatment of severe Class II Division 1 deep overbite malocclusion without extractions in an adult.
    Horiuchi Y; Horiuchi M; Soma K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4 Suppl):S121-9. PubMed ID: 18407019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Activator versus cervical headgear: superimpositional cephalometric comparison.
    Haralabakis NB; Halazonetis DJ; Sifakakis IB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 12637902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of cervical headgear with an expanded inner bow in the permanent dentition.
    Varlik SK; Iscan HN
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Aug; 30(4):425-30. PubMed ID: 18678761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distal movement of the maxillary molar using an active removable appliance and extraoral force: a case report.
    Johnson BE
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Jan; 25(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 8190880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Class II Division 1 malocclusion with severe overbite: cephalometric evaluation of the effects of orthodontic treatment.
    Marques LS; Ramos-Jorge ML; Araujo MT; Bolognese AM
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(4):319-28. PubMed ID: 19146013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retrospective analysis of casts to assess cervical headgear treatment in the presence of vertical growth pattern.
    Godt A; Kalwitzki M; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2005 May; 66(3):230-40. PubMed ID: 15959636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Biomechanic of the asymmetrical headgear].
    Sander FG
    Prakt Kieferorthop; 1990 Nov; 4(4):293-304. PubMed ID: 2135592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Timing of Class II treatment: skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment.
    Dolce C; McGorray SP; Brazeau L; King GJ; Wheeler TT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 17920501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cervical headgear vs pendulum appliance for the treatment of moderate skeletal Class II malocclusion.
    Mossaz CF; Byloff FK; Kiliaridis S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):616-23. PubMed ID: 18005835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of cervical headgear and edgewise appliances on growing patients.
    Schiavon Gandini MR; Gandini LG; Da Rosa Martins JC; Del Santo M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):531-8; discussion 538-9. PubMed ID: 11343026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Unequal outer and inner bow configurations: comparing 2 asymmetric headgear systems.
    Brosh T; Portal S; Sarne O; Vardimon AD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jul; 128(1):68-75; discussion 75-7. PubMed ID: 16027627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Case report: non-extraction treatment with functional and mechanical therapy of a Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Murakami T; Moro N; Abe K
    Aust Orthod J; 1997 Mar; 14(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 9528407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term effects of Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by fixed appliances.
    Westwood PV; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Sarver DM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):306-20. PubMed ID: 12637903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Treatment of Class II, division 1, cases with a maxillary traction splint.
    Seçkin O; Surucu R
    Quintessence Int; 1990 Mar; 21(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 2374804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term maxillary changes in patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion treated with slow and rapid palatal expansion.
    Lima Filho RM; de Oliveira Ruellas AC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Sep; 134(3):383-8. PubMed ID: 18774084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The effects on upper first molars by the face-bow construction. Consideration of utilizing the strain gauge method and the computer method of structural analysis].
    Nakamura R
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Apr; 48(2):246-66. PubMed ID: 2632655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of cervical headgear and fixed appliances on the space available for maxillary second molars.
    Piva LM; Brito HH; Leite HR; O'Reilly M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Sep; 128(3):366-71. PubMed ID: 16168333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.