BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18158177)

  • 1. Impact of the 1976 Tobacco Control Act in Finland on the proportion of ever daily smokers by socioeconomic status.
    Helakorpi S; Martelin T; Torppa J; Vartiainen E; Uutela A; Patja K
    Prev Med; 2008 Apr; 46(4):340-5. PubMed ID: 18158177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Did Finland's Tobacco Control Act of 1976 have an impact on ever smoking? An examination based on male and female cohort trends.
    Helakorpi S; Martelin T; Torppa J; Patja K; Vartiainen E; Uutela A
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2004 Aug; 58(8):649-54. PubMed ID: 15252066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Did the Tobacco Control Act Amendment in 1995 affect daily smoking in Finland? Effects of a restrictive workplace smoking policy.
    Helakorpi SA; Martelin TP; Torppa JO; Patja KM; Kiiskinen UA; Vartiainen EA; Uutela AK
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2008 Dec; 30(4):407-14. PubMed ID: 18003652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of governmental antismoking policy on socioeconomic disparities in cigarette smoking in South Korea.
    Khang YH; Yun SC; Cho HJ; Jung-Choi K
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2009 Mar; 11(3):262-9. PubMed ID: 19251768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gender differences in daily smoking prevalence in different age strata: a population-based study in southern Sweden.
    Ali SM; Chaix B; Merlo J; Rosvall M; Wamala S; Lindström M
    Scand J Public Health; 2009 Mar; 37(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 19141546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Social determinants of ever initiating smoking differ from those of quitting: a cross-sectional study in Estonia.
    Leinsalu M; Tekkel M; Kunst AE
    Eur J Public Health; 2007 Dec; 17(6):572-8. PubMed ID: 17403786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Socioeconomic position and smoking behaviour in Danish adults.
    Osler M; Holstein B; Avlund K; Damsgaard MT; Rasmussen NK
    Scand J Public Health; 2001 Mar; 29(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 11355714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Welcome to Serbia: feel free to smoke.
    O'Rourke M; Djukic J
    Tob Control; 2008 Dec; 17(6):428-30. PubMed ID: 18827037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Korean male smokers' perceptions of tobacco control policies in the United States.
    Kim SS; Nam KA
    Public Health Nurs; 2005; 22(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 15982195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Home smoking bans in Finland and the association with child smoking.
    Rainio SU; Rimpelä AH
    Eur J Public Health; 2008 Jun; 18(3):306-11. PubMed ID: 17925322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Explaining the convergence of male and female smoking prevalence in Australia.
    Morley KI; Hall WD
    Addiction; 2008 Mar; 103(3):487-95. PubMed ID: 18190667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of material and behavioural factors on occupational class differences in health.
    Laaksonen M; Roos E; Rahkonen O; Martikainen P; Lahelma E
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2005 Feb; 59(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 15650150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The 2005 British Columbia Smoking Cessation Mass Media Campaign and short-term changes in smoking.
    Gagné L
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 2007; 13(3):296-306. PubMed ID: 17435497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Study of the impact of laws regulating tobacco consumption on the prevalence of passive smoking in Spain.
    Jiménez-Ruiz CA; Miranda JA; Hurt RD; Pinedo AR; Reina SS; Valero FC
    Eur J Public Health; 2008 Dec; 18(6):622-5. PubMed ID: 18676987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Response to ban on smoking in public places--a cross-sectional study.
    Hussain A; Mohan A; Sathiyasekaran BW
    J Indian Med Assoc; 2009 Jul; 107(7):450, 452. PubMed ID: 20112848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Smoking behavior among French and American women.
    King G; Grizeau D; Bendel R; Dressen C; Delaronde SR
    Prev Med; 1998; 27(4):520-9. PubMed ID: 9672945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trends of socioeconomic differences in daily vegetable consumption, 1979-2002.
    Roos E; Talala K; Laaksonen M; Helakorpi S; Rahkonen O; Uutela A; Prättälä R
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2008 Jul; 62(7):823-33. PubMed ID: 17522606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Workplace smoking ban policy and smoking behavior.
    Kim B
    J Prev Med Public Health; 2009 Sep; 42(5):293-7. PubMed ID: 19806001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Socioeconomic pattern of smoking in Japan: income inequality and gender and age differences.
    Fukuda Y; Nakamura K; Takano T
    Ann Epidemiol; 2005 May; 15(5):365-72. PubMed ID: 15840550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Social capital, institutional (vertical) trust and smoking: a study of daily smoking and smoking cessation among ever smokers.
    Lindström M; Janzon E
    Scand J Public Health; 2007; 35(5):460-7. PubMed ID: 17852983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.