These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18158225)

  • 1. Cerebral blood flow estimation from perfusion-weighted MRI using FT-based MMSE filtering method.
    Sakoglu U; Sood R
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Apr; 26(3):313-22. PubMed ID: 18158225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of FT-based MMSE deconvolution method for cerebral blood flow measurement in patients with leukoaraiosis.
    Sakoglu U; Huisa-Garate B; Rosenberg GA; Sood R
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jun; 27(5):625-30. PubMed ID: 19121907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Advantages of frequency-domain modeling in dynamic-susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance cerebral blood flow quantification.
    Chen JJ; Smith MR; Frayne R
    Magn Reson Med; 2005 Mar; 53(3):700-7. PubMed ID: 15723395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Aspects on the accuracy of cerebral perfusion parameters obtained by dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: a simulation study.
    Knutsson L; Ståhlberg F; Wirestam R
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Jul; 22(6):789-98. PubMed ID: 15234447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Autoregressive moving average (ARMA) model applied to quantification of cerebral blood flow using dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
    Murase K; Yamazaki Y; Shinohara M
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2003 Jul; 2(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 16210825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reference-based maximum upslope: a CBF quantification method without using arterial input function in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.
    Kimura T; Kusahara H
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2009; 8(3):107-20. PubMed ID: 19783874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A control point interpolation method for the non-parametric quantification of cerebral haemodynamics from dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.
    Mehndiratta A; MacIntosh BJ; Crane DE; Payne SJ; Chappell MA
    Neuroimage; 2013 Jan; 64():560-70. PubMed ID: 22975158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deconvolution analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced data based on singular value decomposition optimized by generalized cross validation.
    Murase K; Yamazaki Y; Miyazaki S
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2004; 3(4):165-75. PubMed ID: 16093635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of perfusion MRI in stroke: To deconvolve, or not to deconvolve.
    Meijs M; Christensen S; Lansberg MG; Albers GW; Calamante F
    Magn Reson Med; 2016 Oct; 76(4):1282-90. PubMed ID: 26519871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perfusion quantification by model-free arterial spin labeling using nonlinear stochastic regularization deconvolution.
    Ahlgren A; Wirestam R; Petersen ET; Ståhlberg F; Knutsson L
    Magn Reson Med; 2013 Nov; 70(5):1470-80. PubMed ID: 23281031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Precision, signal-to-noise ratio, and dose optimization of magnitude and phase arterial input functions in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.
    Kotys MS; Akbudak E; Markham J; Conturo TE
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Mar; 25(3):598-611. PubMed ID: 17326084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Whole brain quantitative CBF and CBV measurements using MRI bolus tracking: comparison of methodologies.
    Smith AM; Grandin CB; Duprez T; Mataigne F; Cosnard G
    Magn Reson Med; 2000 Apr; 43(4):559-64. PubMed ID: 10748431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Removing the effect of SVD algorithmic artifacts present in quantitative MR perfusion studies.
    Smith MR; Lu H; Trochet S; Frayne R
    Magn Reson Med; 2004 Mar; 51(3):631-4. PubMed ID: 15004809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An alternative viewpoint of the similarities and differences of SVD and FT deconvolution algorithms used for quantitative MR perfusion studies.
    Salluzzi M; Frayne R; Smith MR
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Apr; 23(3):481-92. PubMed ID: 15862650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automated detection of the arterial input function using normalized cut clustering to determine cerebral perfusion by dynamic susceptibility contrast-magnetic resonance imaging.
    Yin J; Sun H; Yang J; Guo Q
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Apr; 41(4):1071-8. PubMed ID: 24753102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tracer arrival timing-insensitive technique for estimating flow in MR perfusion-weighted imaging using singular value decomposition with a block-circulant deconvolution matrix.
    Wu O; Østergaard L; Weisskoff RM; Benner T; Rosen BR; Sorensen AG
    Magn Reson Med; 2003 Jul; 50(1):164-74. PubMed ID: 12815691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantification of bolus-tracking MRI: Improved characterization of the tissue residue function using Tikhonov regularization.
    Calamante F; Gadian DG; Connelly A
    Magn Reson Med; 2003 Dec; 50(6):1237-47. PubMed ID: 14648572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative cerebral blood flow with bolus tracking perfusion MRI: measurements in porcine model and comparison with H(2)(15)O PET.
    Kellner E; Mix M; Reisert M; Förster K; Nguyen-Thanh T; Splitthoff DN; Gall P; Kiselev VG; Mader I
    Magn Reson Med; 2014 Dec; 72(6):1723-34. PubMed ID: 24375612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of regional cerebral blood flow by dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI using different deconvolution techniques.
    Wirestam R; Andersson L; Ostergaard L; Bolling M; Aunola JP; Lindgren A; Geijer B; Holtås S; Ståhlberg F
    Magn Reson Med; 2000 May; 43(5):691-700. PubMed ID: 10800034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Wavelet-based noise reduction for improved deconvolution of time-series data in dynamic susceptibility-contrast MRI.
    Wirestam R; Ståhlberg F
    MAGMA; 2005 Jul; 18(3):113-8. PubMed ID: 15887036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.