These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18159064)

  • 1. Stat bite: Types of research misconduct.
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Jan; 100(1):8. PubMed ID: 18159064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Academic misconduct and detection.
    Wood BD
    Radiol Technol; 2010; 81(3):276-9. PubMed ID: 20051600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The problem of plagiarism.
    Anderson MS; Steneck NH
    Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 21194643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. HHS proposes revised regulations on misconduct in research.
    Shalev M
    Lab Anim (NY); 2004 Jun; 33(6):12-3. PubMed ID: 15179427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Plagiarism and other scientific misconducts.
    Höffken K; Gabbert H
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2009 Mar; 135(3):327-8. PubMed ID: 19125293
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frequent cases force China to face up to scientific fraud.
    Jia H
    Nat Med; 2006 Aug; 12(8):867. PubMed ID: 16892019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Scientific fraud. A disease we find among ourselves].
    Guimarães S
    Acta Med Port; 1998; 11(8-9):783-5. PubMed ID: 9951073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fighting plagiarism.
    Lancet; 2008 Jun; 371(9631):2146. PubMed ID: 18586154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scientific misconduct: ORI survey is flawed.
    Teitelbaum SL
    Nature; 2002 Dec 19-26; 420(6917):739-40. PubMed ID: 12490917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sociology. Scientific misconduct: do the punishments fit the crime?
    Redman BK; Merz JF
    Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5890):775. PubMed ID: 18687942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scientific misconduct: the state's role has limits.
    Korn D
    Nature; 2002 Dec 19-26; 420(6917):739. PubMed ID: 12490916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Research misconduct events increased yet again in 2002.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2003 Oct; 18(10):2. PubMed ID: 14682337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Plagiarism and misconduct in scientific publishing.
    Jones DS
    J Pharm Pharmacol; 2009 May; 61(5):539. PubMed ID: 19405991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scientists behaving badly.
    Martinson BC; Anderson MS; de Vries R
    Nature; 2005 Jun; 435(7043):737-8. PubMed ID: 15944677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Falsifying data is main problem in US research fraud review.
    Pownall M
    West J Med; 1999 Jun; 170(6):377. PubMed ID: 10443168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clamp down on copycats.
    Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7064):2. PubMed ID: 16267511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A tale of two citations.
    Errami M; Garner H
    Nature; 2008 Jan; 451(7177):397-9. PubMed ID: 18216832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Policing integrity.
    Nature; 2005 May; 435(7040):248. PubMed ID: 15902211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Romanian scientists fight plagiarism.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 2012 Aug; 488(7411):264-5. PubMed ID: 22895311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The 'truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth...'.
    Broome ME
    Nurs Outlook; 2008; 56(6):281-2. PubMed ID: 19041445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.