483 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18159756)
1. [Criteria of expert assessment of professional errors in dentistry].
Popova TG
Sud Med Ekspert; 2007; 50(6):25-7. PubMed ID: 18159756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Expert assessment of professional errors in stomatology].
Popova TG
Sud Med Ekspert; 2008; 51(3):35-7. PubMed ID: 18589675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [The methodological basis of expert assessment of unfavourable outcomes of the stomatological treatment in the framework of civil law proceedings].
Pigolkin IuI; Murzova TV; Mirzoev KhM
Sud Med Ekspert; 2011; 54(6):38-40. PubMed ID: 22384707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Innocent harm infliction in medical practice].
Ivshin IV
Sud Med Ekspert; 2005; 48(4):26-8. PubMed ID: 16130330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Expert criteria of prosthetic stomatological treatment quality control].
Popova TG
Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2008; 87(3):61-3. PubMed ID: 18577926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Failure to document may favor the patient in proof of malpractice].
Thiede A; Zimmermann HJ
Zentralbl Chir; 2011 Feb; 136(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 21351050
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Concerning the criteria of expert assessment of unfavorable outcomes in implantological stomatology].
Popova TG; Bazikian EA; Pashinian GA; Kamalian AV; Kuraeva EIu
Sud Med Ekspert; 2008; 51(2):21-3. PubMed ID: 18450094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The analysis of the unfavourable outcomes of dental care based on the materials of forensic medical examinations carried out by the Bureau of Forensic Medical Expertise, Moscow Department of Health].
Pigolkin IuI; Murzova TV; Zharov VV; Zaĭtsev VV; Mirzoev KhM
Sud Med Ekspert; 2012; 55(2):25-7. PubMed ID: 22686052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [From the expert's office: The operation report and expert opinion].
Schneider G; Brusis T; Michel O
Laryngorhinootologie; 2011 Jan; 90(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 21225532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. US Supreme Court decisions, expert testimony, and implant dentistry.
Flanagan D
J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(2):97-8. PubMed ID: 12498453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Guidelines for expert testimony in implant dentistry.
Flanagan D
J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(2):99-100. PubMed ID: 12498454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Communication - a treatment error? The proper behavior "afterward"].
Erhard D
Aktuelle Urol; 2013 May; 44(3):180-3. PubMed ID: 23712273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Forensic-medical obstetric-gynecological examinations in cases on professional delinquency of medical personnel].
Dmitrieva OA; Fedchenko TM; Goncharenko DV; Iurtaeva EA; Pichugin AP
Sud Med Ekspert; 2007; 50(4):24-7. PubMed ID: 17718085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [On the assessment of the competence of forensic medical examination in relation to the "doctors' affair"].
Zoroastrov OM; Lotter MG
Sud Med Ekspert; 2009; 52(1):55-6. PubMed ID: 19371015
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Aspects of dento/medico-legal report writing.
Wood GD
Dent Update; 2014 Mar; 41(2):161-2, 164-6. PubMed ID: 24783885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Forensic dentistry. Civil litigation and the narrative report.
Chrz B
J Okla Dent Assoc; 1997; 88(2):31, 42, 54. PubMed ID: 9540705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Gastroenterology - accusations and errors in treatment: evaluation of the completed expertise process in internal medicine of the expert committee of North Rhineland for the years 2001 to 2005].
Weber B; Becker K; Strohmeyer G
Z Gastroenterol; 2008 Aug; 46(8):766-70. PubMed ID: 18759199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bungled bite mark evidence collection: a proposed protocol for the prevention thereof.
Bernitz H; van Niekerk PJ
SADJ; 2003 Feb; 58(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 12705100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The juridical significance of primary medical documentation].
Sergeev IuD; Bisiuk IuV
Klin Med (Mosk); 2007; 85(12):72-3. PubMed ID: 18318173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Expert Opinion Cases - What documentation is necessary from a legal perspective?].
Weis E
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2016 May; 51(5):328-35. PubMed ID: 27219297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
