These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

480 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18159756)

  • 1. [Criteria of expert assessment of professional errors in dentistry].
    Popova TG
    Sud Med Ekspert; 2007; 50(6):25-7. PubMed ID: 18159756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Expert assessment of professional errors in stomatology].
    Popova TG
    Sud Med Ekspert; 2008; 51(3):35-7. PubMed ID: 18589675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The methodological basis of expert assessment of unfavourable outcomes of the stomatological treatment in the framework of civil law proceedings].
    Pigolkin IuI; Murzova TV; Mirzoev KhM
    Sud Med Ekspert; 2011; 54(6):38-40. PubMed ID: 22384707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Innocent harm infliction in medical practice].
    Ivshin IV
    Sud Med Ekspert; 2005; 48(4):26-8. PubMed ID: 16130330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Expert criteria of prosthetic stomatological treatment quality control].
    Popova TG
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2008; 87(3):61-3. PubMed ID: 18577926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Failure to document may favor the patient in proof of malpractice].
    Thiede A; Zimmermann HJ
    Zentralbl Chir; 2011 Feb; 136(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 21351050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Concerning the criteria of expert assessment of unfavorable outcomes in implantological stomatology].
    Popova TG; Bazikian EA; Pashinian GA; Kamalian AV; Kuraeva EIu
    Sud Med Ekspert; 2008; 51(2):21-3. PubMed ID: 18450094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The analysis of the unfavourable outcomes of dental care based on the materials of forensic medical examinations carried out by the Bureau of Forensic Medical Expertise, Moscow Department of Health].
    Pigolkin IuI; Murzova TV; Zharov VV; Zaĭtsev VV; Mirzoev KhM
    Sud Med Ekspert; 2012; 55(2):25-7. PubMed ID: 22686052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [From the expert's office: The operation report and expert opinion].
    Schneider G; Brusis T; Michel O
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2011 Jan; 90(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 21225532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. US Supreme Court decisions, expert testimony, and implant dentistry.
    Flanagan D
    J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(2):97-8. PubMed ID: 12498453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Guidelines for expert testimony in implant dentistry.
    Flanagan D
    J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(2):99-100. PubMed ID: 12498454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Communication - a treatment error? The proper behavior "afterward"].
    Erhard D
    Aktuelle Urol; 2013 May; 44(3):180-3. PubMed ID: 23712273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Forensic-medical obstetric-gynecological examinations in cases on professional delinquency of medical personnel].
    Dmitrieva OA; Fedchenko TM; Goncharenko DV; Iurtaeva EA; Pichugin AP
    Sud Med Ekspert; 2007; 50(4):24-7. PubMed ID: 17718085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [On the assessment of the competence of forensic medical examination in relation to the "doctors' affair"].
    Zoroastrov OM; Lotter MG
    Sud Med Ekspert; 2009; 52(1):55-6. PubMed ID: 19371015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Aspects of dento/medico-legal report writing.
    Wood GD
    Dent Update; 2014 Mar; 41(2):161-2, 164-6. PubMed ID: 24783885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Forensic dentistry. Civil litigation and the narrative report.
    Chrz B
    J Okla Dent Assoc; 1997; 88(2):31, 42, 54. PubMed ID: 9540705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Gastroenterology - accusations and errors in treatment: evaluation of the completed expertise process in internal medicine of the expert committee of North Rhineland for the years 2001 to 2005].
    Weber B; Becker K; Strohmeyer G
    Z Gastroenterol; 2008 Aug; 46(8):766-70. PubMed ID: 18759199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bungled bite mark evidence collection: a proposed protocol for the prevention thereof.
    Bernitz H; van Niekerk PJ
    SADJ; 2003 Feb; 58(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 12705100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The juridical significance of primary medical documentation].
    Sergeev IuD; Bisiuk IuV
    Klin Med (Mosk); 2007; 85(12):72-3. PubMed ID: 18318173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Expert Opinion Cases - What documentation is necessary from a legal perspective?].
    Weis E
    Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2016 May; 51(5):328-35. PubMed ID: 27219297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.