These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18160941)

  • 21. Trends in Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Techniques for Nonmalignant Conditions in a Defined Population.
    Hansdottir K; Gudmundsson JA
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2018; 83(2):198-202. PubMed ID: 28848157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Updated hysterectomy surveillance and factors associated with minimally invasive hysterectomy.
    Cohen SL; Vitonis AF; Einarsson JI
    JSLS; 2014; 18(3):. PubMed ID: 25392662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Hysterectomy types in Estonia are still different from the Nordic countries.
    Veerus P; Lang K; Toompere K; Kirss F
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 May; 94(5):489-93. PubMed ID: 25711677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. National trends and determinants of hospitalization costs and lengths-of-stay for uterine fibroids procedures.
    Becker ER
    J Health Care Finance; 2007; 33(3):1-16. PubMed ID: 19175228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Total abdominal hysterectomy versus laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total vaginal hysterectomy.
    Shiota M; Kotani Y; Umemoto M; Tobiume T; Shimaoka M; Hoshiai H
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2011 Nov; 4(4):161-5. PubMed ID: 22776300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uteri: a randomized clinical trial.
    Benassi L; Rossi T; Kaihura CT; Ricci L; Bedocchi L; Galanti B; Vadora E
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Dec; 187(6):1561-5. PubMed ID: 12501064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Nationwide trends in the utilization of and payments for hysterectomy in the United States among commercially insured women.
    Morgan DM; Kamdar NS; Swenson CW; Kobernik EK; Sammarco AG; Nallamothu B
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr; 218(4):425.e1-425.e18. PubMed ID: 29288067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Regional and temporal variation in hysterectomy rates and surgical routes for benign diseases in the Netherlands.
    Hanstede MM; Burger MJ; Timmermans A; Burger MP
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Feb; 91(2):220-5. PubMed ID: 22043840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A US population-based study of uterine fibroid diagnosis incidence, trends, and prevalence: 2005 through 2014.
    Yu O; Scholes D; Schulze-Rath R; Grafton J; Hansen K; Reed SD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Dec; 219(6):591.e1-591.e8. PubMed ID: 30291840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Incidence of sarcoma in patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications: a population-based study.
    Multinu F; Casarin J; Tortorella L; Huang Y; Weaver A; Angioni S; Melis GB; Mariani A; Stewart EA; Laughlin-Tommaso SK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Feb; 220(2):179.e1-179.e10. PubMed ID: 30447212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparative Effectiveness of Uterine Leiomyoma Procedures Using a Large Insurance Claims Database.
    Borah BJ; Yao X; Laughlin-Tommaso SK; Heien HC; Stewart EA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 130(5):1047-1056. PubMed ID: 29016510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Hysterectomy outcomes in patients with similar indications.
    Kovac SR
    Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 95(6 Pt 1):787-93. PubMed ID: 10831967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Decreasing trend and changing indications of hysterectomy in Finland.
    Hakkarainen J; Nevala A; Tomás E; Nieminen K; Malila N; Pitkäniemi J; Auranen A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Sep; 100(9):1722-1729. PubMed ID: 33797081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Decreasing trend of hysterectomy in Taiwan: A population-based study, 1997-2010.
    Lai JC; Huang N; Huang SM; Hu HY; Wang CW; Chou YJ; Wang KL
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 54(5):512-8. PubMed ID: 26522101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The outcome of subtotal abdominal hysterectomy.
    Iftikhar R
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 Oct; 15(10):594-6. PubMed ID: 19810293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy for Uterine Leiomyomas: A Comparison of Complications and Costs.
    Ngan TYT; Zakhari A; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Tulandi T; Abenhaim HA
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2018 Apr; 40(4):432-439. PubMed ID: 29032064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Inpatient surgical treatment patterns for patients with uterine fibroids in the United States, 1998-2002.
    Becker ER; Spalding J; DuChane J; Horowitz IR
    J Natl Med Assoc; 2005 Oct; 97(10):1336-42. PubMed ID: 16353655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Utilization of apical vaginal support procedures at time of inpatient hysterectomy performed for benign conditions: a national estimate.
    Ross WT; Meister MR; Shepherd JP; Olsen MA; Lowder JL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):436.e1-436.e8. PubMed ID: 28716634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Hysterectomy on benign indications in Sweden 1987-2003: a nationwide trend analysis.
    Lundholm C; Forsgren C; Johansson AL; Cnattingius S; Altman D
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 19140043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Hysterectomy prevalence and adjusted cervical and uterine cancer rates in England and Wales.
    Redburn JC; Murphy MF
    BJOG; 2001 Apr; 108(4):388-95. PubMed ID: 11305546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.