These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18161369)

  • 1. [Methods of extracting AEP for monitoring the anesthetic depth].
    Tian FY; Le JW; Wang Q
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2007 Sep; 31(5):330-2. PubMed ID: 18161369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changes in rapidly extracted auditory evoked potentials during tracheal intubation.
    Urhonen E; Jensen EW; Lund J
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2000 Jul; 44(6):743-8. PubMed ID: 10903020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Autoregressive modeling with exogenous input of middle-latency auditory-evoked potentials to measure rapid changes in depth of anesthesia.
    Jensen EW; Lindholm P; Henneberg SW
    Methods Inf Med; 1996 Sep; 35(3):256-60. PubMed ID: 8952311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory evoked potentials for the assessment of depth of anaesthesia: different configurations of artefact detection algorithms.
    Luecke D; Stockmanns G; Gallinat M; Kochs EF; Schneider G
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2007 Feb; 52(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 17313341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The measurement of anesthetic depth].
    Guan F; Li Z
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Feb; 26(1):211-5. PubMed ID: 19334589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of conventional averaged and rapid averaged, autoregressive-based extracted auditory evoked potentials for monitoring the hypnotic level during propofol induction.
    Litvan H; Jensen EW; Galan J; Lund J; Rodriguez BE; Henneberg SW; Caminal P; Villar Landeira JM
    Anesthesiology; 2002 Aug; 97(2):351-8. PubMed ID: 12151924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. NeuMonD: a tool for the development of new indicators of anaesthetic effect.
    Stockmanns G; Ningler M; Omerovic A; Kochs EF; Schneider G
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2007 Feb; 52(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 17313342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On-line analysis of AEP and EEG for monitoring depth of anaesthesia.
    Capitanio L; Jensen EW; Filligoi GC; Makovec B; Gagliardi M; Henneberg SW; Lindholm P; Cerutti S
    Methods Inf Med; 1997 Dec; 36(4-5):311-4. PubMed ID: 9470386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A combination of electroencephalogram and auditory evoked potentials separates different levels of anesthesia in volunteers.
    Horn B; Pilge S; Kochs EF; Stockmanns G; Hock A; Schneider G
    Anesth Analg; 2009 May; 108(5):1512-21. PubMed ID: 19372330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Technology of Processed Electroencephalogram Monitoring Devices for Assessment of Depth of Anesthesia.
    Fahy BG; Chau DF
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Jan; 126(1):111-117. PubMed ID: 28786839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory evoked potentials.
    De Cosmo G; Aceto P; Clemente A; Congedo E
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2004 May; 70(5):293-7. PubMed ID: 15181406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of the AEP-Monitor/2-derived composite auditory-evoked potential index on propofol consumption and emergence times during total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil in children.
    Weber F; Seidl M; Bein T
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2005 Mar; 49(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 15752388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A system for tracking changes in the mid-latency evoked potential during anesthesia.
    Hansson M; Gänsler T; Salomonsson G
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Mar; 45(3):323-34. PubMed ID: 9509748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Advance in signal analysis of auditory evoked potential].
    Yang J; Peng C; Wu B
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Sep; 20(3):563-6. PubMed ID: 14565040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the two different auditory evoked potentials index monitors in propofol-fentanyl-nitrous oxide anesthesia.
    Nishiyama T
    J Clin Anesth; 2009 Dec; 21(8):551-4. PubMed ID: 20122585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The discriminant power of simultaneous monitoring of spontaneous electroencephalogram and evoked potentials as a predictor of different clinical states of general anesthesia.
    Jeleazcov C; Schneider G; Daunderer M; Scheller B; Schüttler J; Schwilden H
    Anesth Analg; 2006 Oct; 103(4):894-901. PubMed ID: 17000800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intraoperative auditory evoked potential recordings are more reliable at signal detection from different sensor sites on the forehead compared to bispectral index.
    Ishioka Y; Sugino S; Hayase T; Janicki PK
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Feb; 31(1):117-122. PubMed ID: 26661716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Monitoring the depth of anesthesia using a fuzzy neural network based on EEG].
    Li M; Ye ZQ
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2006 Jul; 30(4):253-5. PubMed ID: 17039930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Limitations in the rapid extraction of evoked potentials using parametric modeling.
    De Silva AC; Sinclair NC; Liley DT
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 May; 59(5):1462-71. PubMed ID: 22394572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison in adolescents of composite auditory evoked potential index and bispectral index during propofol-remifentanil anesthesia for scoliosis surgery with intraoperative wake-up test.
    Blussé van Oud-Alblas HJ; Peters JW; de Leeuw TG; Vermeylen KT; de Klerk LW; Tibboel D; Klein J; Weber F
    Anesth Analg; 2008 Nov; 107(5):1683-8. PubMed ID: 18931233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.