90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18161546)
1. Comparing two medical tests when results of reference standard are unavailable for those negative via both tests.
Kondratovich MV
J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(1):145-66. PubMed ID: 18161546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimation of disease prevalence, true positive rate, and false positive rate of two screening tests when disease verification is applied on only screen-positives: a hierarchical model using multi-center data.
Stock EM; Stamey JD; Sankaranarayanan R; Young DM; Muwonge R; Arbyn M
Cancer Epidemiol; 2012 Apr; 36(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 21856264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing disease screening tests when true disease status is ascertained only for screen positives.
Pepe MS; Alonzo TA
Biostatistics; 2001 Sep; 2(3):249-60. PubMed ID: 12933537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Verification bias-corrected estimators of the relative true and false positive rates of two binary screening tests.
Alonzo TA
Stat Med; 2005 Feb; 24(3):403-17. PubMed ID: 15543634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Some issues in resolution of diagnostic tests using an imperfect gold standard.
Hawkins DM; Garrett JA; Stephenson B
Stat Med; 2001 Jul; 20(13):1987-2001. PubMed ID: 11427955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Exercise Tolerance Test: a comparison between true positive and false positive test results.
Faisal AW; Abid AR; Azhar M
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2007; 19(4):71-4. PubMed ID: 18693603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Avoiding verification bias in screening test evaluation in resource poor settings: a case study from Zimbabwe.
Gaffikin L; McGrath J; Arbyn M; Blumenthal PD
Clin Trials; 2008; 5(5):496-503. PubMed ID: 18827042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Supporting diagnosis of attention-deficit hyperactive disorder with novelty detection.
Lee HJ; Cho S; Shin MS
Artif Intell Med; 2008 Mar; 42(3):199-212. PubMed ID: 18187311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing accuracy in an unpaired post-market device study with incomplete disease assessment.
Alonzo TA
Biom J; 2009 Jun; 51(3):491-503. PubMed ID: 19572317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Design and analysis of qualitative collaborative studies: minimum collaborative program.
McClure FD
J Assoc Off Anal Chem; 1990; 73(6):953-60. PubMed ID: 2289928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Roaming through methodology. XXXII. False test results].
van der Weijden T; van den Akker M
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 May; 145(19):906-8. PubMed ID: 11387865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Forget the blood, not the stone! Microhaematuria in acute urolithiasis and the role of early CT scanning.
Xafis K; Thalmann G; Benneker LM; Stoupis C; Buggy DJ; Zimmermann H; Exadaktylos AK
Emerg Med J; 2008 Oct; 25(10):640-4. PubMed ID: 18843059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using pseudogold standards and latent-class analysis in combination to evaluate the accuracy of three diagnostic tests.
Nérette P; Stryhn H; Dohoo I; Hammell L
Prev Vet Med; 2008 Jul; 85(3-4):207-25. PubMed ID: 18355935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing dichotomous screening tests when individuals negative on both tests are not verified.
Chock C; Irwig L; Berry G; Glasziou P
J Clin Epidemiol; 1997 Nov; 50(11):1211-7. PubMed ID: 9393377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sample size for comparing correlated concordance rates.
Jung SH; Barnhart HX; Sohn I; Stinnett SS; Wallace DK
J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(2):359-69. PubMed ID: 18327726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Monothermal caloric screening test performance: a relative operating characteristic curve analysis.
Murnane OD; Akin FW; Lynn SG; Cyr DG
Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 19322091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Interest of a new instrument to assess cognition in schizophrenia: The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS)].
Bralet MC; Navarre M; Eskenazi AM; Lucas-Ross M; Falissard B
Encephale; 2008 Dec; 34(6):557-62. PubMed ID: 19081451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pitfalls of internet-accessible diagnostic tests: inadequate performance of a CE-marked Chlamydia test for home use.
Michel CE; Saison FG; Joshi H; Mahilum-Tapay LM; Lee HH
Sex Transm Infect; 2009 Jun; 85(3):187-9. PubMed ID: 19398434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. False positive rate of thoracic outlet syndrome diagnostic maneuvers.
Nord KM; Kapoor P; Fisher J; Thomas G; Sundaram A; Scott K; Kothari MJ
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Mar; 48(2):67-74. PubMed ID: 18435210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. McNemar chi2 test revisited: comparing sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic examinations.
Trajman A; Luiz RR
Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2008; 68(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 18224558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
