These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18162635)

  • 1. Does using nonnumerical terms to describe risk aid violence risk communication? Clinician agreement and decision making.
    Zoe Hilton N; Carter AM; Harris GT; Sharpe AJ
    J Interpers Violence; 2008 Feb; 23(2):171-88. PubMed ID: 18162635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving forensic tribunal decisions: the role of the clinician.
    McKee SA; Harris GT; Rice ME
    Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(4):485-506. PubMed ID: 17620273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk communication: clinicians' reported approaches and perceived values.
    Heilbrun K; Philipson J; Berman L; Warren J
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(3):397-406. PubMed ID: 10509939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Applying a forensic actuarial assessment (the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide) to nonforensic patients.
    Harris GT; Rice ME; Camilleri JA
    J Interpers Violence; 2004 Sep; 19(9):1063-74. PubMed ID: 15296617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of violence risk in youth for juvenile court: relevant factors for clinical judgment.
    Duits N; Doreleijers TA; van den Brink W
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(3):236-40. PubMed ID: 18538397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Twenty years of progress in violence risk assessment.
    Hanson RK
    J Interpers Violence; 2005 Feb; 20(2):212-7. PubMed ID: 15601794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting violence among forensic-correctional populations: the past 2 decades of advancements and future endeavors.
    Loza W; Dhaliwal GK
    J Interpers Violence; 2005 Feb; 20(2):188-94. PubMed ID: 15601791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of clinical training on violence risk assessment.
    McNiel DE; Chamberlain JR; Weaver CM; Hall SE; Fordwood SR; Binder RL
    Am J Psychiatry; 2008 Feb; 165(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 18245189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies.
    Hanson RK; Morton-Bourgon KE
    Psychol Assess; 2009 Mar; 21(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 19290762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cues they use: clinicians' endorsement of risk cues in predictions of dangerousness.
    Odeh MS; Zeiss RA; Huss MT
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 16557618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Advances in the assessment and prediction of interpersonal violence.
    Mills JF
    J Interpers Violence; 2005 Feb; 20(2):236-41. PubMed ID: 15601798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Screening practices for adolescent dating violence.
    Brown LK; Puster KL; Vazquez EA; Hunter HL; Lescano CM
    J Interpers Violence; 2007 Apr; 22(4):456-64. PubMed ID: 17369447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Police response to domestic violence: making decisions about risk and risk management.
    Perez Trujillo M; Ross S
    J Interpers Violence; 2008 Apr; 23(4):454-73. PubMed ID: 18252942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Presenting health risk information in different formats: the effect on participants' cognitive and emotional evaluation and decisions.
    Timmermans DR; Ockhuysen-Vermey CF; Henneman L
    Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Dec; 73(3):443-7. PubMed ID: 18722073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Models based on value and probability in health improve shared decision making.
    Ortendahl M
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):714-7. PubMed ID: 19018900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Understanding Clinicians' Use of Cues When Assessing the Future Risk of Violence: A Clinical Judgement Analysis in the Psychiatric Setting.
    Brown B; Rakow T
    Clin Psychol Psychother; 2016; 23(2):125-41. PubMed ID: 25652696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are violence risk assessment tools clinically useful?
    Carroll A
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2007 Apr; 41(4):301-7. PubMed ID: 17464716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing normative approaches to communicating violence risk: a national survey of psychologists.
    Heilbrun K; O'Neill ML; Stevens TN; Strohman LK; Bowman Q; Lo YW
    Behav Sci Law; 2004; 22(2):187-96. PubMed ID: 15048858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of framing actuarial risk probabilities on involuntary civil commitment decisions.
    Scurich N; John RS
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Apr; 35(2):83-91. PubMed ID: 20145984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predictive validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) during residential treatment.
    Lodewijks HP; Doreleijers TA; de Ruiter C; Borum R
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(3):263-71. PubMed ID: 18508122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.