These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
423 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18164741)
1. Relation between fixation disparity and the asymmetry between convergent and divergent disparity step responses. Jaschinski W; Svede A; Jainta S Vision Res; 2008 Jan; 48(2):253-63. PubMed ID: 18164741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relation between static and dynamic aspects of vergence, estimated with a subjective test using flashed dichoptic nonius lines. Jaschinski W Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Sep; 24(5):399-410. PubMed ID: 15315654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vergence dynamics and variability of fixation disparity in children and adults. Jaschinski W; König M Strabismus; 2006 Jun; 14(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 16760113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Objective and subjective measures of vergence step responses. Jainta S; Hoormann J; Jaschinski W Vision Res; 2007 Dec; 47(26):3238-46. PubMed ID: 17959213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Subjective fixation disparity affected by dynamic asymmetry, resting vergence, and nonius bias. Svede A; Hoormann J; Jainta S; Jaschinski W Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jun; 52(7):4356-61. PubMed ID: 21467184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Objective vs subjective measures of fixation disparity for short and long fixation periods. Jaschinski W; Jainta S; Kloke WB Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Jul; 30(4):379-90. PubMed ID: 20629960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Capture of visual direction in dynamic vergence is reduced with flashed monocular lines. Jaschinski W; Jainta S; Schürer M Vision Res; 2006 Aug; 46(16):2608-14. PubMed ID: 16530245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Vergence dynamics and variability of fixation disparity in school children with reading-spelling disorders]. Jaschinski W; König M; Schmidt R; Methling D Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 Oct; 221(10):854-61. PubMed ID: 15499521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fixation disparity and accommodation as a function of viewing distance and prism load. Jaschinski W Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Jul; 17(4):324-39. PubMed ID: 9390377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stereoscopic depth magnitude estimation: effects of stimulus spatial frequency and eccentricity. Cisarik PM; Harwerth RS Behav Brain Res; 2005 May; 160(1):88-98. PubMed ID: 15836903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Individual objective versus subjective fixation disparity as a function of forced vergence. Jaschinski W PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0199958. PubMed ID: 29980146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Fixation disparity with the Pola pointing test: not representative for eye position under natural viewing conditions]. Gerling J; Ball M; Bömer T; Bach M; Kommerell G Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1998 Apr; 212(4):226-33. PubMed ID: 9644669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The prism that aligns fixation disparity does not predict the self-selected prism. Otto JM; Bach M; Kommerell G Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Nov; 28(6):550-7. PubMed ID: 19076557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adaptive changes in dynamic properties of human disparity-induced vergence. Takagi M; Oyamada H; Abe H; Zee DS; Hasebe H; Miki A; Usui T; Hasegawa S; Bando T Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Jun; 42(7):1479-86. PubMed ID: 11381050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Objective vs subjective measurements of dark vergence. Jaschinski W; Jainta S; Hoormann J; Walper N Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Jan; 27(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 17239194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]