These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18166019)

  • 21. Structure-based development of target-specific compound libraries.
    Orry AJ; Abagyan RA; Cavasotto CN
    Drug Discov Today; 2006 Mar; 11(5-6):261-6. PubMed ID: 16580603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A common reference framework for analyzing/comparing proteins and ligands. Fingerprints for Ligands and Proteins (FLAP): theory and application.
    Baroni M; Cruciani G; Sciabola S; Perruccio F; Mason JS
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(2):279-94. PubMed ID: 17381166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Structural e-bioinformatics and drug design.
    Carpy AJ; Marchand-Geneste N
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2006 Feb; 17(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 16513548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Finding ligands for G protein-coupled receptors based on the protein-compound affinity matrix.
    Fukunishi Y; Kubota S; Nakamura H
    J Mol Graph Model; 2007 Jan; 25(5):633-43. PubMed ID: 16777448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Fast and accurate predictions of protein stability changes upon mutations using statistical potentials and neural networks: PoPMuSiC-2.0.
    Dehouck Y; Grosfils A; Folch B; Gilis D; Bogaerts P; Rooman M
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Oct; 25(19):2537-43. PubMed ID: 19654118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Blind docking of drug-sized compounds to proteins with up to a thousand residues.
    Hetényi C; van der Spoel D
    FEBS Lett; 2006 Feb; 580(5):1447-50. PubMed ID: 16460734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Maximum common binding modes (MCBM): consensus docking scoring using multiple ligand information and interaction fingerprints.
    Renner S; Derksen S; Radestock S; Mörchen F
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Feb; 48(2):319-32. PubMed ID: 18211051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Managing protein flexibility in docking and its applications.
    B-Rao C; Subramanian J; Sharma SD
    Drug Discov Today; 2009 Apr; 14(7-8):394-400. PubMed ID: 19185058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The use of protein-ligand interaction fingerprints in docking.
    Brewerton SC
    Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2008 May; 11(3):356-64. PubMed ID: 18428089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Normalizing molecular docking rankings using virtually generated decoys.
    Wallach I; Jaitly N; Nguyen K; Schapira M; Lilien R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Aug; 51(8):1817-30. PubMed ID: 21699246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Synergistic use of compound properties and docking scores in neural network modeling of CYP2D6 binding: predicting affinity and conformational sampling.
    Bazeley PS; Prithivi S; Struble CA; Povinelli RJ; Sem DS
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2698-708. PubMed ID: 17125210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A novel approach to local similarity of protein binding sites substantially improves computational drug design results.
    Ramensky V; Sobol A; Zaitseva N; Rubinov A; Zosimov V
    Proteins; 2007 Nov; 69(2):349-57. PubMed ID: 17623865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Protein-ligand docking against non-native protein conformers.
    Verdonk ML; Mortenson PN; Hall RJ; Hartshorn MJ; Murray CW
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Nov; 48(11):2214-25. PubMed ID: 18954138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of input differences on the results of docking calculations.
    Feher M; Williams CI
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jul; 49(7):1704-14. PubMed ID: 19530660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accuracy of binding mode prediction with a cascadic stochastic tunneling method.
    Fischer B; Basili S; Merlitz H; Wenzel W
    Proteins; 2007 Jul; 68(1):195-204. PubMed ID: 17427957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Using pseudo amino acid composition to predict protein subcellular location: approached with amino acid composition distribution.
    Shi JY; Zhang SW; Pan Q; Zhou GP
    Amino Acids; 2008 Aug; 35(2):321-7. PubMed ID: 18209947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A filter enhanced sampling and combinatorial scoring study for protein docking in CAPRI.
    Gong XQ; Chang S; Zhang QH; Li CH; Shen LZ; Ma XH; Wang MH; Liu B; He HQ; Chen WZ; Wang CX
    Proteins; 2007 Dec; 69(4):859-65. PubMed ID: 17803223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Ligand-protein docking with water molecules.
    Roberts BC; Mancera RL
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Feb; 48(2):397-408. PubMed ID: 18211049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. InCa-SiteFinder: a method for structure-based prediction of inositol and carbohydrate binding sites on proteins.
    Kulharia M; Bridgett SJ; Goody RS; Jackson RM
    J Mol Graph Model; 2009 Oct; 28(3):297-303. PubMed ID: 19762259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An empirical approach for detecting nucleotide-binding sites on proteins.
    Saito M; Go M; Shirai T
    Protein Eng Des Sel; 2006 Feb; 19(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 16403825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.