211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18166744)
1. Cardiac output determination by thermodilution and arterial pulse waveform analysis in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement.
Staier K; Wiesenack C; Günkel L; Keyl C
Can J Anaesth; 2008 Jan; 55(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 18166744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of FloTrac cardiac output monitoring system in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with pulmonary artery cardiac output measurements.
Cannesson M; Attof Y; Rosamel P; Joseph P; Bastien O; Lehot JJ
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2007 Oct; 24(10):832-9. PubMed ID: 17666154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cardiac output measurement in patients undergoing liver transplantation: pulmonary artery catheter versus uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis.
Biais M; Nouette-Gaulain K; Cottenceau V; Vallet A; Cochard JF; Revel P; Sztark F
Anesth Analg; 2008 May; 106(5):1480-6, table of contents. PubMed ID: 18420863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity of an arterial pressure waveform analysis device: does the puncture site play a role in the agreement with intermittent pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution measurements?
Schramm S; Albrecht E; Frascarolo P; Chassot PG; Spahn DR
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2010 Apr; 24(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 19700347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Uncalibrated arterial pulse contour analysis versus continuous thermodilution technique: effects of alterations in arterial waveform.
Lorsomradee S; Lorsomradee S; Cromheecke S; De Hert SG
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2007 Oct; 21(5):636-43. PubMed ID: 17905266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pulse contour analysis after normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass in cardiac surgery patients.
Sander M; von Heymann C; Foer A; von Dossow V; Grosse J; Dushe S; Konertz WF; Spies CD
Crit Care; 2005; 9(6):R729-34. PubMed ID: 16356221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of cardiac output measurements with pulse contour analysis (PulseCO) and Doppler echocardiography during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
Missant C; Rex S; Wouters PF
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Mar; 25(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 17996125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cardiac output measured by a new arterial pressure waveform analysis method without calibration compared with thermodilution after cardiac surgery.
Breukers RM; Sepehrkhouy S; Spiegelenberg SR; Groeneveld AB
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2007 Oct; 21(5):632-5. PubMed ID: 17905265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Continuous cardiac output measurement: arterial pressure analysis versus thermodilution technique during cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.
Lorsomradee S; Lorsomradee SR; Cromheecke S; De Hert SG
Anaesthesia; 2007 Oct; 62(10):979-83. PubMed ID: 17845647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cardiac output determination from endotracheally measured impedance cardiography: clinical evaluation of endotracheal cardiac output monitor.
Maus TM; Reber B; Banks DA; Berry A; Guerrero E; Manecke GR
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2011 Oct; 25(5):770-5. PubMed ID: 21354828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multicenter study verifying a method of noninvasive continuous cardiac output measurement using pulse wave transit time: a comparison with intermittent bolus thermodilution cardiac output.
Yamada T; Tsutsui M; Sugo Y; Sato T; Akazawa T; Sato N; Yamashita K; Ishihara H; Takeda J
Anesth Analg; 2012 Jul; 115(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 22467885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nurse-determined assessment of cardiac output. Comparing a non-invasive cardiac output device and pulmonary artery catheter: a prospective observational study.
Corley A; Barnett AG; Mullany D; Fraser JF
Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1291-7. PubMed ID: 19423107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparison of ICG thoracic bioimpedance cardiac output monitoring system in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with pulmonary artery cardiac output measurements].
Simon R; Desebbe O; Hénaine R; Bastien O; Lehot JJ; Cannesson M
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2009 Jun; 28(6):537-41. PubMed ID: 19525086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cardiac output--pulse contour analysis vs. pulmonary artery thermodilution.
Ostergaard M; Nielsen J; Rasmussen JP; Berthelsen PG
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2006 Oct; 50(9):1044-9. PubMed ID: 16987334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of uncalibrated arterial waveform analysis in cardiac surgery patients with thermodilution cardiac output measurements.
Sander M; Spies CD; Grubitzsch H; Foer A; Müller M; von Heymann C
Crit Care; 2006; 10(6):R164. PubMed ID: 17118186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Semi-invasive monitoring of cardiac output by a new device using arterial pressure waveform analysis: a comparison with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
Mayer J; Boldt J; Schöllhorn T; Röhm KD; Mengistu AM; Suttner S
Br J Anaesth; 2007 Feb; 98(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 17218375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An uncalibrated pulse contour method to measure cardiac output during aortic counterpulsation.
Scolletta S; Franchi F; Taccone FS; Donadello K; Biagioli B; Vincent JL
Anesth Analg; 2011 Dec; 113(6):1389-95. PubMed ID: 22003226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Partial CO(2) rebreathing technique versus thermodilution: measurement of cardiac output before and after operations with extracorporeal circulation].
Neuhäuser C; Müller M; Bräu M; Scholz S; Böning O; Roth P; Hempelmann G
Anaesthesist; 2002 Aug; 51(8):625-33. PubMed ID: 12391521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability of cardiac output measurements using LiDCOrapid™ and FloTrac/Vigileo™ across broad ranges of cardiac output values.
Asamoto M; Orii R; Otsuji M; Bougaki M; Imai Y; Yamada Y
J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Aug; 31(4):709-716. PubMed ID: 27300325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cardiac output measurements with electrical velocimetry in patients undergoing CABG surgery: a comparison with intermittent thermodilution.
Mekis D; Kamenik M; Starc V; Jeretin S
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Mar; 25(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 17850685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
