These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1816823)

  • 1. [Results of cephalometric-anthropometric measurements of the nasal profile of patients with ClassII/1 anomalies].
    Sterzik G; Wortha HP; Sterzik M
    Dtsch Stomatol (1990); 1991; 41(5):170-3. PubMed ID: 1816823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Profile modifications induced by orthodontic forces studied by an analysis of the nasolabial angle].
    Chimenti C; Mastromatteo LM; Monaco A; Capogna D
    Minerva Stomatol; 1994 Dec; 43(12):585-90. PubMed ID: 7739493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Findings for validity of Dresden cephalometric (by Hasund)].
    Rädlinger J; Harzer W; Reinhardt A; Dramm P
    Prakt Kieferorthop; 1991 Sep; 5(3):229-34. PubMed ID: 1815804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cephalometric analysis of profile nasal esthetics. Part II. Patients with vertical maxillary excess.
    de Assis EA; Starck WJ; Epker BN
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1996; 11(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 9456623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Effect of breathing mode and nose ventilation on growth of the facial bones].
    Baumann I; Plinkert PK
    HNO; 1996 May; 44(5):229-34. PubMed ID: 8707626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Thin-plate spline analysis of craniofacial growth in Class I and Class II subjects.
    Franchi L; Baccetti T; Stahl F; McNamara JA
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Jul; 77(4):595-601. PubMed ID: 17605492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cephalometric evaluation of Class II malocclusions in transitional dentition.
    Kapoor S; Kapoor DN; Jaiswal JN
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2001 Dec; 19(4):127-33. PubMed ID: 12396087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The facial growth of 300 subjects with Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion].
    Aknin JJ
    Orthod Fr; 1988; 59 Pt 2():459-75. PubMed ID: 3271966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of soft tissue facial morphometry in children with Class I and Class II occlusions.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Serrao G; Puletto S; Bignotto M; Tartaglia G
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(3):187-94. PubMed ID: 7814923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Postnatal growth of the exterior nose].
    Lang J; Bachmann C; Raabe S
    Gegenbaurs Morphol Jahrb; 1987; 133(1):5-32. PubMed ID: 3569819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Craniofacial growth in untreated skeletal Class II subjects: a longitudinal study.
    Chung CH; Wong WW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Dec; 122(6):619-26. PubMed ID: 12490873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cephalometric analysis of profile nasal esthetics. Part III. Postoperative changes after isolated superior repositioning.
    de Assis EA; Starck WJ; Epker BN
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1996; 11(4):279-88. PubMed ID: 9456605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Semilongitudinal cephalometric study of craniofacial growth in untreated Class III malocclusion.
    Alexander AE; McNamara JA; Franchi L; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):700.e1-14; discussion 700-1. PubMed ID: 19524825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The effect of growth and development on soft tissue profile in boys and girls with normal occlusion].
    Uner O; Dinçer M; Eroğlu EY
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1990 Apr; 3(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 2101660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Cephalometric studies of Class II, division 2 malocclusion].
    Maj G; Lucchese FP
    Orthod Fr; 1980; 51():239-45. PubMed ID: 6941164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparative study of cephalometric and arch width characteristics of Class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusions.
    Isik F; Nalbantgil D; Sayinsu K; Arun T
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 16431898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of cranial base growth in Class I and Class II skeletal patterns.
    Wilhelm BM; Beck FM; Lidral AC; Vig KW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):401-5. PubMed ID: 11298313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of cephalometric characteristics on the occlusal success rate of Class II malocclusions treated with 2- and 4-premolar extraction protocols.
    Janson G; Janson M; Nakamura A; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):861-8. PubMed ID: 18538250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The Jarabak method of growth prediction. Diagnostic considerations and therapeutic implications].
    Ghezzi F; Calcagno E; Zallio F
    Parodontol Stomatol (Nuova); 1986; 25(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 3097614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dentofacial features of Class II malocclusion associated with maxillary skeletal protrusion: a longitudinal study at the circumpubertal growth period.
    Vásquez MJ; Baccetti T; Franchi L; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 May; 135(5):568.e1-7; discussion 568-9. PubMed ID: 19409335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.