These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

50 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1816830)

  • 1. [The bite-jumping-appliance].
    Sander FG; Weinreich A
    Dtsch Stomatol (1990); 1991; 41(6):195-8. PubMed ID: 1816830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Bite jumping appliance with lower lip bumper].
    Chaiwat J; Deckunakorn S
    J Dent Assoc Thai; 1991; 41(2):66-77. PubMed ID: 1820369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of masticatory muscle function and bite-raising on mandibular morphology in the growing rat.
    Bresin A
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2001; (150):1-49. PubMed ID: 11803646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Balters' appliance and its action on the neuromuscular system].
    Travesi Gomez J
    Orthod Fr; 1992; 63 Pt 2():349-58. PubMed ID: 1341724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Condylar growth and mandibular positioning with stepwise vs maximum advancement.
    Hägg U; Rabie AB; Bendeus M; Wong RW; Wey MC; Du X; Peng J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):525-36. PubMed ID: 18929270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cephalometric evaluation of maxillary retrognathism cases treated with FR-3 appliance.
    Biren S; Erverdi N
    J Marmara Univ Dent Fac; 1993 Sep; 1(4):354-60. PubMed ID: 9582640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Biomechanical aspects of the spring-active-appliance during the night sleep].
    Sander FG
    Prakt Kieferorthop; 1991 Mar; 5(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 1815787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Treatment effects of the mandibular anterior repositioning appliance on patients with Class II malocclusion.
    Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Berger JL; Chermak DS; Kaczynski R; Simon ES; Haerian A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):286-95. PubMed ID: 12637901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Treatment of Angle Class II/1 malocclusions with the Herbst appliance].
    Soytarhan A; Işiksal E
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1990 Apr; 3(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 2101668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Initial and late treatment effects of headgear-Herbst appliance with mandibular step-by-step advancement.
    Hägg U; Du X; Rabie AB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):477-85. PubMed ID: 12439475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Influences of changing vertical dimension, occlusal contacts of bite plane and body position on masticatory muscle activities].
    Yoshida M
    Osaka Daigaku Shigaku Zasshi; 1990 Jun; 35(1):287-306. PubMed ID: 2135409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Sagittal and vertical changes in mandibular retrognathism. A teleradiological longitudinal study of patients with functional regulators compared to a control group].
    Falck F
    Stomatol DDR; 1983 Mar; 33(3):182-95. PubMed ID: 6577742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The modification of growth with the jumping-the-bite plate compared to other functional orthodontic appliances].
    Sander FG; Lassak C
    Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1990 Jun; 51(3):155-64. PubMed ID: 2373450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Activator versus cervical headgear: superimpositional cephalometric comparison.
    Haralabakis NB; Halazonetis DJ; Sifakakis IB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 12637902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The MAS (mandibular advancement series) difference.
    Spahl TJ
    Funct Orthod; 2001; 18(4):12-23. PubMed ID: 11887674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of treatment with a combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in skeletal Class III patients with different vertical skeletal morphologies.
    Yoshida I; Shoji T; Mizoguchi I
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 17218717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Guiding occlusal development with functional appliances.
    Nielsen IL
    Aust Orthod J; 1996 Oct; 14(3):133-42. PubMed ID: 9528411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective clinical trial comparing the effects of conventional Twin-block and mini-block appliances: Part 1. Hard tissue changes.
    Gill DS; Lee RT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):465-72; quiz 517. PubMed ID: 15821691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the modified maxillary protractor applied to Class III malocclusion with retruded maxilla in early mixed dentition.
    Kajiyama K; Murakami T; Suzuki A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Nov; 118(5):549-59. PubMed ID: 11094369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.