These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1816841)

  • 1. [Quantitative profilometric surface analyses to verify the accuracy of reproduction of elastic impression material].
    Pantke A
    Dtsch Stomatol (1990); 1991; 41(7):237-9. PubMed ID: 1816841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Reproducibility of surface roughness in vivo using elastomers, compounds and the replica technique].
    Pantke A
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1990 Jun; 45(6):341-4. PubMed ID: 2269121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Profilometric studies on the surface reproduction of dental impression materials].
    Setz J; Lin W; Geis-Gerstorfer J
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Aug; 44(8):587-9. PubMed ID: 2639061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials.
    Chen SY; Liang WM; Chen FN
    J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 15476954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Randomized controlled clinical study on the accuracy of two-stage putty-and-wash impression materials.
    Haim M; Luthardt RG; Rudolph H; Koch R; Walter MH; Quaas S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):296-302. PubMed ID: 19548415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Surface accuracy of hydrophilic impressions. 1].
    Bai L; Mizuno M
    Tsurumi Shigaku; 1989 May; 15(2):343-8. PubMed ID: 2641204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The physical properties of silicone impression materials with hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity. Wetting, water absorption, surface structure of dental stone and dimensional change on stone dies].
    Murakami H; Takehana S; Takenaka M; Abe T
    Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi; 1990 Dec; 28(4):1105-14. PubMed ID: 2135145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The accuracy of post-impressions with silicone-rubber impression materials and polysulfide-rubber impression materials].
    Aoyama S; Sano Y; Enomoto M; Hanamura N
    Tsurumi Shigaku; 1980 Jun; 6(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 6935848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surface roughness of impression materials and dental stones scanned by non-contacting laser profilometry.
    Rodriguez JM; Curtis RV; Bartlett DW
    Dent Mater; 2009 Apr; 25(4):500-5. PubMed ID: 19036424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detail reproduction, contact angles, and die hardness of elastomeric impression and gypsum die material combinations.
    Ragain JC; Grosko ML; Raj M; Ryan TN; Johnston WM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 11203635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Moisture effect on polyether and polyvinylsiloxane dimensional accuracy and detail reproduction.
    Walker MP; Petrie CS; Haj-Ali R; Spencer P; Dumas C; Williams K
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Sep; 14(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 16336232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of factors affecting the accuracy of impressions using quantitative surface analysis.
    Lee IK; DeLong R; Pintado MR; Malik R
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(6):246-52. PubMed ID: 8710707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Accuracy of various types of elastic impressions. Part 1. Evaluation of the surface detail reproducibility of elastic impressions].
    Tsutsumi C
    Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1984 Sep; 3(5):623-35. PubMed ID: 6596749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of the type and technique used for impression making on the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials.
    Habib AN; Shehata MT
    Egypt Dent J; 1995 Oct; 41(4):1409-16. PubMed ID: 9497690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro study on the dimensional accuracy of selected materials for monophase elastic impression making.
    Piwowarczyk A; Ottl P; Büchler A; Lauer HC; Hoffmann A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 11951807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of dimensional accuracy between three different addition cured silicone impression materials.
    Forrester-Baker L; Seymour KG; Samarawickrama D; Zou L; Cherukara G; Patel M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2005 Jun; 13(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 16011234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sulcus reproduction with elastomeric impression materials: a new in vitro testing method.
    Finger WJ; Kurokawa R; Takahashi H; Komatsu M
    Dent Mater; 2008 Dec; 24(12):1655-60. PubMed ID: 18499246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Compatibility of tissue conditioners and dental stones: effect on surface roughness.
    Murata H; Hong G; Li YA; Hamada T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):274-81. PubMed ID: 15775929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Type IV gypsum compatibility with five addition-reaction silicone impression materials.
    Butta R; Tredwin CJ; Nesbit M; Moles DR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):540-4. PubMed ID: 15942614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.