BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1817072)

  • 1. Cephalometric changes during headgear-reactivator treatment.
    Remmelink HJ; Tan BG
    Eur J Orthod; 1991 Dec; 13(6):466-70. PubMed ID: 1817072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A retrospective cephalometric evaluation of dental changes with activator and activator headgear combination in the treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion.
    Lall R; Kumar GA; Maheshwari A; Kumar M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Jan; 12(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 22186684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention.
    Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 May; 18(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 25545335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Orthodontic and orthopedic effects of Activator, Activator-HG combination, and Bass appliances: a comparative study.
    Cura N; Sarac M; Oztürk Y; Sürmeli N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Jul; 110(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 8686676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Growth and treatment changes in patients treated with a headgear-activator appliance.
    Bendeus M; Hägg U; Rabie B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Apr; 121(4):376-84. PubMed ID: 11997762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
    Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The treatment of severe 'gummy' Class II division 1 malocclusion using the maxillary intrusion splint.
    Orton HS; Slattery DA; Orton S
    Eur J Orthod; 1992 Jun; 14(3):216-23. PubMed ID: 1628688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stability of Class II, division 1 treatment with the headgear-activator combination followed by the edgewise appliance.
    Janson G; Caffer Dde C; Henriques JF; de Freitas MR; Neves LS
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Oct; 74(5):594-604. PubMed ID: 15529492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Initial and late treatment effects of headgear-Herbst appliance with mandibular step-by-step advancement.
    Hägg U; Du X; Rabie AB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):477-85. PubMed ID: 12439475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Treated with a Cervical-Pull Headgear: A Case Report.
    Shah AH
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2016; 27(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 27319037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of treatment with the Bass appliance on skeletal Class II malocclusions: a cephalometric investigation.
    Cura N; Saraç M
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Dec; 19(6):691-702. PubMed ID: 9458602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative evaluation of a new removable Jasper Jumper functional appliance vs an activator-headgear combination.
    Sari Z; Goyenc Y; Doruk C; Usumez S
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):286-93. PubMed ID: 12828437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A cephalometric investigation of the effects of the Elastic Bite-block in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions.
    Erverdi N; Ozkan G
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Oct; 17(5):375-84. PubMed ID: 8529750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Stahl F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):698.e1-10; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 19524823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Control of the vertical dimension in Class II correction using a cervical headgear and lower utility arch in growing patients. Part I.
    Cook AH; Sellke TA; BeGole EA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Oct; 106(4):376-88. PubMed ID: 7942653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and the activator-headgear combination appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    Lima KJ; Henriques JF; Janson G; Pereira SC; Neves LS; Cançado RH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 May; 143(5):684-94. PubMed ID: 23631970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Activator-Headgear and Twin Block Treatment Approaches in Class II Division 1 Malocclusion.
    Spalj S; Mroz Tranesen K; Birkeland K; Katic V; Pavlic A; Vandevska-Radunovic V
    Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():4861924. PubMed ID: 28203569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Class II correction in Herbst and Bass therapy.
    Pancherz H; Malmgren O; Hägg U; Omblus J; Hansen K
    Eur J Orthod; 1989 Feb; 11(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 2714389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Management of severe Class II division 1 malocclusion: a case report.
    Felicita AS; Chandrasekar S; Sundari KK
    Aust Orthod J; 2011 Nov; 27(2):181-90. PubMed ID: 22372276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.