These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
569 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18171960)
1. Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement. Meneghini RM; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Jan; 90(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 18171960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement. Surgical technique. Meneghini RM; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Mar; 91 Suppl 2 Pt 1():131-8. PubMed ID: 19255205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty: a five to nine-year follow-up. Kamath AF; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Feb; 97(3):216-23. PubMed ID: 25653322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Early results of the use of tantalum femoral cones for revision total knee arthroplasty. Howard JL; Kudera J; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Mar; 93(5):478-84. PubMed ID: 21368080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones for Severe Femoral and Tibial Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty are Reliable for Fixation at Mean 5-Year Follow-Up. Kayani B; Howard LC; Neufeld ME; Greidanus NV; Masri BA; Garbuz DS J Arthroplasty; 2024 Sep; 39(9S2):S374-S379. PubMed ID: 38508344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tantalum cones for major osteolysis in revision knee replacement. Rao BM; Kamal TT; Vafaye J; Moss M Bone Joint J; 2013 Aug; 95-B(8):1069-74. PubMed ID: 23908422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Midterm Results of Porous Tantalum Femoral Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Potter GD; Abdel MP; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Aug; 98(15):1286-91. PubMed ID: 27489319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tantalum cones in revision total knee arthroplasty. A promising short-term result with 29 cones in 21 patients. Villanueva-Martínez M; De la Torre-Escudero B; Rojo-Manaute JM; Ríos-Luna A; Chana-Rodriguez F J Arthroplasty; 2013 Jun; 28(6):988-93. PubMed ID: 23414934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcome of revision total knee arthroplasty with the use of trabecular metal cone for reconstruction of severe bone loss at the proximal tibia. Jensen CL; Winther N; Schrøder HM; Petersen MM Knee; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1233-7. PubMed ID: 25212989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tantalum Cones Provide Durable Mid-term Fixation in Revision TKA. De Martino I; De Santis V; Sculco PK; D'Apolito R; Assini JB; Gasparini G Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Oct; 473(10):3176-82. PubMed ID: 25968895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment of large bone defects with trabecular metal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty: short term clinical and radiographic outcomes. Derome P; Sternheim A; Backstein D; Malo M J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jan; 29(1):122-6. PubMed ID: 23702265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-year follow up utilizing tantal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty. Schmitz HC; Klauser W; Citak M; Al-Khateeb H; Gehrke T; Kendoff D J Arthroplasty; 2013 Oct; 28(9):1556-60. PubMed ID: 23664075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Addressing large tibial osseous defects in primary total knee arthroplasty using porous tantalum cones. You JS; Wright AR; Hasegawa I; Kobayashi B; Kawahara M; Wang J; Nakasone CK Knee; 2019 Jan; 26(1):228-239. PubMed ID: 30554910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Revision total knee arthroplasty using metaphyseal sleeves at short-term follow-up. Huang R; Barrazueta G; Ong A; Orozco F; Jafari M; Coyle C; Austin M Orthopedics; 2014 Sep; 37(9):e804-9. PubMed ID: 25350623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Total knee arthroplasty revision with trabecular tantalum cones: Preliminary retrospective study of 51 patients from two centres with a minimal 2-year follow-up. Girerd D; Parratte S; Lunebourg A; Boureau F; Ollivier M; Pasquier G; Putman S; Migaud H; Argenson JN Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Jun; 102(4):429-33. PubMed ID: 27052939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tantalum Cones for Severe Bone Defects in Revision Knee Arthroplasty: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up. De Martino I; Mancino F; Di Matteo V; Singlitico A; Maccauro G; Gasparini G J Arthroplasty; 2023 May; 38(5):886-892. PubMed ID: 36481282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones Improve Outcomes in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty? Bohl DD; Brown NM; McDowell MA; Levine BR; Sporer SM; Paprosky WG; Della Valle CJ J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jan; 33(1):171-177. PubMed ID: 28844630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High survival rate at mid-term follow up of porous tantalum cones for bone defects in revision total knee replacement: A 3-11 years follow up report. Rossi SMP; Perticarini L; Ghiara M; Jannelli E; Cortesi L; Benazzo F Knee; 2022 Mar; 35():175-182. PubMed ID: 35349974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]