743 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18173501)
1. Molecular ecological approaches to studying the evolutionary impact of selective harvesting in wildlife.
Coltman DW
Mol Ecol; 2008 Jan; 17(1):221-35. PubMed ID: 18173501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of size-selective harvesting: how much do we know?
Fenberg PB; Roy K
Mol Ecol; 2008 Jan; 17(1):209-20. PubMed ID: 17868288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genetic basis of fitness differences in natural populations.
Ellegren H; Sheldon BC
Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7184):169-75. PubMed ID: 18337813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evolutionary consequences of nonselective harvesting in density-dependent populations.
Engen S; Lande R; Sæther BE
Am Nat; 2014 Dec; 184(6):714-26. PubMed ID: 25438172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Strong artificial selection in the wild results in predicted small evolutionary change.
Postma E; Visser J; Van Noordwijk AJ
J Evol Biol; 2007 Sep; 20(5):1823-32. PubMed ID: 17714300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How to use molecular marker data to measure evolutionary parameters in wild populations.
Garant D; Kruuk LE
Mol Ecol; 2005 Jun; 14(7):1843-59. PubMed ID: 15910310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evolutionary potential of a large marine vertebrate: quantitative genetic parameters in a wild population.
Dibattista JD; Feldheim KA; Garant D; Gruber SH; Hendry AP
Evolution; 2009 Apr; 63(4):1051-67. PubMed ID: 19236474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The molecular signature of selection underlying human adaptations.
Harris EE; Meyer D
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2006; Suppl 43():89-130. PubMed ID: 17103426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evolution in ecological field experiments: implications for effect size.
Strauss SY; Lau JA; Schoener TW; Tiffin P
Ecol Lett; 2008 Mar; 11(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 18031555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effective population size dynamics reveal impacts of historic climatic events and recent anthropogenic pressure in African elephants.
Okello JB; Wittemyer G; Rasmussen HB; Arctander P; Nyakaana S; Douglas-Hamilton I; Siegismund HR
Mol Ecol; 2008 Sep; 17(17):3788-99. PubMed ID: 18643879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [From population genetics to population genomics of forest trees: integrated population genomics approach].
Krutovskiĭ KV
Genetika; 2006 Oct; 42(10):1304-18. PubMed ID: 17152702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evolutionary, behavioural and molecular ecology must meet to achieve long-term conservation goals.
Keogh JS
Mol Ecol; 2009 Sep; 18(18):3761-2. PubMed ID: 19761487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Molecular ecology of global change.
Reusch TB; Wood TE
Mol Ecol; 2007 Oct; 16(19):3973-92. PubMed ID: 17894755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Studying phenotypic evolution using multivariate quantitative genetics.
McGuigan K
Mol Ecol; 2006 Apr; 15(4):883-96. PubMed ID: 16599954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Undesirable evolutionary consequences of trophy hunting.
Coltman DW; O'Donoghue P; Jorgenson JT; Hogg JT; Strobeck C; Festa-Bianchet M
Nature; 2003 Dec; 426(6967):655-8. PubMed ID: 14668862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Molecular road ecology: exploring the potential of genetics for investigating transportation impacts on wildlife.
Balkenhol N; Waits LP
Mol Ecol; 2009 Oct; 18(20):4151-64. PubMed ID: 19732335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Landscape genetic analyses reveal cryptic population structure and putative selection gradients in a large-scale estuarine environment.
McCairns RJ; Bernatchez L
Mol Ecol; 2008 Sep; 17(17):3901-16. PubMed ID: 18662229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors affecting unintentional harvesting selectivity in a monomorphic species.
Bunnefeld N; Baines D; Newborn D; Milner-Gulland EJ
J Anim Ecol; 2009 Mar; 78(2):485-92. PubMed ID: 19021782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ontogenetic patterns in heritable variation for body size: using random regression models in a wild ungulate population.
Wilson AJ; Kruuk LE; Coltman DW
Am Nat; 2005 Dec; 166(6):E177-92. PubMed ID: 16475080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effective population sizes and migration rates in fragmented populations of an endangered insect (Coenagrion mercuriale: Odonata).
Watts PC; Saccheri IJ; Kemp SJ; Thompson DJ
J Anim Ecol; 2007 Jul; 76(4):790-800. PubMed ID: 17584385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
