BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18174070)

  • 1. Biomechanical and histological comparison of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic microimplants in dogs.
    Chen Y; Shin HI; Kyung HM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jan; 133(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 18174070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Biomechanical comparison of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic micro-implants].
    Chen Y; Zhao WT; Kyung HM
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Oct; 42(10):605-7. PubMed ID: 18215368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Potential of self-drilling orthodontic microimplants under immediate loading.
    Chen Y; Lee JW; Cho WH; Kyung HM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):496-502. PubMed ID: 20362909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical and histologic analysis of the stability of microimplants with immediate orthodontic loading in dogs.
    Chen Y; Kang ST; Bae SM; Kyung HM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):260-7. PubMed ID: 19651357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Primary stability and histomorphometric bone-implant contact of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic microimplants.
    Çehreli S; Arman-Özçırpıcı A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Feb; 141(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 22284286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of self-tapping and self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants: an animal study of insertion torque and displacement under lateral loading.
    Su YY; Wilmes B; Hönscheid R; Drescher D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):404-11. PubMed ID: 19587861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microdamage of the cortical bone during mini-implant insertion with self-drilling and self-tapping techniques: a randomized controlled trial.
    Yadav S; Upadhyay M; Liu S; Roberts E; Neace WP; Nanda R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 May; 141(5):538-46. PubMed ID: 22554747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Insertional torque and axial pull-out strength of mini-implants in mandibles of dogs.
    Salmória KK; Tanaka OM; Guariza-Filho O; Camargo ES; de Souza LT; Maruo H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):790.e15-22. PubMed ID: 18538236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical and histomorphometric analyses of the osseointegration of microscrews with different surgical techniques in beagle dogs.
    Wu X; Deng F; Wang Z; Zhao Z; Wang J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Nov; 106(5):644-50. PubMed ID: 18656397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stability of immediately loaded 3- and 6-mm miniscrew implants in beagle dogs--a pilot study.
    Mortensen MG; Buschang PH; Oliver DR; Kyung HM; Behrents RG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):251-9. PubMed ID: 19651356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the loading behavior of self-drilling and predrilled miniscrews throughout orthodontic loading.
    Wang YC; Liou EJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jan; 133(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 18174069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Histomorphologic and histomophometric evaluation of immediately and early loaded mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage.
    Freire JN; Silva NR; Gil JN; Magini RS; Coelho PG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jun; 131(6):704.e1-9. PubMed ID: 17561041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Placement and removal torque values of orthodontic miniscrew implants.
    Suzuki EY; Suzuki B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 May; 139(5):669-78. PubMed ID: 21536211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recommended placement torque when tightening an orthodontic mini-implant.
    Motoyoshi M; Hirabayashi M; Uemura M; Shimizu N
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Feb; 17(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 16441792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microcomputed tomographic analysis of bone reaction at insertion of orthodontic mini-implants in sheep.
    Rebaudi A; Laffi N; Benedicenti S; Angiero F; Romanos GE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1233-40. PubMed ID: 22167428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A torque removal study on the primary stability of orthodontic titanium screw mini-implants in the cortical bone of dog femurs.
    Okazaki J; Komasa Y; Sakai D; Kamada A; Ikeo T; Toda I; Suwa F; Inoue M; Etoh T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jul; 37(7):647-50. PubMed ID: 18554870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bone response to early orthodontic loading of endosseous implants.
    Yavuz U; Kirtiloglu T; Acikgoz G; Turk T; Trisi P
    J Oral Implantol; 2011 Mar; 37 Spec No():87-95. PubMed ID: 20594061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of miniscrew taper morphology on insertion and removal torque in dogs.
    Cha JY; Takano-Yamamoto T; Hwang CJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):777-83. PubMed ID: 20657874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of microimplants in orthodontic anchorage.
    Chen CH; Chang CS; Hsieh CH; Tseng YC; Shen YS; Huang IY; Yang CF; Chen CM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Aug; 64(8):1209-13. PubMed ID: 16860211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Orthodontic mini-implant stability in different healing times before loading: a microscopic computerized tomographic and biomechanical analysis.
    Zhao L; Xu Z; Yang Z; Wei X; Tang T; Zhao Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):196-202. PubMed ID: 19615659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.