404 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18174120)
1. No increase in response rate by adding a web response option to a postal population survey: a randomized trial.
Brøgger J; Nystad W; Cappelen I; Bakke P
J Med Internet Res; 2007 Dec; 9(5):e40. PubMed ID: 18174120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Utility of Web-based assessment of patient satisfaction with endoscopy.
Harewood GC; Wiersema MJ; de Groen PC
Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 May; 98(5):1016-21. PubMed ID: 12809822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mail versus internet surveys: determinants of method of response preferences among health professionals.
Lusk C; Delclos GL; Burau K; Drawhorn DD; Aday LA
Eval Health Prof; 2007 Jun; 30(2):186-201. PubMed ID: 17476030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective comparison of endoscopy patient satisfaction surveys: e-mail versus standard mail versus telephone.
Harewood GC; Yacavone RF; Locke GR; Wiersema MJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Dec; 96(12):3312-7. PubMed ID: 11774942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Geographic Information System mapping as a tool to assess nonresponse bias in survey research.
Hansen RA; Henley AC; Brouwer ES; Oraefo AN; Roth MT
Res Social Adm Pharm; 2007 Sep; 3(3):249-64. PubMed ID: 17945157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Electronic mail was not better than postal mail for surveying residents and faculty.
Akl EA; Maroun N; Klocke RA; Montori V; Schünemann HJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 58(4):425-9. PubMed ID: 15862729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Postal surveys of physicians gave superior response rates over telephone interviews in a randomized trial.
Hocking JS; Lim MS; Read T; Hellard M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 May; 59(5):521-4. PubMed ID: 16632141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating telephone follow-up of a mail survey of community pharmacies.
Westrick SC; Mount JK
Res Social Adm Pharm; 2007 Jun; 3(2):160-82. PubMed ID: 17561218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surveying general practitioners: does a low response rate matter?
Templeton L; Deehan A; Taylor C; Drummond C; Strang J
Br J Gen Pract; 1997 Feb; 47(415):91-4. PubMed ID: 9101692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Web and mail surveys for studying secondary consequences associated with substance use: evidence for minimal mode effects.
McCabe SE; Couper MP; Cranford JA; Boyd CJ
Addict Behav; 2006 Jan; 31(1):162-8. PubMed ID: 15916862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Telephone versus postal surveys of general practitioners: methodological considerations.
Sibbald B; Addington-Hall J; Brenneman D; Freeling P
Br J Gen Pract; 1994 Jul; 44(384):297-300. PubMed ID: 8068375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. College students' response rate to an incentivized combination of postal and web-based health survey.
Balajti I; Daragó L; Adány R; Kósa K
Eval Health Prof; 2010 Jun; 33(2):164-76. PubMed ID: 20457719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of web-based and paper-based survey methods: testing assumptions of survey mode and response cost.
Greenlaw C; Brown-Welty S
Eval Rev; 2009 Oct; 33(5):464-80. PubMed ID: 19605623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of response mode on study results: offering cigarette smokers a choice of postal or online completion of a survey.
Callas PW; Solomon LJ; Hughes JR; Livingston AE
J Med Internet Res; 2010 Oct; 12(4):e46. PubMed ID: 20965873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Racial and ethnic variation in response to mailed and telephone surveys among women in a managed care population.
Nelson KM; Geiger AM; Mangione CM
Ethn Dis; 2004; 14(4):580-3. PubMed ID: 15724779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of individual and population smoking data from a postal survey and general practice records.
Wilson A; Manku-Scott T; Shepherd D; Jones B
Br J Gen Pract; 2000 Jun; 50(455):465-8. PubMed ID: 10962784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Parents' attitudes towards hepatitis B vaccination for their children. A survey comparing paper and web questionnaires, Sweden 2005.
Dannetun E; Tegnell A; Giesecke J
BMC Public Health; 2007 May; 7():86. PubMed ID: 17511891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Increasing response rates in telephone surveys: a randomized trial.
Smith W; Chey T; Jalaludin B; Salkeld G; Capon T
J Public Health Med; 1995 Mar; 17(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 7786565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Feasibility of Internet health screening to recruit college students to an online smoking cessation intervention.
An LC; Hennrikus DJ; Perry CL; Lein EB; Klatt C; Farley DM; Bliss RL; Pallonen UE; Lando HA; Ehlinger EP; Ahluwalia JS
Nicotine Tob Res; 2007 Jan; 9 Suppl 1():S11-8. PubMed ID: 17365722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Self-rated health assessed by web versus mail modes in a mixed mode survey: the digital divide effect and the genuine survey mode effect.
Shim JM; Shin E; Johnson TP
Med Care; 2013 Sep; 51(9):774-81. PubMed ID: 23774510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
