These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18174335)

  • 1. Required sample size and nonreplicability thresholds for heterogeneous genetic associations.
    Moonesinghe R; Khoury MJ; Liu T; Ioannidis JP
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Jan; 105(2):617-22. PubMed ID: 18174335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nonreplication in genetic studies of complex diseases--lessons learned from studies of osteoporosis and tentative remedies.
    Shen H; Liu Y; Liu P; Recker RR; Deng HW
    J Bone Miner Res; 2005 Mar; 20(3):365-76. PubMed ID: 15746981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implications of small effect sizes of individual genetic variants on the design and interpretation of genetic association studies of complex diseases.
    Ioannidis JP; Trikalinos TA; Khoury MJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2006 Oct; 164(7):609-14. PubMed ID: 16893921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The power of genome-wide association studies of complex disease genes: statistical limitations of indirect approaches using SNP markers.
    Ohashi J; Tokunaga K
    J Hum Genet; 2001; 46(8):478-82. PubMed ID: 11501946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detailed analysis of the relative power of direct and indirect association studies and the implications for their interpretation.
    Moskvina V; O'Donovan MC
    Hum Hered; 2007; 64(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 17483598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gene mapping in the 20th and 21st centuries: statistical methods, data analysis, and experimental design.
    Terwilliger JD; Göring HH
    Hum Biol; 2000 Feb; 72(1):63-132. PubMed ID: 10721614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meta-analysis of genetic association studies: methodologies, between-study heterogeneity and winner's curse.
    Nakaoka H; Inoue I
    J Hum Genet; 2009 Nov; 54(11):615-23. PubMed ID: 19851339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Susceptibility locus on chromosome 1q23-25 for a schizophrenia subtype resembling deficit schizophrenia identified by latent class analysis.
    Holliday EG; McLean DE; Nyholt DR; Mowry BJ
    Arch Gen Psychiatry; 2009 Oct; 66(10):1058-67. PubMed ID: 19805696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Linkage analysis of cross-sectional and longitudinally derived phenotypic measures to identify loci influencing blood pressure.
    Shephard N; Falcaro M; Zeggini E; Chapman P; Hinks A; Barton A; Worthington J; Pickles A; John S
    BMC Genet; 2003 Dec; 4 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S26. PubMed ID: 14975094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genome-wide linkage scan of schizophrenia: a cross-isolate study.
    Bulayeva KB; Glatt SJ; Bulayev OA; Pavlova TA; Tsuang MT
    Genomics; 2007 Feb; 89(2):167-77. PubMed ID: 17140763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of human population structure on large genetic association studies.
    Marchini J; Cardon LR; Phillips MS; Donnelly P
    Nat Genet; 2004 May; 36(5):512-7. PubMed ID: 15052271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Meta-analysis of genetic association studies supports a contribution of common variants to susceptibility to common disease.
    Lohmueller KE; Pearce CL; Pike M; Lander ES; Hirschhorn JN
    Nat Genet; 2003 Feb; 33(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 12524541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dealing with heterogeneity between cohorts in genomewide SNP association studies.
    Lebrec JJ; Stijnen T; van Houwelingen HC
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2010; 9():Article 8. PubMed ID: 20196758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transmission disequilibrium test power and sample size in the presence of locus heterogeneity.
    Chen C; Yang G; Buyske S; Matise T; Finch SJ; Gordon D
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2009; 8():Article 44. PubMed ID: 19883370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Upward bias in odds ratio estimates from genome-wide association studies.
    Garner C
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 May; 31(4):288-95. PubMed ID: 17266119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Heterogeneity in meta-analyses of genome-wide association investigations.
    Ioannidis JP; Patsopoulos NA; Evangelou E
    PLoS One; 2007 Sep; 2(9):e841. PubMed ID: 17786212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methods for meta-analyses of genome-wide association studies: critical assessment of empirical evidence.
    Gögele M; Minelli C; Thakkinstian A; Yurkiewich A; Pattaro C; Pramstaller PP; Little J; Attia J; Thompson JR
    Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Apr; 175(8):739-49. PubMed ID: 22427610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When a case is not a case: effects of phenotype misclassification on power and sample size requirements for the transmission disequilibrium test with affected child trios.
    Buyske S; Yang G; Matise TC; Gordon D
    Hum Hered; 2009; 67(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 19172087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Asymptotic distribution of the "orthogonal" quantitative transmission disequilibrium test in a structured population: exact formula.
    Boitard S; Mangin B; Azaïs JM
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2010; 9():Article 11. PubMed ID: 20196746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. X chromosome association testing in genome wide association studies.
    Hickey PF; Bahlo M
    Genet Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 35(7):664-70. PubMed ID: 21818774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.