143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1817471)
1. Sampling endocervical cells on cervical smears: a comparison of two instruments used in general practice. Cumbrian Practice Research Group.
Br J Gen Pract; 1991 May; 41(346):192-3. PubMed ID: 1817471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A trial of two methods of taking cervical smears: the Aylesbury spatula plus cytology brush compared to the Cervex broom.
Sparrow MJ; Fauck R; Gupta RK
N Z Med J; 1997 Sep; 110(1052):356-8. PubMed ID: 9364178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the Cytobrush plus plastic spatula with the Cervex Brush for obtaining endocervical cells.
Cannon JM; Blythe JG
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 82(4 Pt 1):569-72. PubMed ID: 8377984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of four cytologic sampling techniques in a large family planning center.
Szarewski A; Curran G; Edwards R; Cuzick J; Kocjan G; Bounds W; Guillebaud J
Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(4):457-60. PubMed ID: 8328239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervical smears following laser treatment. Comparison of Cervex brush versus Cytobrush-Ayre spatula sampling.
Szarewski A; Cuzick J; Singer A
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 1994639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adequacy of cervical cytology sampling with the Cervex brush and the Aylesbury spatula: a population based randomised controlled trial.
Dey P; Collins S; Desai M; Woodman C
BMJ; 1996 Sep; 313(7059):721-3. PubMed ID: 8819441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the endocervical Cytobrush and Cervex-Brush in pregnant women.
Paraiso MF; Brady K; Helmchen R; Roat TW
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 84(4):539-43. PubMed ID: 8090390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Cervix cytology: Cervex Brush versus conventional cotton swab].
Altermatt HJ; Wyler K; Fravi R; Liu X; Kraft R; Dreher E
Praxis (Bern 1994); 1997 Jun; 86(24):1029-33. PubMed ID: 9312820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cervex-Brush vs. spatula and Cytobrush. A cytohistologic evaluation.
Risberg B; Andersson A; Zetterberg C; Nordin B
J Reprod Med; 1997 Jul; 42(7):405-8. PubMed ID: 9252930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved endocervical sampling with the Cytobrush.
Chalvardjian A; De Marchi WG; Bell V; Nishikawa R
CMAJ; 1991 Feb; 144(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 1989710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cellular composition of cervical smears in relation to the day of the menstrual cycle and the method of contraception.
Vooijs GP; van der Graaf Y; Elias AG
Acta Cytol; 1987; 31(4):417-26. PubMed ID: 3604536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Acceptable quality cervical cytology taking: comparison of Cervex-brush and Cervex-mex methods].
Ojeda Ortiz J; Muñoz Molina R; Pardo López M; Guevara Cruz M; Hernández Quijano T; Valencia Elizondo C; Hernández Valencia M
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2008 Jul; 76(7):381-5. PubMed ID: 18798438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison between the Accu-Pap device and the extended-tip wooden Ayre spatula for cervical cytology sampling.
Stock RJ; Thurmond AI; Passmore A
Acta Cytol; 1988; 32(3):307-10. PubMed ID: 3376697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative yield of endocervical and metaplastic cells. Two sampling techniques: wooden spatula and cytology brush.
Lo L; Jordan J
Can Fam Physician; 1995 Sep; 41():1497-502. PubMed ID: 8520238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The optimal technique for obtaining a Papanicolaou smear with the Cervex-Brush.
Ferris DG; Berrey MM; Ellis KE; Petry LJ; Voxnaes J; Beatie RT
J Fam Pract; 1992 Mar; 34(3):276-80. PubMed ID: 1541953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Cervical smears taken by physicians' assistants are of lesser quality than smears taken by family physicians, but almost as good as the national average].
Voordijk-van der Ben MH; Buntinx F
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jan; 144(2):74-7. PubMed ID: 10674106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved endocervical sampling and HPV viral load detection by Cervex-Brush Combi.
Depuydt CE; Benoy IH; Bailleul EJ; Vandepitte J; Vereecken AJ; Bogers JJ
Cytopathology; 2006 Dec; 17(6):374-81. PubMed ID: 17168921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cervical cytology with the Papette sampler.
Ferenczy A; Robitaille J; Guralnick M; Shatz R
J Reprod Med; 1994 Apr; 39(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 8040849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparison of the methods of cytobrush and Ayre spatula in the concentration of endocervical cells].
Longatto Filho A; Maeda MY; Santos DR; de Andréa Filho A; Cavaliere MJ; Shih LW; Oyafuso MS
Rev Paul Med; 1991; 109(3):93-6. PubMed ID: 1947611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervex-Brush and Cytobrush. Comparison of their ability to sample abnormal cells for cervical smears.
Hutchinson M; Fertitta L; Goldbaum B; Hamza M; Vanerian S; Isenstein L
J Reprod Med; 1991 Aug; 36(8):581-6. PubMed ID: 1941800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
