These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1817471)

  • 21. Efficacy of the cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells.
    Kristensen GB; Hølund B; Grinsted P
    Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):849-51. PubMed ID: 2588918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A randomized trial of three methods of obtaining Papanicolaou smears.
    Pretorius RG; Sadeghi M; Fotheringham N; Semrad N; Watring WG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):831-6. PubMed ID: 1923208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of Cytobrush sampling, spatula sampling and combined Cytobrush-spatula sampling of the uterine cervix.
    Buntinx F; Boon ME; Beck S; Knottnerus JA; Essed GG
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 1994637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The screening Papanicolaou smear: contribution of the endocervical brush.
    Taylor PT; Andersen WA; Barber SR; Covell JL; Smith EB; Underwood PB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Nov; 70(5):734-8. PubMed ID: 3658282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparative cytologic yield and quality of three Pap smear instruments.
    Toffler WL; Pluedeman CK; Sinclair AE; Ireland KM; Byrne BJ
    Fam Med; 1993 Jun; 25(6):403-7. PubMed ID: 8349063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Analysis of five sampling methods for the preparation of cervical smears.
    Boon ME; de Graaff Guilloud JC; Rietveld WJ
    Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):843-8. PubMed ID: 2588917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Endocervical brush versus cotton swab for obtaining cervical smears at a clinic. A cost comparison.
    Harrison DD; Hernandez E; Dunton CJ
    J Reprod Med; 1993 Apr; 38(4):285-8. PubMed ID: 8501736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparing two sampling techniques for endocervical cell recovery on Papanicolaou smears.
    Helderman G; Graham L; Cannon D; Waters K; Feller D
    Nurse Pract; 1990 Nov; 15(11):30-2. PubMed ID: 2255424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Cell-Sweep. A new cervical cytology sampling device.
    Tyau L; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Edmonds P
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Nov; 39(11):899-902. PubMed ID: 7853282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of four cytological sampling techniques in a genitourinary medicine clinic.
    Szarewski A; Cuzick J; Nayagam M; Thin RN
    Genitourin Med; 1990 Dec; 66(6):439-43. PubMed ID: 2265842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Consequences of the introduction of combined spatula and Cytobrush sampling for cervical cytology. Improvements in smear quality and detection rates.
    Boon ME; Alons-van Kordelaar JJ; Rietveld-Scheffers PE
    Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 3521176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of cytobrush with Cervex-Brush for endocervical cytologic sampling.
    Neinstein LS; Church J; Akiyoshi T
    J Adolesc Health; 1992 Sep; 13(6):520-3. PubMed ID: 1390820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of two Papanicolaou smear techniques in a family practice setting.
    Reissman SE
    J Fam Pract; 1988 May; 26(5):525-9. PubMed ID: 3367117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effectiveness and safety of two cervical cytologic techniques during pregnancy.
    Stillson T; Knight AL; Elswick RK
    J Fam Pract; 1997 Aug; 45(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 9267375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Brush vs. spatula for cervical smears. Histologic correlation with concurrent biopsies.
    Chakrabarti S; Guijon FB; Paraskevas M
    Acta Cytol; 1994; 38(3):315-8. PubMed ID: 8191818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The extended tip spatula for cervical cytology.
    Colón VF; Linz LE
    J Fam Pract; 1981 Jul; 13(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 7252437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Optimal collection technique and devices for a quality pap smear.
    Marchand L; Mundt M; Klein G; Agarwal SC
    WMJ; 2005 Aug; 104(6):51-5. PubMed ID: 16218317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparison of the three most common Papanicolaou smear collection techniques.
    Germain M; Heaton R; Erickson D; Henry M; Nash J; O'Connor D
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 8041524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of spatula and nonspatula methods for cervical sampling.
    Rammou-Kinia R; Anagnostopoulou I; Gomousa M
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 1994638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [The use of the cervix brush for early diagnosis of cervix uteri cancer: quality of the smear].
    Weyler J; Engels H
    Arch Belg; 1989; 47(1-4):81-4. PubMed ID: 2610580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.