These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18174840)

  • 1. Low-energy dynamic indentation method for analysis of ophthalmic materials.
    Artús P; Dürsteler JC; Martínez AB
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jan; 85(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 18174840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Low energy dart test for mechanical evaluation of ophthalmic materials.
    Martínez AB; Artús P; Dürsteler JC; Arencón D
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Aug; 86(8):979-87. PubMed ID: 19609228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A biphasic model for micro-indentation of a hydrogel-based contact lens.
    Chen X; Dunn AC; Sawyer WG; Sarntinoranont M
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Apr; 129(2):156-63. PubMed ID: 17408320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A phenomenological approach toward patient-specific computational modeling of articular cartilage including collagen fiber tracking.
    Pierce DM; Trobin W; Trattnig S; Bischof H; Holzapfel GA
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 Sep; 131(9):091006. PubMed ID: 19725695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measuring viscoelasticity of soft samples using atomic force microscopy.
    Tripathy S; Berger EJ
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 Sep; 131(9):094507. PubMed ID: 19725704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing behind armor blunt trauma in accordance with the National Institute of Justice Standard for Personal Body Armor Protection using finite element modeling.
    Roberts JC; Ward EE; Merkle AC; O'Connor JV
    J Trauma; 2007 May; 62(5):1127-33. PubMed ID: 17495712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mechanical characterization of contact lenses by microindentation: Constant velocity and relaxation testing.
    Lee SJ; Bourne GR; Chen X; Sawyer WG; Sarntinoranont M
    Acta Biomater; 2008 Sep; 4(5):1560-8. PubMed ID: 18406673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of single-phase isotropic elastic and fibril-reinforced poroelastic models for indentation of rabbit articular cartilage.
    Julkunen P; Harjula T; Marjanen J; Helminen HJ; Jurvelin JS
    J Biomech; 2009 Mar; 42(5):652-6. PubMed ID: 19193381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Alteration of skin mechanics by thin polymer films.
    Jachowicz J; McMullen R; Prettypaul D
    Skin Res Technol; 2008 Aug; 14(3):312-9. PubMed ID: 19159377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamic indentation on human skin in vivo: ageing effects.
    Boyer G; Laquièze L; Le Bot A; Laquièze S; Zahouani H
    Skin Res Technol; 2009 Feb; 15(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 19152580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Probing near-surface nanoscale mechanical properties of low modulus materials using a quartz crystal resonator atomic force microscope.
    Kong YP; Chen L; Yee AF
    Nanotechnology; 2011 Jul; 22(29):295709. PubMed ID: 21685557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The nano-epsilon dot method for strain rate viscoelastic characterisation of soft biomaterials by spherical nano-indentation.
    Mattei G; Gruca G; Rijnveld N; Ahluwalia A
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Oct; 50():150-9. PubMed ID: 26143307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of a high fracture toughness composite ceramic for dental applications.
    Aboushelib MN; Kleverlaan CJ; Feilzer AJ
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Oct; 17(7):538-44. PubMed ID: 18761572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determination of the elastic/plastic transition of human enamel by nanoindentation.
    Ang SF; Scholz T; Klocke A; Schneider GA
    Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1403-10. PubMed ID: 19647864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Characterization of the mechanical properties of a dermal equivalent compared with human skin in vivo by indentation and static friction tests.
    Zahouani H; Pailler-Mattei C; Sohm B; Vargiolu R; Cenizo V; Debret R
    Skin Res Technol; 2009 Feb; 15(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 19152581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The viscoelastic behavior of dental adhesives: a nanoindentation study.
    Sadr A; Shimada Y; Lu H; Tagami J
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 18579198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Testing safety eyewear: how frame and lens design affect lens retention.
    McMahon JM; Beckerman S
    Optometry; 2007 Feb; 78(2):78-87. PubMed ID: 17258162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The dynamic interaction of water with four dental impression materials during cure.
    Hosseinpour D; Berg JC
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):292-300. PubMed ID: 19210607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanical properties of contact lenses: The contribution of measurement techniques and clinical feedback to 50 years of materials development.
    Bhamra TS; Tighe BJ
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Apr; 40(2):70-81. PubMed ID: 27884616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical modeling of biological cells in microinjection.
    Tan Y; Sun D; Huang W; Cheng SH
    IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2008 Dec; 7(4):257-66. PubMed ID: 19203869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.