186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18174889)
1. Retraction rates are on the rise.
Cokol M; Ozbay F; Rodriguez-Esteban R
EMBO Rep; 2008 Jan; 9(1):2. PubMed ID: 18174889
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomedical paper retractions have quadrupled in 20 years - why?
Else H
Nature; 2024 Jun; 630(8016):280-281. PubMed ID: 38822109
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023 - a new record.
Van Noorden R
Nature; 2023 Dec; 624(7992):479-481. PubMed ID: 38087103
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Fraud in medicine. Coping with fraud.
Farthing MJ
Lancet; 1998 Dec 19-26; 352 Suppl 4():SIV11. PubMed ID: 9872158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Scientific misconduct. Researcher faces prison for fraud in NIH grant applications and papers.
Kintisch E
Science; 2005 Mar; 307(5717):1851. PubMed ID: 15790813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Dubious data remain in print two years after misconduct inquiry.
Abbott A; Schwarz J
Nature; 2002 Jul; 418(6894):113. PubMed ID: 12110849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Shaking up science.
Couzin-Frankel J
Science; 2013 Jan; 339(6118):386-9. PubMed ID: 23349264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Meet this super-spotter of duplicated images in science papers.
Shen H
Nature; 2020 May; 581(7807):132-136. PubMed ID: 32405024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Publication rates after the first retraction for biomedical researchers with multiple retracted publications.
Mistry V; Grey A; Bolland MJ
Account Res; 2019 Jul; 26(5):277-287. PubMed ID: 31025884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The science of retraction.
Nat Neurosci; 2002 Dec; 5(12):1249. PubMed ID: 12447375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Retracted publications in the drug literature.
Samp JC; Schumock GT; Pickard AS
Pharmacotherapy; 2012 Jul; 32(7):586-95. PubMed ID: 22581659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retraction policies of top scientific journals ranked by impact factor.
Resnik DB; Wager E; Kissling GE
J Med Libr Assoc; 2015 Jul; 103(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 26213505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Peer-Review Fraud--Hacking the Scientific Publication Process.
Haug CJ
N Engl J Med; 2015 Dec; 373(25):2393-5. PubMed ID: 26488392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Ego Has Landed! What Can Be Done About Research Misconduct, Scandals, and Spins?
Thompson DR; Clark AM
Am J Med; 2019 May; 132(5):552-553. PubMed ID: 30550755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Update to readers and authors on ethical and scientific misconduct: retraction of the "Boldt articles".
Miller DR
Can J Anaesth; 2011 Sep; 58(9):777-9, 779-81. PubMed ID: 21800211
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Figure errors, sloppy science, and fraud: keeping eyes on your data.
Williams CL; Casadevall A; Jackson S
J Clin Invest; 2019 Mar; 129(5):1805-1807. PubMed ID: 30907748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Retractions: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Wager E; Barbour V; Yentis S; Kleinert S;
Obes Rev; 2010 Jan; 11(1):64-6. PubMed ID: 20653849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Managing research misconduct: is anyone getting it right?
Tavare A
BMJ; 2011 Dec; 343():d8212. PubMed ID: 22207043
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Referencing retracted articles.
Emmett M
Am J Med; 2006 Jul; 119(7):e7. PubMed ID: 16828619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Stop citing fraudulent and duplicate articles].
Maisonneuve H
Presse Med; 2007 May; 36(5 Pt 1):749-52. PubMed ID: 17398065
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
